Approx weight of a Trek 4500?

[Badger South]

Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500
hard tail MTN bike.

Anyone have the figures?

Thx!

-B

[Van Weng Koon]

"Badger South" > wrote in message
...
>
> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500
> hard tail MTN bike.
>
> Anyone have the figures?
>
> Thx!
>
> -B

About 27 lb.

VWK

[Badger South]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:21:37 +0800, "Van Weng Koon"
> wrote:

>
>"Badger South" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500
>> hard tail MTN bike.
>>
>> Anyone have the figures?
>>

>About 27 lb.
>
>VWK

Thanks, Van.

So that makes an interesting range of about 45lbs for a WalGoose, at
one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)

-B

[B a r r y B u r k e J r .]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:38:16 -0500, Badger South >
wrote:


>one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)

What racing bike is 3 pounds?

Barry

[Badger South]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:09:43 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
> wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:38:16 -0500, Badger South >
>wrote:
>
>
>>one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)
>
>What racing bike is 3 pounds?
>
>Barry

Oops, wheel weight is not incl. in that measurement. I just looked at
the final number.

Trek D4 5900

Frame 1000grams
Fork 339gm
----------------------------
1339gms (2.96 lbs)

-B

[B a r r y B u r k e J r .]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:25:54 -0500, Badger South >
wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:09:43 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:38:16 -0500, Badger South >
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)
>>
>>What racing bike is 3 pounds?
>>
>>Barry
>
>Oops, wheel weight is not incl. in that measurement. I just looked at
>the final number.
>
>Trek D4 5900
>
>Frame 1000grams
>Fork 339gm
>----------------------------
> 1339gms (2.96 lbs)


Wheel weight? You'd also need the rest of the parts. A set of wheels
attached to a frame will not be a very good ride! <G>

Barry

[John Thompson]

On 2003-11-23, Badger South > wrote:

> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500
> hard tail MTN bike.
>
> Anyone have the figures?

Laden or unladen? :-)

--

-John )

[Rick Onanian]

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:39 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
> wrote:
>Wheel weight? You'd also need the rest of the parts. A set of wheels
>attached to a frame will not be a very good ride! <G>

I expect that fixie riders would enjoy it; they ride fixies for the
simplicity and the better road feel...

>Barry
--
Rick Onanian

[Rick Onanian]

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:50:58 GMT, John Thompson
> wrote:
>On 2003-11-23, Badger South > wrote:
>> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500
>> hard tail MTN bike.
>>
>> Anyone have the figures?
>
>Laden or unladen? :-)

African or European?
--
Rick Onanian

[B a r r y B u r k e J r .]

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:45:52 -0500, Rick Onanian >
wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:39 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
> wrote:
>>Wheel weight? You'd also need the rest of the parts. A set of wheels
>>attached to a frame will not be a very good ride! <G>
>
>I expect that fixie riders would enjoy it; they ride fixies for the
>simplicity and the better road feel...


Even fixies have handlebars, stems, seatposts, saddles, crankes,
pedals, chains, and sometimes, brakes, no? <G>

Barry

[Tom Sherman]

Rick Onanian wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:50:58 GMT, John Thompson
> > wrote:
> >On 2003-11-23, Badger South > wrote:
> >> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500
> >> hard tail MTN bike.
> >>
> >> Anyone have the figures?
> >
> >Laden or unladen? :-)
>
> African or European?

We want..... A SHRUBBERY!!!!

Tom Sherman - Planet Earth