Perth Freeway Bike Hike distance

[DeF]

Did anyone get an accurate measure of the distance
between start and finish for the freeway bike hike?
I had a timing anklet on but didn't press the right
buttons on my computer to get the distance.

It's supposed to be a nominal 30km but if that's
right then my average speed was 43kph which seems
unlikely, even if I did sit in a fast bunch for
most of the way.

DeF.

--
e-mail: d.farrow@your finger.murdoch.edu.au
To reply, you'll have to remove your finger.

[dtmeister]

DeF <""d.farrow\"@your finger.murdoch.edu.au"> wrote:
> Did anyone get an accurate measure of the distance
> between start and finish for the freeway bike hike?
> I had a timing anklet on but didn't press the right
> buttons on my computer to get the distance.
>
> It's supposed to be a nominal 30km but if that's
> right then my average speed was 43kph which seems
> unlikely, even if I did sit in a fast bunch for
> most of the way.

My Polar HRM said 28.7km. It's well calibrated (via GPS) but it still
suffers from the occasional data dropout due to interference.


--
..dt

[DeF]

dtmeister wrote:
> DeF <""d.farrow\"@your finger.murdoch.edu.au"> wrote:
>> Did anyone get an accurate measure of the distance
>> between start and finish for the freeway bike hike?
>> I had a timing anklet on but didn't press the right
>> buttons on my computer to get the distance.
>>
>> It's supposed to be a nominal 30km but if that's
>> right then my average speed was 43kph which seems
>> unlikely, even if I did sit in a fast bunch for
>> most of the way.
>
> My Polar HRM said 28.7km. It's well calibrated (via GPS) but it still
> suffers from the occasional data dropout due to interference.
>
>
Thanks for that, this makes it 41kph for me
which is quicker than I've ever ridden any
sustained distance. And it felt like it as
I wasn't on my "good" bike.

Any advance on 28.7km?

DeF.

--
e-mail: d.farrow@your finger.murdoch.edu.au
To reply, you'll have to remove your finger.

[Gumby]

29.075km

DeF > wrote:
> dtmeister wrote:
>
>> DeF <""d.farrow\"@your finger.murdoch.edu.au"> wrote:
>>
>>> Did anyone get an accurate measure of the distance
>>> between start and finish for the freeway bike hike?
>>> I had a timing anklet on but didn't press the right
>>> buttons on my computer to get the distance.
>>>
>>> It's supposed to be a nominal 30km but if that's
>>> right then my average speed was 43kph which seems
>>> unlikely, even if I did sit in a fast bunch for
>>> most of the way.
>>
>>
>> My Polar HRM said 28.7km. It's well calibrated (via GPS) but it still
>> suffers from the occasional data dropout due to interference.
>>
>>
> Thanks for that, this makes it 41kph for me
> which is quicker than I've ever ridden any
> sustained distance. And it felt like it as
> I wasn't on my "good" bike.
>
> Any advance on 28.7km?
>
> DeF.
>

[DeF]

Gumby wrote:
> 29.075km
>
> DeF > wrote:
>> dtmeister wrote:
>>
>>> DeF <""d.farrow\"@your finger.murdoch.edu.au"> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did anyone get an accurate measure of the distance
>>>> between start and finish for the freeway bike hike?
>>>> I had a timing anklet on but didn't press the right
>>>> buttons on my computer to get the distance.
>>>>
>>>> It's supposed to be a nominal 30km but if that's
>>>> right then my average speed was 43kph which seems
>>>> unlikely, even if I did sit in a fast bunch for
>>>> most of the way.
>>>
>>>
>>> My Polar HRM said 28.7km. It's well calibrated (via GPS) but it still
>>> suffers from the occasional data dropout due to interference.
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks for that, this makes it 41kph for me
>> which is quicker than I've ever ridden any
>> sustained distance. And it felt like it as
>> I wasn't on my "good" bike.
>>
>> Any advance on 28.7km?
>>
>> DeF.
>>

That would be an ambit claim from the serial top-poster?

DeF

--
e-mail: d.farrow@your finger.murdoch.edu.au
To reply, you'll have to remove your finger.