PDA

View Full Version : "Toy-Bicycle Syndrome"


cfsmtb
June 6th 06, 02:20 AM
Fascinating article from Procycling about the so called "Toy-Bicycle
Syndrome" from an American perspective. From an 'Australian
perspective', the recent increase of commuter and utility cycling has
numerous irrational obstacles to overcome.
http://probicycle.com/

Which we will in due course ... -(cfsmtb sits up a bit straighter,
pushes shoulders back, looks stoically into the distance....)-


****************************
THE AMERICAN TOY-BICYCLE SYNDROME[/B]:
BIKE RIDERS ARE UNPREDICTABLE. MOTORISTS SHOULD NOT HAVE TO DODGE OR BE
DELAYED BY BICYCLES. MUCH MORE LIKE PEDESTRIANS THAN VEHICLES, BICYCLES
SHOULD NOT BE ON THE ROADS AT ALL. IF A SEPARATE SIDEWALK OR OTHER
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PATH CAN NOT BE PROVIDED, THEN BICYCLISTS MUST BE
KEPT OUT OF THE WAY OF MOTORISTS BY THE USE OF SEPARATE BICYCLE LANES.

*TOY BICYCLE*:
- GROUPED WITH PEDESTRIANS AS A PEDESTRIAN-ON-WHEELS.
- SEPARATE, LIMITED, DANGEROUS, SLOW, SUBSTANDARD RESTRICTED SYSTEM OF
LANES AND PATHS.
- SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION OF ACCESS, RIGHTS AND RULES.
- DANGEROUS SHARED PEDESTRIAN PATHS.
- GO SOMEWHERE TO RIDE

*VEHICULAR CYCLING*:
- SAME RIGHTS AND LEGAL STANDING AS EVERY OTHER VEHICLE OPERATOR.
- ENFORCE SAFE SHARABLE ROAD DESIGN POLICIES. ACCOMMODATION ON EVERY
ROAD. - - SHARABLE-WIDTH LANES, BIKEABLE SHOULDERS.
- SAME ROADS - SAME RIGHTS - SAME RULES
- THE SAFEST FORM OF RECREATIONAL AND UTILITY CYCLING- BY FAR.
- RIDE TO GO SOMEWHERE

[B]HOW DID THIS HAPPEN, AND HOW DOES IT CONTINUE?
The Toy-Bicycle Syndrome began in the 1950's and is based upon the
concept of bicycling as children's' play activity, which in fact it
largely was in the America of 1950. In the 1970's a fitness-crazed
adult American public discovered the modern lightweight 10-speed
bicycle and the "bike boom" began.

Millions of cyclists took to the roads and panic set in with motorists
and transportation planners that had long held the belief that bicycles
belonged on sidewalks. Thirty years later, those same concepts prevail
and control the American bicycling environment.

Worse than ignorance alone, the American public and transportation
establishment base their beliefs and actions on a false foundation.
Motorists and the vast majority of bicycle owners have no understanding
of the concepts and safety of proper cycling and how easy it is for
motorists and cyclists to coexist. Rather than working for the little
that is needed to make vehicular cycling safe, easy and practical on
every road, American bicycle advocacy, decisions and goals are
invariably based on the toy-bicycle syndrome.


--
cfsmtb

Duncan
June 6th 06, 03:41 AM
That's quite a funny site.. reminds me of the onion:

"87% of Americans commit to bicycle commuting. Bike path to be built."

RUBY SLIPPERS, KS- Results are in for America's most comprehensive
survey of bicycle transportation. Almost nine of ten adult Americans
say
they definitely might occasionally be likely to bicycle to work once in
a
while given a government-provided bicycle and a commute less than
3 miles with no hills on sunny days between 64 and 71 degrees when
they had no other errands to run if their employer provided monetary
incentives with mileage reimbursement, shower facilities, indoor
secured
bicycle parking and free taxi rides home for emergencies if gasoline
prices
skyrocket except for Mondays and Fridays if a bicycle path was
available.
A spokesman for the Federal Highway Administration called the survey
results exciting verification for FHWA's bicycle transportation program
which helps local transportation agencies find a scenic creek bank
where
the bike path can be installed.


(ps: the original cited article makes a lot of good points, despite the
alarmist beginning)

Zebee Johnstone
June 6th 06, 04:08 AM
In aus.bicycle on Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:04:29 +1000
Bikesoiler > wrote:
> "Same Roads
> Same Rights
> Same Rules"

What... no passing on the left unless the other vehicle is turning
right?

No more than one vehicle in the lane unless the other is turning?

No advanced stop lines?

No parking on the footpath? No "shared paths" at all?

Are you sure....


Zebee

Bikesoiler
June 6th 06, 05:18 AM
Zebee Johnstone Wrote:
> In aus.bicycle on Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:04:29 +1000
> Bikesoiler > wrote:
> > "Same Roads
> > Same Rights
> > Same Rules"
>
> What... no passing on the left unless the other vehicle is turning
> right?
>
> No more than one vehicle in the lane unless the other is turning?
>
> No advanced stop lines?
>
> No parking on the footpath? No "shared paths" at all?
>
> Are you sure....
>
>
> Zebee


Where did you get the no passing on the left?

Meh. I'd trade a lot for wide curbside lanes & better attitude in most
drivers.


--
Bikesoiler

Resound
June 6th 06, 05:20 AM
Bikesoiler Wrote:
> "Same Roads
> Same Rights
> Same Rules"
>
> We need a jersy with this printed on it, in a large font.

I'd be in for that if a batch got printed. High visibility of course :)


--
Resound

Zebee Johnstone
June 6th 06, 05:50 AM
In aus.bicycle on Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:18:06 +1000
Bikesoiler > wrote:
>
> Where did you get the no passing on the left?

Cars can't do it in the same lane. They can on a 2 lane road.

A bicycle can on a one lane road.

> Meh. I'd trade a lot for wide curbside lanes & better attitude in most
> drivers.

But you couldn't *use* the kerbside lanes. Not to pass cars anyway.

Zebee

cfsmtb
June 6th 06, 06:44 AM
Duncan Wrote:
>
> (ps: the original cited article makes a lot of good points, despite
> the
> alarmist beginning)

I'll agree that some of the Effective Cycling material can come across
as too strident, you should lurk on the Chainguard list and read the
tanties!


--
cfsmtb

hippy
June 6th 06, 09:02 PM
Bikesoiler Wrote:
> Where did you get the no passing on the left?
> Meh. I'd trade a lot for wide curbside lanes & better attitude in most
> drivers.

You get the better attitude over here but you have to trade for the
dodgy weather and dodgier food. The beer is better though :)

hippy


--
hippy

Google

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home