journal: strenuous exercise creates false positives for rEPO test

[Burt]

http://doucheblogcycling.blogspot.com/2006/12/wow-this-sucks-for-wada_17.html

[MMan]

Burt wrote:
> http://doucheblogcycling.blogspot.com/2006/12/wow-this-sucks-for-wada_17.html

WADA will now ban strenuous exercise.

[Dan Connelly]

MMan wrote:
> Burt wrote:
>> http://doucheblogcycling.blogspot.com/2006/12/wow-this-sucks-for-wada_17.html
>
> WADA will now ban strenuous exercise.
>
http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/full/108/5/1778

[nobody]

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:12:43 GMT, Dan Connelly
> wrote:

>MMan wrote:
>> Burt wrote:
>>> http://doucheblogcycling.blogspot.com/2006/12/wow-this-sucks-for-wada_17.html
>>
>> WADA will now ban strenuous exercise.
>>
>http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/full/108/5/1778

http://veloptimum.net/courses/athletes/Jeanson/E/6/DelangheReport.html

[Steven L. Sheffield]

On 12/18/06 2:12 PM, in article
, "Dan Connelly"
> wrote:

> MMan wrote:
>> Burt wrote:
>>>
http://doucheblogcycling.blogspot.com/2006/12/wow-this-sucks-for-wada_17.htm>>>
l
>>
>> WADA will now ban strenuous exercise.
>>
> http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/full/108/5/1778



Hmmm ... Is it any surprise that the director of a WADA sanctioned
laboratory would say that WADA tests are flawless?



--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash

[CowPunk]

nobody wrote:

> http://veloptimum.net/courses/athletes/Jeanson/E/6/DelangheReport.html

I like this line:
"It is well known in clinical chemistry that the vast majority of
so-called ?laboratory errors? originate in the pre-analytical phase
(the phase prior to the analysis of the sample)."

i.e. sneezing, hacking, breathing, picking his nose, combing his hair,
talking, or
can you say, "you got your chocolate in my peanut butter.", while
diluting the sample
in an open lab prior to analysis.

Picture this. Joe the lab guy was snorting Vicks sinus inhaler all
night because he
ran out of sick days, which he used to go skiing last winter. He's
working on your sample
and "achew", he sneezes. Now, what do you think the odds are that the
sample will
test positive for say 0.0001 of a banned substance? Care to place your
career on that?

IMHO
The only fair solution is to start having each sample sent out to
multiple labs(min 3) for
analysis and then comparing the results.

[[email protected]]

CowPunk wrote:

> The only fair solution is to start having each sample sent out to
> multiple labs(min 3) for
> analysis and then comparing the results.

There is no "solution".

There might be "fairer" or "less stupid" ways to run the show. --D-y

[Davey Crockett]

" > writes:

> CowPunk wrote:
>
> > The only fair solution is to start having each sample sent out to
> > multiple labs(min 3) for
> > analysis and then comparing the results.
>
> There is no "solution".
>

Get Sherlock.

He solves every case

Hes said to have the "Seven Percent Solution"

--
Le vent à Dos
Davey Crockett [No 4Q to reply]

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article >,
Davey Crockett > wrote:

> " > writes:
>
> > CowPunk wrote:
> >
> > > The only fair solution is to start having each sample sent out to
> > > multiple labs(min 3) for
> > > analysis and then comparing the results.
> >
> > There is no "solution".
> >
>
> Get Sherlock.
>
> He solves every case
>
> Hes said to have the "Seven Percent Solution"

Cocaine is a WADA-banned substance.

And probably even performance-enhancing,

--
Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

[[email protected]]

Davey Crockett wrote:
> " > writes:
>
> > CowPunk wrote:
> >
> > > The only fair solution is to start having each sample sent out to
> > > multiple labs(min 3) for
> > > analysis and then comparing the results.
> >
> > There is no "solution".
> >
>
> Get Sherlock.
>
> He solves every case
>
> Hes said to have the "Seven Percent Solution"

But what about the other 93% of all the guys who are all doping?

Calling a fictional character for resolution has good resonance, IMHO.
--D-y

[RonSonic]

On 18 Dec 2006 12:57:04 -0800, "MMan" > wrote:

>
>Burt wrote:
>> http://doucheblogcycling.blogspot.com/2006/12/wow-this-sucks-for-wada_17.html
>
>WADA will now ban strenuous exercise.

It does give some an advantage over those like myself who refrain from such
unnatural performance enhancing techniques.

Ron

[RonSonic]

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:14:46 GMT, Ryan Cousineau > wrote:

>In article >,
> Davey Crockett > wrote:
>
>> " > writes:
>>
>> > CowPunk wrote:
>> >
>> > > The only fair solution is to start having each sample sent out to
>> > > multiple labs(min 3) for
>> > > analysis and then comparing the results.
>> >
>> > There is no "solution".
>> >
>>
>> Get Sherlock.
>>
>> He solves every case
>>
>> Hes said to have the "Seven Percent Solution"
>
>Cocaine is a WADA-banned substance.
>
>And probably even performance-enhancing,

It and caffeine are about the only stimulants that don't ruin your reaction
time.

Ron