RR: On The Bike Again

[Ride-A-Lot]

I was determined to get on the bike again. It had been since
Thanksgiving and while skiing is fun, I need my bike fix. So based upon
some scouting, asking, and guess I made my way to Bear Creek Lake Park
and was joined by Ed (another former Jersey guy). I checked out the
trails before he arrived and unfortunately there were not ridable.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5335.jpg

That meant road and bike path. With singlespeeds ready to go, the 29"
wheels hit the clear road until we climb up the damn. At least we had
some dirt.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5336.jpg

Even though the bike paths were snow covered, they were sort of plowed.
It actually added some challenge to a normally mundane ride. The one
exception was coming off the south damn which was covered in wind blown
drifts for about 1/4 mile.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5337.jpg

Our wheel move a lot faster than the rusty old wagon. Still, it's a
perfect setting for this last bastion of great plains before the foothills.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5339.jpg

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5340.jpg

More snow covered fun.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5342.jpg

Closing off 15 miles with the standard bike against the log picture.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5344.jpg

Well, I'm ready to have my trails back now!

Thanks to Ed for the company.

[Paladin]

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> I was determined to get on the bike again. It had been since
> Thanksgiving and while skiing is fun, I need my bike fix. So based upon
> some scouting, asking, and guess I made my way to Bear Creek Lake Park
> and was joined by Ed (another former Jersey guy). I checked out the
> trails before he arrived and unfortunately there were not ridable.
>
> Thanks to Ed for the company.

Cool, and glad you got out for some riding. This picture of yours is
what our upper trails look like:

http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5342.jpg Very nice stuff to
ride.

CDB

[GeeDubb]

"Ride-A-Lot" > wrote in message
...
>I was determined to get on the bike again. It had been since Thanksgiving
>and while skiing is fun, I need my bike fix. So based upon some scouting,
>asking, and guess I made my way to Bear Creek Lake Park and was joined by
>Ed (another former Jersey guy). I checked out the trails before he arrived
>and unfortunately there were not ridable.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5335.jpg
>
> That meant road and bike path. With singlespeeds ready to go, the 29"
> wheels hit the clear road until we climb up the damn. At least we had
> some dirt.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5336.jpg
>
> Even though the bike paths were snow covered, they were sort of plowed. It
> actually added some challenge to a normally mundane ride. The one
> exception was coming off the south damn which was covered in wind blown
> drifts for about 1/4 mile.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5337.jpg
>
> Our wheel move a lot faster than the rusty old wagon. Still, it's a
> perfect setting for this last bastion of great plains before the
> foothills.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5339.jpg
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5340.jpg
>
> More snow covered fun.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5342.jpg
>
> Closing off 15 miles with the standard bike against the log picture.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5344.jpg
>
> Well, I'm ready to have my trails back now!
>
> Thanks to Ed for the company.

I got all ready this morning, camelback filled and my phone rings....."Gary,
it's pouring at my house", What? I look out and surenuff it's pouring at my
house as well. Thirty minutes earlier the sun was peaking through. An hour
later and it's still drizzling.

Would still be a good day for a ss ride on the dg.

Nice stuff, Mitch.

Gary

[Ride-A-Lot]

GeeDubb wrote:
>
> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>
> Gary

Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.

Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.

http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg

[GeeDubb]

"Ride-A-Lot" > wrote in message
...
> GeeDubb wrote:
>>
>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>
>> Gary
>
> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
>
> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
>

Snow....bbbrrrrrrrrrr

I understand the "never get in pictures" because like you I'm usually taking
them. The PS trip had few photos taken until the last day.....when I wasn't
there. The recent tour of the BCTLPL may turn up a picture or two of me
that MTBBILL took. Then again, I don't ride well enough to justify the
memory usage!

I still have all my bike stuff laid out just in case it clears off but the
satellite image doesn't look promising. The loop showed a massive cloud
covering damn near the entire country.....

Maybe I'll get to ski after all this year.

Gary

[daddy]

On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:03:52 -0700, GeeDubb wrote:

>
> "Ride-A-Lot" > wrote in message
> ...
>>I was determined to get on the bike again. It had been since Thanksgiving
>>and while skiing is fun, I need my bike fix. So based upon some scouting,
>>asking, and guess I made my way to Bear Creek Lake Park and was joined by
>>Ed (another former Jersey guy). I checked out the trails before he arrived
>>and unfortunately there were not ridable.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5335.jpg
>>
>> That meant road and bike path. With singlespeeds ready to go, the 29"
>> wheels hit the clear road until we climb up the damn. At least we had
>> some dirt.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5336.jpg
>>
>> Even though the bike paths were snow covered, they were sort of plowed. It
>> actually added some challenge to a normally mundane ride. The one
>> exception was coming off the south damn which was covered in wind blown
>> drifts for about 1/4 mile.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5337.jpg
>>
>> Our wheel move a lot faster than the rusty old wagon. Still, it's a
>> perfect setting for this last bastion of great plains before the
>> foothills.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5339.jpg
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5340.jpg
>>
>> More snow covered fun.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5342.jpg
>>
>> Closing off 15 miles with the standard bike against the log picture.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5344.jpg
>>
>> Well, I'm ready to have my trails back now!
>>
>> Thanks to Ed for the company.
>
> I got all ready this morning, camelback filled and my phone rings....."Gary,
> it's pouring at my house", What? I look out and surenuff it's pouring at my
> house as well. Thirty minutes earlier the sun was peaking through. An hour
> later and it's still drizzling.
>
> Would still be a good day for a ss ride on the dg.
>
> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>
> Gary

same here chief! And I'm wanting to take my SB on it's shakedown cruise....
grrr..... Sunny "Arid"zona eh???

God I love this frame/setup. What a rock'n bike. (Mitch, JD, others,
thanks for steering me this way...)

[G.T.]

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> GeeDubb wrote:
>>
>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>
>> Gary
>
> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
>
> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
>
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
>

Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are those?
36ers or something?

Greg

--
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons

[Ride-A-Lot]

G.T. wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>> GeeDubb wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>
>> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
>> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
>>
>> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
>>
>
> Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are those?
> 36ers or something?
>
> Greg
>

29". They look big because the frame is so small. Remember, I am only
5'5". It's a great snow bike, though. I'm even thinking about a
pugsley if this keeps up. I ran the tires at about 25# which gave a
pretty good amount of traction.

[GeeDubb]

"daddy" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:03:52 -0700, GeeDubb wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ride-A-Lot" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>I was determined to get on the bike again. It had been since
>>>Thanksgiving
>>>and while skiing is fun, I need my bike fix. So based upon some
>>>scouting,
>>>asking, and guess I made my way to Bear Creek Lake Park and was joined by
>>>Ed (another former Jersey guy). I checked out the trails before he
>>>arrived
>>>and unfortunately there were not ridable.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5335.jpg
>>>
>>> That meant road and bike path. With singlespeeds ready to go, the 29"
>>> wheels hit the clear road until we climb up the damn. At least we had
>>> some dirt.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5336.jpg
>>>
>>> Even though the bike paths were snow covered, they were sort of plowed.
>>> It
>>> actually added some challenge to a normally mundane ride. The one
>>> exception was coming off the south damn which was covered in wind blown
>>> drifts for about 1/4 mile.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5337.jpg
>>>
>>> Our wheel move a lot faster than the rusty old wagon. Still, it's a
>>> perfect setting for this last bastion of great plains before the
>>> foothills.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5339.jpg
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5340.jpg
>>>
>>> More snow covered fun.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5342.jpg
>>>
>>> Closing off 15 miles with the standard bike against the log picture.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5344.jpg
>>>
>>> Well, I'm ready to have my trails back now!
>>>
>>> Thanks to Ed for the company.
>>
>> I got all ready this morning, camelback filled and my phone
>> rings....."Gary,
>> it's pouring at my house", What? I look out and surenuff it's pouring at
>> my
>> house as well. Thirty minutes earlier the sun was peaking through. An
>> hour
>> later and it's still drizzling.
>>
>> Would still be a good day for a ss ride on the dg.
>>
>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>
>> Gary
>
> same here chief! And I'm wanting to take my SB on it's shakedown
> cruise....
> grrr..... Sunny "Arid"zona eh???
>
> God I love this frame/setup. What a rock'n bike. (Mitch, JD, others,
> thanks for steering me this way...)
>
>
what travel are you going to run on the back? I've found that anything
greater than the minimum pogos like crazy so I leave it at 3.5" so I can
climb better.

and how do you know you like it until you've actually ridden it hard?

Gary(getting brighter out, may have to ride)

[cc]

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> G.T. wrote:
>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>>> GeeDubb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>
>>> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
>>> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
>>>
>>> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
>>>
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
>>>
>>
>> Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are those?
>> 36ers or something?
>>
>> Greg
>>
>
> 29". They look big because the frame is so small. Remember, I am only
> 5'5". It's a great snow bike, though. I'm even thinking about a
> pugsley if this keeps up. I ran the tires at about 25# which gave a
> pretty good amount of traction.
>

Holy cow, that's a good
question. Those wheels look
absolutely ginormous.

[G.T.]

cc wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>> G.T. wrote:
>>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>>>> GeeDubb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
>>>> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are
>>> those? 36ers or something?
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>
>> 29". They look big because the frame is so small. Remember, I am
>> only 5'5". It's a great snow bike, though. I'm even thinking about a
>> pugsley if this keeps up. I ran the tires at about 25# which gave a
>> pretty good amount of traction.
>>
>
> Holy cow, that's a good question. Those wheels look absolutely ginormous.

Especially the picture from behind. And I know those were 29", er 700c,
I'm sure I've commented on it here in the past.

Anyway, I'm about to head out on my 29er, the one with drop bars. And
since I have a 27" wheeled bike on the way I was wondering why a 29er is
called a 29er when there are 27er's that actually have larger diameter
wheels? I'm surprised the marketeers didn't revive 27" and call it 31"
or something, after all we all know that bigger is better.

Greg

--
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons

[daddy]

On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:31:17 -0700, GeeDubb wrote:

>
> "daddy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:03:52 -0700, GeeDubb wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Ride-A-Lot" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>I was determined to get on the bike again. It had been since
>>>>Thanksgiving
>>>>and while skiing is fun, I need my bike fix. So based upon some
>>>>scouting,
>>>>asking, and guess I made my way to Bear Creek Lake Park and was joined by
>>>>Ed (another former Jersey guy). I checked out the trails before he
>>>>arrived
>>>>and unfortunately there were not ridable.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5335.jpg
>>>>
>>>> That meant road and bike path. With singlespeeds ready to go, the 29"
>>>> wheels hit the clear road until we climb up the damn. At least we had
>>>> some dirt.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5336.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Even though the bike paths were snow covered, they were sort of plowed.
>>>> It
>>>> actually added some challenge to a normally mundane ride. The one
>>>> exception was coming off the south damn which was covered in wind blown
>>>> drifts for about 1/4 mile.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5337.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Our wheel move a lot faster than the rusty old wagon. Still, it's a
>>>> perfect setting for this last bastion of great plains before the
>>>> foothills.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5339.jpg
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5340.jpg
>>>>
>>>> More snow covered fun.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5342.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Closing off 15 miles with the standard bike against the log picture.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/012007/IMG_5344.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Well, I'm ready to have my trails back now!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to Ed for the company.
>>>
>>> I got all ready this morning, camelback filled and my phone
>>> rings....."Gary,
>>> it's pouring at my house", What? I look out and surenuff it's pouring at
>>> my
>>> house as well. Thirty minutes earlier the sun was peaking through. An
>>> hour
>>> later and it's still drizzling.
>>>
>>> Would still be a good day for a ss ride on the dg.
>>>
>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>
>> same here chief! And I'm wanting to take my SB on it's shakedown
>> cruise....
>> grrr..... Sunny "Arid"zona eh???
>>
>> God I love this frame/setup. What a rock'n bike. (Mitch, JD, others,
>> thanks for steering me this way...)
>>
>>
> what travel are you going to run on the back? I've found that anything
> greater than the minimum pogos like crazy so I leave it at 3.5" so I can
> climb better.
>
> and how do you know you like it until you've actually ridden it hard?
>
> Gary(getting brighter out, may have to ride)

trying the mid-range first. (4.5"). I'm at 175lbs. (for a data point).

[daddy]

>
> and how do you know you like it until you've actually ridden it hard?
>

OK!!! Just the demo ride at this point! I'm no GeeDubb or JD! :-)

[Ride-A-Lot]

daddy wrote:
>> and how do you know you like it until you've actually ridden it hard?
>>
>
> OK!!! Just the demo ride at this point! I'm no GeeDubb or JD! :-)
>

Pffftttt! No problem. I eat those guys for lunch.

/How do you make the skeptical emoticon?/

[daddy]

>>>
>>
>> OK!!! Just the demo ride at this point! I'm no GeeDubb or JD! :-)
>>
>
> Pffftttt! No problem. I eat those guys for lunch.
>
> /How do you make the skeptical emoticon?/


Exactly!!! :-)

[daddy]

> what travel are you going to run on the back? I've found that anything
> greater than the minimum pogos like crazy so I leave it at 3.5" so I can
> climb better.
>
Gary,

is your's "pushed"? what rear shock do you have? Mine is an 05 Fox Talas
RC Float....

-Gregg (finally the rain has stopped here in Gilbert).

[daddy]

>
> Gary(getting brighter out, may have to ride)

Just spoke to my MIL. She said they had snow in
Ahwahtukee this morning! Wild sh*t! Snow in the
Valley of the Sun.... Last time I saw that was in
the 80's, early 90's. (can't remember the exact
year).

[JD]

G.T. wrote:
> cc wrote:
> > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> >> G.T. wrote:
> >>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> >>>> GeeDubb wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gary
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
> >>>> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
> >>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are
> >>> those? 36ers or something?
> >>>
> >>> Greg
> >>>
> >>
> >> 29". They look big because the frame is so small. Remember, I am
> >> only 5'5". It's a great snow bike, though. I'm even thinking about a
> >> pugsley if this keeps up. I ran the tires at about 25# which gave a
> >> pretty good amount of traction.
> >>
> >
> > Holy cow, that's a good question. Those wheels look absolutely ginormous.
>
> Especially the picture from behind. And I know those were 29", er 700c,
> I'm sure I've commented on it here in the past.
>
> Anyway, I'm about to head out on my 29er, the one with drop bars. And
> since I have a 27" wheeled bike on the way I was wondering why a 29er is
> called a 29er when there are 27er's that actually have larger diameter
> wheels? I'm surprised the marketeers didn't revive 27" and call it 31"
> or something, after all we all know that bigger is better.
>
> Greg


I'm starting the 27er revolution. They have magical properties when
set up as a fixed gear...

JD

[GeeDubb]

"daddy" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> and how do you know you like it until you've actually ridden it hard?
>>
>
> OK!!! Just the demo ride at this point! I'm no GeeDubb or JD! :-)
>

Man is that an overstatement. I'm not in the same league as JD when it
comes to bike handling/control/knowledge, I just ride up smooth stuff better
than most. Make it slightly technical and I can't ride up.....or down well.

The reason I asked the ? was that I demoed the bike, loved it and then found
that it's not a good climbing bike especially at 4.5" travel and the head
angle isn't great for tight twisty stuff (but this could be me!). I also
got a large frame which may have been a mistake since I have short legs but
I didn't like the cramped, feeling like I'm already going OTB, feeling.

Gary

[GeeDubb]

"daddy" > wrote in message
...
>> what travel are you going to run on the back? I've found that anything
>> greater than the minimum pogos like crazy so I leave it at 3.5" so I can
>> climb better.
>>
> Gary,
>
> is your's "pushed"? what rear shock do you have? Mine is an 05 Fox Talas
> RC Float....
>
> -Gregg (finally the rain has stopped here in Gilbert).

I just had the 01 Fox Float RCLC Pushed and I wouldn't recommend it unless
you need the shock rebuilt anyway. Friends that have SP shocks (5th
elements) told me that Push did not add this technology to my shock and I'd
have to agree since I get way more bob than I did before and now I can't
even lock out the shock since Push removed the LO feature. I sent an email
to Push but never got a response so guess it's time for a call to see
exactly what the $180 covered.

Yep the rain quit.....and turned to snow!

Gary

[GeeDubb]

"daddy" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> Gary(getting brighter out, may have to ride)
>
> Just spoke to my MIL. She said they had snow in
> Ahwahtukee this morning! Wild sh*t! Snow in the
> Valley of the Sun.... Last time I saw that was in
> the 80's, early 90's. (can't remember the exact
> year).

I remember it snowing several times as a kid and once in the 80's. Driving
North on Pima road where it use to curve into Bell and damn near went off
the road with the company truck due to slush/ice......I bet the
Superstitions look nice this morning.

Gary

[Paladin]

daddy wrote:
> > what travel are you going to run on the back? I've found that anything
> > greater than the minimum pogos like crazy so I leave it at 3.5" so I can
> > climb better.
> >
> Gary,
>
> is your's "pushed"? what rear shock do you have? Mine is an 05 Fox Talas
> RC Float....
>
> -Gregg (finally the rain has stopped here in Gilbert).

Let me poke my nose in on this conversation. Since you have the Talas
rear shock, it's an easy process to flip it down to short travel on
climbs, and open it up on descents. If you also have adjustable travel
on the front, or at least a lock out, then you can make this a pretty
decent beast for climbing. I'm 180lbs, 5'10" or 11" have an xl frame,
which is really close to a large, and it fits me great. I have a short
stem that is good for control on the downhill, but makes me focus a
little more forward on the climbs.

When I forget to lock anything out on a climb, riding buddies notice
I'm losing a ton of energy to bob, sag, and his buddy pogo.

So take some pictures to post with your ride reports if/when you can...

CDB

[Scott Gordo]

JD wrote:
> G.T. wrote:
> > cc wrote:
> > > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > >> G.T. wrote:
> > >>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > >>>> GeeDubb wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Gary
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done since
> > >>>> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
> > >>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are
> > >>> those? 36ers or something?
> > >>>
> > >>> Greg
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> 29". They look big because the frame is so small. Remember, I am
> > >> only 5'5". It's a great snow bike, though. I'm even thinking about a
> > >> pugsley if this keeps up. I ran the tires at about 25# which gave a
> > >> pretty good amount of traction.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Holy cow, that's a good question. Those wheels look absolutely ginormous.
> >
> > Especially the picture from behind. And I know those were 29", er 700c,
> > I'm sure I've commented on it here in the past.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm about to head out on my 29er, the one with drop bars. And
> > since I have a 27" wheeled bike on the way I was wondering why a 29er is
> > called a 29er when there are 27er's that actually have larger diameter
> > wheels? I'm surprised the marketeers didn't revive 27" and call it 31"
> > or something, after all we all know that bigger is better.
> >
> > Greg
>
>
> I'm starting the 27er revolution. They have magical properties when
> set up as a fixed gear...
>
> JD

Especially if you're using a bike computer. It's more precise since you
don't have to convert metric to mph.

http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/toles-orbiter.gif

/s

[David W]

"Scott Gordo" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> JD wrote:
>> G.T. wrote:
>> > cc wrote:
>> > > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>> > >> G.T. wrote:
>> > >>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>> > >>>> GeeDubb wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Nice stuff, Mitch.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Well, the snow couldn't let a weekend go by as it has not done
>> > >>>> since
>> > >>>> Thanksgiving. So, it is snowing again.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Here's a couple of shots of me. I never get in pictures.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment1.jpg
>> > >>>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/attachment2.jpg
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Looks like fun, cold, but fun. And, damn, what size wheels are
>> > >>> those? 36ers or something?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Greg
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >> 29". They look big because the frame is so small. Remember, I am
>> > >> only 5'5". It's a great snow bike, though. I'm even thinking about
>> > >> a
>> > >> pugsley if this keeps up. I ran the tires at about 25# which gave a
>> > >> pretty good amount of traction.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Holy cow, that's a good question. Those wheels look absolutely
>> > > ginormous.
>> >
>> > Especially the picture from behind. And I know those were 29", er
>> > 700c,
>> > I'm sure I've commented on it here in the past.
>> >
>> > Anyway, I'm about to head out on my 29er, the one with drop bars. And
>> > since I have a 27" wheeled bike on the way I was wondering why a 29er
>> > is
>> > called a 29er when there are 27er's that actually have larger diameter
>> > wheels? I'm surprised the marketeers didn't revive 27" and call it 31"
>> > or something, after all we all know that bigger is better.
>> >
>> > Greg
>>
>>
>> I'm starting the 27er revolution. They have magical properties when
>> set up as a fixed gear...
>>
>> JD
>
> Especially if you're using a bike computer. It's more precise since you
> don't have to convert metric to mph.
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/toles-orbiter.gif
>
> /s
>

you do realize you're talking to Mr. ANTI-TECHNOLOGY don't you?

just checking...