PDA

View Full Version : Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?


War Office
May 25th 07, 06:19 PM
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?


Architects and Engineers are trained to create buildings that function
well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-
rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11
presented us with a body evidence (i.e. controlled demolition) that
was largely outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated
attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to
rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore find ourselves
relying solely upon the judgment of outside experts and, quite
willingly, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that
the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and
resulting fires. After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the
building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses".

There is however a growing body of solid evidence regarding these
"collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining
ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave
doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 experts as well as the official
reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will
readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both
classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the
evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We
hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review
each section thoroughly.

george
May 25th 07, 09:18 PM
On May 26, 5:19 am, War Office > wrote:
> Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

Because those collapses are now part of the training of structural
engineers and architects.

John P.
May 26th 07, 04:56 AM
"False Facts" > wrote in a message

> Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

Because they are architects and engineers. By looking at history, they can
hope to avoid any mistakes made. From the minute those towers collapsed,
they have been studying and discussing the 'why' of it.

Of course, your hope is to imply something entirely different. As usual, you
fail miserably.


> There is however a growing body of solid evidence regarding these
> "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years...

Parroting 5 year old conspiracy theories that were debunked 5 years ago is
*not* the same as a 'growing body of solid evidence'. The only growing body
seems to be the tumor growing where your brain once existed.

> It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will
> readily see...

That the 'will' readily see? So, you are *hoping* they look at it? Wasn't it
the purpose of your question a pathetic attempt to make others believe
architects and engineers already *have* bought into your lunacy?

What's the matter - feeling alone in your padded cell?


: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both
> classic and novel forms of controlled demolition. You will find the
> evidence here in our website as well as at the linked websites. We
> hope you will find the courage and take the necessary time to review
> each section thoroughly.
>

george
June 1st 07, 02:44 AM
On May 26, 5:19 am, War Office > wrote:
> Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?

Because those collapses are now part of the training of structural
engineers and architects.

Google

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home