MattB, JNugent Et Al: In What Way Are They "Trolls"?

[Nuxx Bar]

Can any of the pro-camera posters name a single anti-camera poster who
they haven't automatically dismissed as a "troll"?

Can anyone explain what the likes of MattB and JNugent have done to
deserve the "troll" label? (By the way, "Disagreeing with me",
"Exposing my anti-motorist stance" and "Annoying me with the truth"
aren't valid answers.)

If you can't do either of the above things (as the facts are,
annoyingly, *yet again* against you...funny how that keeps happening),
or you don't like me coming on here and posting true facts about
cameras, road safety, anti-motorist policies or lying anti-motorist
trolls, just confirm it by posting "Don't feed the troll" or something
similarly original, witty and clever. After all, the utterly banal,
useless, predictable and worthless comments posted by the likes of you
can only make my posts appear even more incisive, perceptive and
articulate than they actually are. So knock yourself out (preferably
literally), and show what a brainless little turd you really are.
Come on "_" and friends, what are you waiting for?

(By the way, since so many of you seem to get so *incredibly* narked
by people daring to descend into your anti-motorist cesspit and
posting true things, I've got some advice for you: why don't you jump
ship and assume a stance which is actually based on truth, logic and
reason? After all, the truth could hardly irritate you then, could
it? As ever, you know I'm right really. Surely if something is
clearly annoying you so much, it's best to take steps to deal with it
conclusively. Posting "Oh I'm so big, look at me and my killfile",
"You're a troll" and "La la la not listening" are only temporary
fixes, as some other git will always come along and remind you of the
truth again, but stopping this silly anti-motorist nonsense and
assuming a stance based on science and facts will sort the problem out
permanently, and then you'll never need to try to hide the truth from
yourself again. Wouldn't that be better all round? Aren't you weary
of posting "Black is white" and then covering your eyes and posting
tired abuse anytime someone points out that actually white is white?
Is it really worth the hassle and the irritation? If you're not going
to stop defending cameras for the sake of motorists, or for the sake
of the thousands of road users who are being killed by cameras, do it
for the sake of your own sanity, before you lose it completely
(although obviously it's too late in the case of the likes of
Spindrift, which is very sad).)

[Paul Weaver]

On 25 Sep, 22:54, Nuxx Bar > wrote:
> Can any of the pro-camera posters name a single anti-camera poster who
> they haven't automatically dismissed as a "troll"?

I didn't have a complaint for my wedding photographer

> Can anyone explain what the likes of MattB and JNugent have done to
> deserve the "troll" label? *(By the way, "Disagreeing with me",
> "Exposing my anti-motorist stance" and "Annoying me with the truth"
> aren't valid answers.)

I've never considered JNugent a troll, and I've encountered it for 10
years+

> If you can't do either of the above things (as the facts are,
> annoyingly, *yet again* against you...funny how that keeps happening),
> or you don't like me coming on here and posting true facts about
> cameras

Cameras take pictures. Everybody agrees on that, surely.

>, road safety, anti-motorist policies or lying anti-motorist

There are many anti-motorist policies in the united kingdom of great
britain and northern ireland

> trolls, just confirm it by posting "Don't feed the troll" or something
> similarly original, witty and clever

/todo insert something witty

>*After all, the utterly banal
> useless, predictable and worthless comments

Ask 60 million people what the lottery numbers will be, and one will
probably get it right

> posted by the likes of you
> can only make my posts appear even more incisive, perceptive and
> articulate than they actually are. *So knock yourself out (preferably
> literally), and show what a brainless little turd you really are.
> Come on "_" and friends, what are you waiting for?
>
> (By the way, since so many of you seem to get so *incredibly* narked

And naked, which is close

> by people daring to descend into your anti-motorist cesspit and
> posting true things, I've got some advice for you: why don't you jump
> ship

May drown, definatly get wet

> and assume a stance which is actually based on truth, logic and
> reason? *After all, the truth could hardly irritate you then, could
> it? *As ever, you know I'm right really. *Surely if something is
> clearly annoying you so much, it's best to take steps to deal with it
> conclusively. *Posting "Oh I'm so big, look at me and my killfile",

My killfile is a program -- "$istroll=1 if /./;". Makes things simpler

> "You're a troll" and "La la la not listening"
Yes, I left my headphones at work

> are only temporary
> fixes, as some other git
CVS? SVN?

> will always come along and remind you of the
> truth again

Perhaps, but there aren't enough bytes in the matter stream...

[Tim Dunne]

Nuxx Bar wrote:

8<...

_____________________
/| /| | | |
||__|| | | Please don't feed |
/ O O\__ | the trolls... |
/ \ | thank you. |
/ \ \|_____________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________



--
My hearts numbered beat | Greetings from Birmingham, UK
Still echoes in this empty room |All about me: www.nervouscyclist.org
Fear wells in me, but nothing seems| Is your ISP pimping your data?
Enough to defend Dave Matthews| www.badphorm.co.uk

[Just zis Guy, you know?[_2_]]

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:30:18 -0700 (PDT), Paul Weaver
> said in
>:

>there aren't enough bytes in the matter stream...

Caused me to sit back and wonder just how empty nuxxy's life must be
that posting his fact-free diatribes and being either ignored or
ridiculed as a worthless lying troll, is somehow an attractive
option when deciding how to use his time.

I mean, spending that much time and energy to tell people that you
are a complete tosser, and would they mind please flaming you into
oblivion - well, it's very odd behaviour.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

[judith]

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:11:24 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
> wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:30:18 -0700 (PDT), Paul Weaver
> said in
>:
>
>>there aren't enough bytes in the matter stream...
>
>Caused me to sit back and wonder just how empty nuxxy's life must be
>that posting his fact-free diatribes and being either ignored or
>ridiculed as a worthless lying troll, is somehow an attractive
>option when deciding how to use his time.


Which caused me to sit back and think how empty the ****wit Chapman's
life must be such that he has to maintain lists of famous people he
has met - and then post same on a web page so that we can all see just
how sad he is.


--
I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman)
Some evidence shows that helmeted cyclists are more likely to hit
their heads. (Guy Chapman)
I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy
Chapman) - proven to be an outright lie.
He then quickly changed his web page - but "forgot" to change the date
of last amendment

[judith]

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:50:39 GMT, Tim Dunne
> wrote:

>Nuxx Bar wrote:
>
>8<...
>
> _____________________
> /| /| | | |
> ||__|| | | Please don't feed |
> / O O\__ | the trolls... |
> / \ | thank you. |
> / \ \|_____________________|
> / _ \ \ ||
> / |\____\ \ ||
> / | | | |\____/ ||
> / \|_|_|/ | _||
> / / \ |____| ||
> / | | | --|
> | | | |____ --|
> * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
>*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
> / _ \\ | / `
>* / \_ /- | | |
> * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________


Ho, ho, ho - that was funny Tim - we've never seen that before.


You need to stick to analysing headers and then coming to a totally
wrong conclusion.



--
I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman)
Some evidence shows that helmeted cyclists are more likely to hit
their heads. (Guy Chapman)
I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy
Chapman) - proven to be an outright lie.
He then quickly changed his web page - but "forgot" to change the date
of last amendment

[Tim Dunne]

judith wrote:

8<...

_____________________
/| /| | | |
||__|| | | Please don't feed |
/ O O\__ | the trolls... |
/ \ | thank you. |
/ \ \|_____________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________



--
My hearts numbered beat | Greetings from Birmingham, UK
Still echoes in this empty room |All about me: www.nervouscyclist.org
Fear wells in me, but nothing seems| Is your ISP pimping your data?
Enough to defend Dave Matthews| www.badphorm.co.uk

[judith]

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:44:39 GMT, Tim Dunne
> wrote:

>judith wrote:
>
>8<...
>
> _____________________
> /| /| | | |
> ||__|| | | Please don't feed |
> / O O\__ | the trolls... |
> / \ | thank you. |
> / \ \|_____________________|
> / _ \ \ ||
> / |\____\ \ ||
> / | | | |\____/ ||
> / \|_|_|/ | _||
> / / \ |____| ||
> / | | | --|
> | | | |____ --|
> * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
>*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
> / _ \\ | / `
>* / \_ /- | | |
> * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

Keep them coming Tim - you're a laugh a minute.

(PS I bet some of the regulars are putting you in their kill-file now
- well done - still it proves you are a ****wit)



--
I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman)
Some evidence shows that helmeted cyclists are more likely to hit
their heads. (Guy Chapman)
I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy
Chapman) - proven to be an outright lie.
He then quickly changed his web page - but "forgot" to change the date
of last amendment