PDA

View Full Version : Re: A tale of two Mikes?


April 15th 10, 01:24 AM
On Apr 8, 9:16*pm, Bob Berger > wrote:

>
> The reduced carbon of the earth can be found in biota, coal, oil, NG
> and similar places. Coal, oil & NG are the products of biota that died
> and were buried millions of years ago. (However, it cannot be
> disproven that some oil and natural gas may be of abiotic origin.)
>
Ø All crude oil, natural gas, and coal is of abiotic origin.

..o0o.

> When O2 engages in inorganic
> redox chemistry, H2O is generated. So we have underestimated the
> quantity of oxygen by a significant factor. Hence, we should see even
> more reduced carbon than we do see.

Ø Nonsense!!!

> Any claim that oxygen came originally from photosynthetic metabolism
> ignores fundamentals of biochemistry. In the dark, plant matter
> consumes O2 to maintain metabolism, else it dies. Photosynthetic
> metabolism creates organic matter that stores energy that is available
> when the sun don't shine. The only life that does not need to store
> energy are viruses. Hence plants recycle O2 in both the forward and
> reverse direction. Organic plant matter can only be generated when the
> sun shines.

Ø Bull****!!!!

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes

Bob Berger[_2_]
April 15th 10, 02:01 AM
In article >,
says...
>
>On Apr 8, 9:16=A0pm, Bob Berger > wrote:
>
>>
>> The reduced carbon of the earth can be found in biota, coal, oil, NG
>> and similar places. Coal, oil & NG are the products of biota that died
>> and were buried millions of years ago. (However, it cannot be
>> disproven that some oil and natural gas may be of abiotic origin.)
>>
>=D8 All crude oil, natural gas, and coal is of abiotic origin.
>
>.o0o.
>
>> When O2 engages in inorganic
>> redox chemistry, H2O is generated. So we have underestimated the
>> quantity of oxygen by a significant factor. Hence, we should see even
>> more reduced carbon than we do see.
>
>=D8 Nonsense!!!
>
>> Any claim that oxygen came originally from photosynthetic metabolism
>> ignores fundamentals of biochemistry. In the dark, plant matter
>> consumes O2 to maintain metabolism, else it dies. Photosynthetic
>> metabolism creates organic matter that stores energy that is available
>> when the sun don't shine. The only life that does not need to store
>> energy are viruses. Hence plants recycle O2 in both the forward and
>> reverse direction. Organic plant matter can only be generated when the
>> sun shines.
>
>=D8 Bull****!!!!
>
> =97 =97
>| In real science the burden of proof is always
>| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
>| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
>| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
>| they provided data that climate change is being
>| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
>| natural causes

Relative to what I posted, your point is?

Google

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home