kat[_2_]
June 8th 10, 01:22 PM
David Hansen > said
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:05:15 +0100 someone who may be "kat"
> > wrote this:-
>
>> You did - because you immediately /assumed/ it was from Judith!
>
> Wrong, my mistake doesn't confirm anything, no matter how long and
> loud you try and claim otherwise.
>
> My mistake was simply due to not noticing the posting you were
> replying to was from Derek. I did get the wrong notion that it was
> from Judith, but that does not confirm what you claim it does.
Maybe only to myself, but it certainly supported a suspicion.
--
kat
>^..^<
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:05:15 +0100 someone who may be "kat"
> > wrote this:-
>
>> You did - because you immediately /assumed/ it was from Judith!
>
> Wrong, my mistake doesn't confirm anything, no matter how long and
> loud you try and claim otherwise.
>
> My mistake was simply due to not noticing the posting you were
> replying to was from Derek. I did get the wrong notion that it was
> from Judith, but that does not confirm what you claim it does.
Maybe only to myself, but it certainly supported a suspicion.
--
kat
>^..^<