Re: URCM : Blocking is Permanent

[JMS]

On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:07:51 +0100, David Hansen
> wrote:

>On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:53:25 +0100 someone who may be David Hansen
> wrote this:-
>
>>A perfectly reasonable question, expressed in perfectly reasonable
>>language. No 'psycholists', 'Lycra louts', 'the anti-helmet brigade'
>>or indeed '****wits' (Judith's favourite word in the past for anyone
>>who demonstrated her claims were wrong).
>
>Ooops, I muddled up Derek C and Judith.


Ooooops - just shows you jump to conclusions oh so easily.

Here is a female - mentioning helmets - oh yes - it must be Judith.

[Derek C]

On Jun 8, 3:49*pm, JMS > wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:07:51 +0100, David Hansen
>
> > wrote:
> >On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:53:25 +0100 someone who may be David Hansen
> > wrote this:-
>
> >>A perfectly reasonable question, expressed in perfectly reasonable
> >>language. No 'psycholists', 'Lycra louts', 'the anti-helmet brigade'
> >>or indeed '****wits' (Judith's favourite word in the past for anyone
> >>who demonstrated her claims were wrong).
>
> >Ooops, I muddled up Derek C and Judith.
>
> Ooooops - just shows you jump to conclusions oh so easily.
>
> Here is a female - mentioning helmets - oh yes - it must be Judith.

I was male last time I looked!

Derek C

[kat[_2_]]

Derek C > said
> On Jun 8, 3:49 pm, JMS > wrote:

>>> Ooops, I muddled up Derek C and Judith.
>>
>> Ooooops - just shows you jump to conclusions oh so easily.
>>
>> Here is a female - mentioning helmets - oh yes - it must be Judith.
>
> I was male last time I looked!
>

Ah yes, but he replied to me, and I am female. ;-)


--
kat
>^..^<