the law is clear: only one person on a normal bike. More Darwinism

[Mrcheerful[_2_]]

What a waste of a young life.

Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one person
only.

http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp

[thirty-six]

On 1 Nov, 19:04, "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
> What a waste of a young life.
>
> Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one person
> only.
>
> http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp

It does not say in this report what type of bike was used, where did
you get this additional information, out the air? They're are such
tyhings as tandem bicycles. As i see it it appears the driver is to
blame, something about the failure to observe the two junctions at the
brow of the hill.

[Tony Raven[_3_]]

"Mrcheerful" > wrote:
> What a waste of a young life.
>
> Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one
> person
> only.
>
> http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp

Sounds like that had very little to do with it according to he article:

"John Watkinson, also of Bentinck Road, added: "This is the third
fatality in a few years, more or less in the same part of the road.

"Drivers don't realise that there are two turns at the brow of the hill
- it is very dangerous." "

--
Tony

[Mrcheerful[_2_]]

Tony Raven wrote:
> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>> What a waste of a young life.
>>
>> Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one
>> person
>> only.
>>
>> http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp
>
> Sounds like that had very little to do with it according to he
> article:
>
> "John Watkinson, also of Bentinck Road, added: "This is the third
> fatality in a few years, more or less in the same part of the road.
>
> "Drivers don't realise that there are two turns at the brow of the
> hill - it is very dangerous." "

and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not contribute in
any way to the accident or the consequences?

[JNugent[_7_]]

On 01/11/2010 20:47, Mrcheerful wrote:

> Tony Raven wrote:
>> > wrote:

>>> What a waste of a young life.
>>> Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one
>>> person only.

>>> http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp

>> Sounds like that had very little to do with it according to he article:

>> "John Watkinson, also of Bentinck Road, added: "This is the third
>> fatality in a few years, more or less in the same part of the road.
>> "Drivers don't realise that there are two turns at the brow of the
>> hill - it is very dangerous." "

There is not a word in the article to suggest that the car-driver was to
blame, or that the "very dangerous" "two turns at the brow of the hill" were
anything to do with the cause of the collision.

> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not contribute in
> any way to the accident or the consequences?

There isn't anything to suggest that, either, although clearly, the situation
was less than ideal.

[Tony Raven[_3_]]

"Mrcheerful" > wrote:

> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
> contribute in
> any way to the accident or the consequences?

That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on the
Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware. But even
so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They were just
children after all.

--
Tony

[Mrcheerful[_2_]]

Tony Raven wrote:
> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>
>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>> contribute in
>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>
> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
> were just children after all.

and hopefully have not yet done any breeding

[The Medway Handyman[_3_]]

thirty-six wrote:
> On 1 Nov, 19:04, "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>> What a waste of a young life.
>>
>> Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one
>> person only.
>>
>> http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp
>
> It does not say in this report what type of bike was used, where did
> you get this additional information, out the air? They're are such
> tyhings as tandem bicycles.

For ****s sake. Are you so ****ing stupid as to believe they were on a
tandem?

You just won Mr Teflon 2010.

FX<Scraping bottom of barrel>FX


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.

[Derek C]

On Nov 2, 1:02*am, "The Medway Handyman" <davidno-spam-
> wrote:
> thirty-six wrote:
> > On 1 Nov, 19:04, "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
> >> What a waste of a young life.
>
> >> Typical untrained cyclist, doesn't know that a solo bike means one
> >> person only.
>
> >>http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Cyclist-12-killed-after-car.6607240.jp
>
> > It does not say in this report what type of bike was used, where did
> > you get this additional information, out the air? *They're are such
> > tyhings as tandem bicycles.
>
> For ****s sake. *Are you so ****ing stupid as to believe they were on a
> tandem?
>
> You just won Mr Teflon 2010.
>
> FX<Scraping bottom of barrel>FX
>
> --
Come on Meds! You must know by now that all cyclists are Saint-like
characters who can do no wrong, and accidents are always the fault of
evil motorists!

[Tony Raven[_3_]]

"Mrcheerful" > wrote:
> Tony Raven wrote:
>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>
>>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>>> contribute in
>>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>>
>> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
>> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
>> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
>> were just children after all.
>
> and hopefully have not yet done any breeding

What is that supposed to mean? Are you a fan of eugenics?

--
Tony

[Mrcheerful[_2_]]

"Tony Raven" > wrote in message
...
> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>> Tony Raven wrote:
>>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>>>> contribute in
>>>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>>>
>>> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
>>> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
>>> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
>>> were just children after all.
>>
>> and hopefully have not yet done any breeding
>
> What is that supposed to mean? Are you a fan of eugenics?
>

Absolutely.
Removing morons from the gene pool can only improve the chances of following
generations.

[Just zis Guy, you know?[_33_]]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/11/2010 07:54, Mrcheerful wrote:

>> Are you a fan of eugenics?

> Absolutely.
> Removing morons from the gene pool can only improve the chances of following
> generations.

Off to top yourself, then? We'll miss you. Not.
- --
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
PGP public ket at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMz8osAAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/tUMH+wUEXn96fj71haDjX0napxir
kfoj2zbu3W0OkMY7St30T8t1iscOL+KGTFhDnGlzeYmKVKHV2T O6FKzQmf9k8fCH
6MG/Ds1/raKdGi1V2v6MYXFo5udP7bseesjyHDExiLvmENWl9mk5dF3+GV akyRcH
S/nmnDixa+i5aP8/mhYgR5s2uaR/Uecx/xuypUWzfADeqnBzQTwCXdGCgjsYMW/7
E0Cdtvz7tvytQjrskJA+pMuVxOWu+JrIvPoAlGYVit7B2vYHS1 Mg4gC0AltpuotQ
a9EAWBIWcuRgVebv1AVfDuJ/jaMQ5YTV8O3/k1V1hrnne1UMbDn9TN6Nl+/PD10=
=xUl0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Mrcheerful[_2_]]

"Just zis Guy, you know?" > wrote in message
...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/11/2010 07:54, Mrcheerful wrote:
>
>>> Are you a fan of eugenics?
>
>> Absolutely.
>> Removing morons from the gene pool can only improve the chances of
>> following
>> generations.
>
> Off to top yourself, then? We'll miss you. Not.

people often dislike others simply because of their views.

[Tony Raven[_3_]]

Mrcheerful wrote:
> "Tony Raven" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>> Tony Raven wrote:
>>>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>>>>> contribute in
>>>>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>>>> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
>>>> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
>>>> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
>>>> were just children after all.
>>> and hopefully have not yet done any breeding
>> What is that supposed to mean? Are you a fan of eugenics?
>>
>
> Absolutely.
> Removing morons from the gene pool can only improve the chances of following
> generations.
>

Eradicating children for being children is a bit radical but it will
solve over-population, global warming and a whole range of societal
issues at a stroke.

Tony

[Just zis Guy, you know?[_33_]]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/11/2010 08:28, Mrcheerful wrote:

> people often dislike others simply because of their views.

Gosh, really? You mean that people might, oh, I don't know, engage in a
years-long campaign of harassment and defamation just because they don't
like someone not believing Paul Smith's crank theory?

- --
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
PGP public ket at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMz8zzAAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/VRsH/09It2QAGDNchBNqBAKoMUfq
8bzi917ykGg/J9gypQMoIdAbXMErb3cPspap/dyjc4EGXwm68b/8sAMmN+33OKzt
oHeProxZfFzE3K/wItUPg/8gcl9TBcoy3ouickNkOeuga3KGqixx+qT2+NGvolki
OdD/UEQL5ns/nsBcFT6hb3v7acFcp38sRsR3M62Go/ejn2D9Ddm3MmcU3VrqGHOv
zkAyVUoWq9eWOJpSTgWUiWOY/JITipfagGgKfRkWPKCo05ybdBpNuYarSG+rFZ47
lgs0Z4CKeglOsSBstlZnvUX/sq+f00eijI/ahfwdv4wShL7OTekpAPQsn9o1850=
=X1n0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Simon Mason]

"Mrcheerful" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Tony Raven" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>> Tony Raven wrote:
>>>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>>>>> contribute in
>>>>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>>>>
>>>> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
>>>> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
>>>> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
>>>> were just children after all.
>>>
>>> and hopefully have not yet done any breeding
>>
>> What is that supposed to mean? Are you a fan of eugenics?
>>
>
> Absolutely. (Yes?)
> Removing morons from the gene pool can only improve the chances of
> following generations.
>

What would you do about that 52 year old grandmother who was killed after a
lorry's shed load killed her?
Since her genes have already been passed on to two generations, should all
of her progeny be rounded up and gassed?


--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

[Mrcheerful[_2_]]

"Simon Mason" > wrote in message
. uk...
>
> "Mrcheerful" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Tony Raven" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>>> Tony Raven wrote:
>>>>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>>>>>> contribute in
>>>>>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
>>>>> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
>>>>> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
>>>>> were just children after all.
>>>>
>>>> and hopefully have not yet done any breeding
>>>
>>> What is that supposed to mean? Are you a fan of eugenics?
>>>
>>
>> Absolutely. (Yes?)
>> Removing morons from the gene pool can only improve the chances of
>> following generations.
>>
>
> What would you do about that 52 year old grandmother who was killed after
> a lorry's shed load killed her?
> Since her genes have already been passed on to two generations, should all
> of her progeny be rounded up and gassed?
>
>
> --
> Simon Mason
> http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

I would suggest that a lethal injection that leaves the organs still going
for donation would be a better solution.

Testing before allowing breeding is the way forward.

[The Medway Handyman[_3_]]

Tony Raven wrote:
> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>> Tony Raven wrote:
>>> "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> and a wobbly overloaded bicycle is perfectly safe and did not
>>>> contribute in
>>>> any way to the accident or the consequences?
>>>
>>> That's your interpretation. What they were doing is very common on
>>> the Continent and causes very little problem as far as I am aware.
>>> But even so did the driver not see them and take extra care? They
>>> were just children after all.
>>
>> and hopefully have not yet done any breeding
>
> What is that supposed to mean? Are you a fan of eugenics?

Always liked than Annie Lennox.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.