Free Lap Dance

[Jute Andre]

Lance "The Transfuser" Armstrong's cycling legacy is doubtful because
he's a ****ing cheater with a big ****ing extended travel Lear Jet
that he got because you lame ****ers sent him your money to save your
family member from cancer when you could have sent it directly to the
American Cancer Society or to any cancer fighting organization of your
dreams.

[Choppy Warburton]

We all agree Jammie

[Phil]

On Feb 18, 4:29*pm, Choppy Warburton >
wrote:
> We all agree Jammie

And I bet you had a problem raising the $150 for the MS150 charity
ride....what a dip****!

that LAF is one of the most successful cancers charities out there
with more of its $ going towards the program than
any other cancer charity including the American cancer Society.

Millions upon millions of $ raised by the LAF that would have not been
there for cancer research if the wonderful volunteers
had not put in countless hours in to make it work and yes, had LA not
started the fund and lent his name to it.

Lance gets no monetary reimbursement for it.

for more about the fund read this from a Charity Rating service.


http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570

[--D-y]

On Feb 18, 11:29*am, Choppy Warburton >
wrote:
> We all agree Jammie

No "we" don't. "All". "Agree".

That was pretty funny, actually. Do some critical examination of the
American Cancer Society, for starters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Cancer_Society

Get a life. You're welcome!
--D-y

[Anton Berlin]

On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 4:29*pm, Choppy Warburton >
> wrote:
>
> > We all agree Jammie
>
> And I bet you had a problem raising the $150 for the MS150 charity
> ride....what a dip****!
>
> that LAF is one of the most successful cancers charities out there
> with more of its $ going towards the program than
> any other cancer charity including the American cancer Society.
>
> Millions upon millions of $ raised by the LAF that would have not been
> there for cancer research if the wonderful volunteers
> had not put in countless hours in to make it work and yes, *had LA not
> started the fund and lent his name to it.
>
> Lance gets no monetary reimbursement for it.
>
> for more about the fund read this from a Charity Rating service.
>
> * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570

Dick for brains - we already covered this. LAF wastes more than half
of their money on 'fundraising' and spending 10s of thousands of
donation dollars to fl his family to Australia and New Zealand in
order to raise $463 at the Queenstown YMCA and have some local rubes
get their photo in the paper with the worlds biggest self inflicted
cancer fraud and dope fiend.

Besides they found the cure for cancer and it turns out Randy Newman
was dreadfully wrong. LA sucks (both the city and the cyclist) and
short peole do have a reason

[RicodJour]

On Feb 19, 10:54*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
>
> > that LAF is one of the most successful cancers charities out there
> > with more of its $ going towards the program than
> > any other cancer charity including the American cancer Society.
>
> > Millions upon millions of $ raised by the LAF that would have not been
> > there for cancer research if the wonderful volunteers
> > had not put in countless hours in to make it work and yes, *had LA not
> > started the fund and lent his name to it.
>
> > Lance gets no monetary reimbursement for it.
>
> > for more about the fund read this from a Charity Rating service.
>
> > * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570
>
> Dick for brains - we already covered this. *LAF wastes more than half
> of their money on 'fundraising'

I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. What exactly
does "half of their money" mean? More importantly, whatever you think
you meant is simply contrary to the facts.

It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
provided. Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
Spanky. The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
spends 10%. Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue. It
may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
admirably.

R

[Zenon]

On Feb 19, 8:26*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> On Feb 19, 10:54*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
>
> > > that LAF is one of the most successful cancers charities out there
> > > with more of its $ going towards the program than
> > > any other cancer charity including the American cancer Society.
>
> > > Millions upon millions of $ raised by the LAF that would have not been
> > > there for cancer research if the wonderful volunteers
> > > had not put in countless hours in to make it work and yes, *had LA not
> > > started the fund and lent his name to it.
>
> > > Lance gets no monetary reimbursement for it.
>
> > > for more about the fund read this from a Charity Rating service.
>
> > > * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570
>
> > Dick for brains - we already covered this. *LAF wastes more than half
> > of their money on 'fundraising'
>
> I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
> combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. *What exactly
> does "half of their money" mean? *More importantly, whatever you think
> you meant is simply contrary to the facts.
>
> It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
> provided. *Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
> Spanky. *The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
> spends 10%. *Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue. *It
> may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
> could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
> admirably.
>
> R- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

**** all of you Lance cum guzzlers. He got his money by cheating so
shut the **** up. There would be no LAF if he wouldn't have cheated
to get his ****ing dirty money.

[--D-y]

On Feb 19, 1:31*pm, Zenon > wrote:
> On Feb 19, 8:26*am, RicodJour > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 10:54*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
>
> > > > that LAF is one of the most successful cancers charities out there
> > > > with more of its $ going towards the program than
> > > > any other cancer charity including the American cancer Society.
>
> > > > Millions upon millions of $ raised by the LAF that would have not been
> > > > there for cancer research if the wonderful volunteers
> > > > had not put in countless hours in to make it work and yes, *had LA not
> > > > started the fund and lent his name to it.
>
> > > > Lance gets no monetary reimbursement for it.
>
> > > > for more about the fund read this from a Charity Rating service.
>
> > > > * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570
>
> > > Dick for brains - we already covered this. *LAF wastes more than half
> > > of their money on 'fundraising'
>
> > I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
> > combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. *What exactly
> > does "half of their money" mean? *More importantly, whatever you think
> > you meant is simply contrary to the facts.
>
> > It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
> > provided. *Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
> > Spanky. *The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
> > spends 10%. *Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue. *It
> > may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
> > could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
> > admirably.
>
> > R- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> **** all of you Lance cum guzzlers. *He got his money by cheating so
> shut the **** up. *There would be no LAF if he wouldn't have cheated
> to get his ****ing dirty money.

Most if not all were doping, so you are stupid.
--D-y

[RicodJour]

On Feb 19, 2:31*pm, Zenon > wrote:
> On Feb 19, 8:26*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 10:54*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
>
> > > > * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570
>
> > > Dick for brains - we already covered this. *LAF wastes more than half
> > > of their money on 'fundraising'
>
> > I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
> > combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. *What exactly
> > does "half of their money" mean? *More importantly, whatever you think
> > you meant is simply contrary to the facts.
>
> > It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
> > provided. *Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
> > Spanky. *The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
> > spends 10%. *Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue. *It
> > may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
> > could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
> > admirably.
>
>
> **** all of you Lance cum guzzlers. *He got his money by cheating so
> shut the **** up. *There would be no LAF if he wouldn't have cheated
> to get his ****ing dirty money.

Oh, well then, I guess it's a good thing he cheated. Otherwise people
donating to the big cancer charity would see an extra 10% of their
money being ****ed away. I guess he's kind of like Robin Hood when
you put it that way. Thanks for pointing this out.

R

[Zenon]

On Feb 19, 2:18*pm, RicodJour > wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2:31*pm, Zenon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 8:26*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 10:54*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
>
> > > > > * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search..summary&orgid=6570
>
> > > > Dick for brains - we already covered this. *LAF wastes more than half
> > > > of their money on 'fundraising'
>
> > > I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
> > > combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. *What exactly
> > > does "half of their money" mean? *More importantly, whatever you think
> > > you meant is simply contrary to the facts.
>
> > > It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
> > > provided. *Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
> > > Spanky. *The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
> > > spends 10%. *Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue. *It
> > > may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
> > > could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
> > > admirably.
>
> > **** all of you Lance cum guzzlers. *He got his money by cheating so
> > shut the **** up. *There would be no LAF if he wouldn't have cheated
> > to get his ****ing dirty money.
>
> Oh, well then, I guess it's a good thing he cheated. *Otherwise people
> donating to the big cancer charity would see an extra 10% of their
> money being ****ed away. *I guess he's kind of like Robin Hood when
> you put it that way. *Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> R- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Since everyone was doping that makes it okay for dick head. Thanks
for pointing that out. So if the Italian Mafia sets up a way to
launder money, and if the front is a foundation to cure cancer, that
makes it okay. Oh I see, now I'm with you. What the **** is wrong
with you mental midgets? Lancie pooh created a myth and you bought
it. What a bunch of dumb ****s.

[Frederick the Great]

In article
>,
Zenon > wrote:

> On Feb 19, 2:18Â*pm, RicodJour > wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2:31Â*pm, Zenon > wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 8:26Â*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 19, 10:54Â*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 19, 1:34Â*am, Phil > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Â* Â* Â*http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570
> >
> > > > > Dick for brains - we already covered this. Â*LAF wastes more than half
> > > > > of their money on 'fundraising'
> >
> > > > I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
> > > > combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. Â*What exactly
> > > > does "half of their money" mean? Â*More importantly, whatever you think
> > > > you meant is simply contrary to the facts.
> >
> > > > It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
> > > > provided. Â*Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
> > > > Spanky. Â*The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
> > > > spends 10%. Â*Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue. Â*It
> > > > may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
> > > > could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
> > > > admirably.
> >
> > > **** all of you Lance cum guzzlers. Â*He got his money by cheating so
> > > shut the **** up. Â*There would be no LAF if he wouldn't have cheated
> > > to get his ****ing dirty money.
> >
> > Oh, well then, I guess it's a good thing he cheated. Â*Otherwise people
> > donating to the big cancer charity would see an extra 10% of their
> > money being ****ed away. Â*I guess he's kind of like Robin Hood when
> > you put it that way. Â*Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Since everyone was doping that makes it okay for dick head. Thanks
> for pointing that out. So if the Italian Mafia sets up a way to
> launder money, and if the front is a foundation to cure cancer, that
> makes it okay. Oh I see, now I'm with you. What the **** is wrong
> with you mental midgets? Lancie pooh created a myth and you bought
> it. What a bunch of dumb ****s.

What kind of name is Zenon?
Is that a character from Buck Rogers?
The princess Buck rogers then dumps for Dahlia?

--
Old Fritz

[RicodJour]

On Feb 20, 3:38*am, Frederick the Great > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
> *Zenon > wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2:18*pm, RicodJour > wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 2:31*pm, Zenon > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 19, 8:26*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 19, 10:54*am, Anton Berlin > wrote:
> > > > > > On Feb 19, 1:34*am, Phil > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > * * *http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6570
>
> > > > > > Dick for brains - we already covered this. *LAF wastes more than half
> > > > > > of their money on 'fundraising'
>
> > > > > I would point out for our readers that you have rather inexpertly
> > > > > combined weaselly phrasing and candayassing LANCE-abuse. *What exactly
> > > > > does "half of their money" mean? *More importantly, whatever you think
> > > > > you meant is simply contrary to the facts.
>
> > > > > It's obvious that you didn't bother clicking on the link Phil
> > > > > provided. *Do yourself a favor and click-through to an edumacation,
> > > > > Spanky. *The American Cancer Society spends 20% on fundraising and LAF
> > > > > spends 10%. *Then check out the relative sizes of their revenue.. *It
> > > > > may surprise you that anyone or anything without the name Kardassian
> > > > > could be more of an attention whore than LANCE - yet the ACS succeeds
> > > > > admirably.
>
> > > > **** all of you Lance cum guzzlers. *He got his money by cheating so
> > > > shut the **** up. *There would be no LAF if he wouldn't have cheated
> > > > to get his ****ing dirty money.
>
> > > Oh, well then, I guess it's a good thing he cheated. *Otherwise people
> > > donating to the big cancer charity would see an extra 10% of their
> > > money being ****ed away. *I guess he's kind of like Robin Hood when
> > > you put it that way. *Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> > Since everyone was doping that makes it okay for dick head. *Thanks
> > for pointing that out. *So if the Italian Mafia sets up a way to
> > launder money, and if the front is a foundation to cure cancer, that
> > makes it okay. *Oh I see, now I'm with you. *What the **** is wrong
> > with you mental midgets? *Lancie pooh created a myth and you bought
> > it. *What a bunch of dumb ****s.
>
> What kind of name is Zenon?
> Is that a character from Buck Rogers?
> The princess Buck rogers then dumps for Dahlia?

At first I thought it was one of the Noble Gases that I hadn't heard
of. It would seem to explain him being full of gas. But it seems I
was wrong about the Noble Gas and the gender - in fact it's actually
her real name.

Memorable quotes for
Zenon: Girl of the 21st Century (1999) (TV) More at IMDbPro »

Mr. Windom: I refuse to engage in a name-calling contest with a
teenager.
Zenon: That's because you know you'll lose!

Zenon: ONE sin minor and my life is a living black hole!

Mark Kar: Honey, what if your tether broke or we were suddenly
bombarded by a meteor shower?
Zenon: I can take care of myself now, I'm 13!
Mark Kar: Then you better start ACTING like it.


Clearly her tether broke.

R

[Simply Fred]

Frederick the Great wrote:
> What kind of name is Zenon?
> Is that a character from Buck Rogers?
> The princess Buck rogers then dumps for Dahlia?


Or just another Ron Jeremy:
<http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=lzenon/gender=m/lawrence-zenon.htm>

[Fredmaster of Brainerd]

On Feb 20, 9:56*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> On Feb 20, 3:38*am, Frederick the Great > wrote:
>
> > What kind of name is Zenon?
> > Is that a character from Buck Rogers?
> > The princess Buck rogers then dumps for Dahlia?
>
> At first I thought it was one of the Noble Gases that I hadn't heard
> of. *It would seem to explain him being full of gas. *But it seems I
> was wrong about the Noble Gas and the gender - in fact it's actually
> her real name.
>
> Memorable quotes for
> Zenon: Girl of the 21st Century (1999) (TV)

Dumbasses,

Are you guys morons, or just imitating morons?

I got your Zenon right here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkDRdHJU--Y

Damn things were so much better when they
wore caps instead of helmets and there wasn't
any dope.

Fredmaster Ben
-and I was 17 years younger

[H. Fred Kveck]

In article
>,
Fredmaster of Brainerd > wrote:

> On Feb 20, 9:56*am, RicodJour > wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 3:38*am, Frederick the Great > wrote:
> >
> > > What kind of name is Zenon?
> > > Is that a character from Buck Rogers?
> > > The princess Buck rogers then dumps for Dahlia?
> >
> > At first I thought it was one of the Noble Gases that I hadn't heard
> > of. *It would seem to explain him being full of gas. *But it seems I
> > was wrong about the Noble Gas and the gender - in fact it's actually
> > her real name.
> >
> > Memorable quotes for
> > Zenon: Girl of the 21st Century (1999) (TV)
>
> Dumbasses,
>
> Are you guys morons, or just imitating morons?
>
> I got your Zenon right here:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkDRdHJU--Y
>
> Damn things were so much better when they
> wore caps instead of helmets and there wasn't
> any dope.
>
> Fredmaster Ben
> -and I was 17 years younger

Well, my newsreader shows his 'reply to' address as being
'zenon_jaskula@etc etc' so I assumed those guys noticed it too. I always
thought ZJ (the real one) looked like he was suffering from the minute he
got on his bike. His hats and hairnets were always tipped to one side.

[RicodJour]

On Feb 20, 10:46*pm, "H. Fred Kveck" >
wrote:
>
> * *Well, my newsreader shows his 'reply to' address as being
> 'zenon_jaskula@etc etc' so I assumed those guys noticed it too. I always
> thought ZJ (the real one) looked like he was suffering from the minute he
> got on his bike. His hats and hairnets were always tipped to one side.

That's called jaunty.

R

[Simply Fred]

H. Fred Kveck wrote:
> Well, my newsreader shows his 'reply to' address as being
> 'zenon_jaskula@etc etc' so I assumed those guys noticed it too. I always
> thought ZJ (the real one) looked like he was suffering from the minute he
> got on his bike. His hats and hairnets were always tipped to one side.

Perhaps he had a leg length discrepancy he was trying to balance out.