Unwarranted aggression and discrimination towards cyclists

[M Wicks]

Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:

* A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
me.
* A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
lawfully.
* A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).

Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
wrong. So I can only suppose that these people were behaving in this
way simply because I was cycling. It really is too much, and if hotel
owners are going to be successfully sued for 'discrimination' just
because they don't want sinful disease-spreading 'gays' (for whom it /
is/ a choice) to be doing their disgusting thing on their property,
then surely those who discriminate against cyclists should also be
outside the law and thus made to face the consequences.

I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
responsible one which is helping the general population. Why don't
these ridiculous people do something useful instead? Judith, were you
the portly middle-aged woman? Is it time for cyclists to lobby their
MPs for a bill which will tackle this unreasonable and intimidating
behaviour? Every time I go out cycling, I wonder if someone will go
too far and I will end up in hospital. It simply isn't right.

[Mrcheerful[_3_]]

M Wicks wrote:
> Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
> * A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
> related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
> me.
> * A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
> it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
> did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
> lawfully.
> * A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
> part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
> 'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
> rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
> shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
> towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).
>
> Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
> provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
> wrong. So I can only suppose that these people were behaving in this
> way simply because I was cycling. It really is too much, and if hotel
> owners are going to be successfully sued for 'discrimination' just
> because they don't want sinful disease-spreading 'gays' (for whom it /
> is/ a choice) to be doing their disgusting thing on their property,
> then surely those who discriminate against cyclists should also be
> outside the law and thus made to face the consequences.
>
> I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
> I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
> responsible one which is helping the general population. Why don't
> these ridiculous people do something useful instead? Judith, were you
> the portly middle-aged woman? Is it time for cyclists to lobby their
> MPs for a bill which will tackle this unreasonable and intimidating
> behaviour? Every time I go out cycling, I wonder if someone will go
> too far and I will end up in hospital. It simply isn't right.

I know an easy way for you to avoid such upsetting circumstances.

[Mr Pounder]

"M Wicks" > wrote in message
...
> Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
> * A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
> related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
> me.
> * A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
> it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
> did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
> lawfully.
> * A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
> part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
> 'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
> rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
> shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
> towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).
>
> Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
> provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
> wrong. So I can only suppose that these people were behaving in this
> way simply because I was cycling. It really is too much, and if hotel
> owners are going to be successfully sued for 'discrimination' just
> because they don't want sinful disease-spreading 'gays' (for whom it /
> is/ a choice) to be doing their disgusting thing on their property,
> then surely those who discriminate against cyclists should also be
> outside the law and thus made to face the consequences.
>
> I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
> I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
> responsible one which is helping the general population. Why don't
> these ridiculous people do something useful instead? Judith, were you
> the portly middle-aged woman? Is it time for cyclists to lobby their
> MPs for a bill which will tackle this unreasonable and intimidating
> behaviour? Every time I go out cycling, I wonder if someone will go
> too far and I will end up in hospital. It simply isn't right.


How does it feel to be so despised?
We need to know.

[Squashme]

On May 20, 6:15*pm, "Mrcheerful" > wrote:
> M Wicks wrote:
> > Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> > with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> > confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> > anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> > just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> > should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
> > * A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
> > related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
> > me.
> > * A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
> > it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
> > did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
> > lawfully.
> > * A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
> > part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
> > 'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
> > rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
> > shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
> > towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).
>
> > Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
> > provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
> > wrong. So I can only suppose that these people were behaving in this
> > way simply because I was cycling. It really is too much, and if hotel
> > owners are going to be successfully sued for 'discrimination' just
> > because they don't want sinful disease-spreading 'gays' (for whom it /
> > is/ a choice) to be doing their disgusting thing on their property,
> > then surely those who discriminate against cyclists should also be
> > outside the law and thus made to face the consequences.
>
> > I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
> > I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
> > responsible one which is helping the general population. Why don't
> > these ridiculous people do something useful instead? Judith, were you
> > the portly middle-aged woman? Is it time for cyclists to lobby their
> > MPs for a bill which will tackle this unreasonable and intimidating
> > behaviour? Every time I go out cycling, I wonder if someone will go
> > too far and I will end up in hospital. It simply isn't right.
>
> I know an easy way for you to avoid such upsetting circumstances.

Not everybody is comfortable with using a blade.

[Squashme]

On May 20, 7:00*pm, "Mr Pounder" >
wrote:
> "M Wicks" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> > with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> > confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> > anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> > just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> > should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
> > * A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
> > related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
> > me.
> > * A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
> > it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
> > did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
> > lawfully.
> > * A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
> > part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
> > 'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
> > rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
> > shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
> > towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).
>
> > Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
> > provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
> > wrong. So I can only suppose that these people were behaving in this
> > way simply because I was cycling. It really is too much, and if hotel
> > owners are going to be successfully sued for 'discrimination' just
> > because they don't want sinful disease-spreading 'gays' (for whom it /
> > is/ a choice) to be doing their disgusting thing on their property,
> > then surely those who discriminate against cyclists should also be
> > outside the law and thus made to face the consequences.
>
> > I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
> > I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
> > responsible one which is helping the general population. Why don't
> > these ridiculous people do something useful instead? Judith, were you
> > the portly middle-aged woman? Is it time for cyclists to lobby their
> > MPs for a bill which will tackle this unreasonable and intimidating
> > behaviour? Every time I go out cycling, I wonder if someone will go
> > too far and I will end up in hospital. It simply isn't right.
>
> How does it feel to be so despised?
> We need to know.

If you don't know by now what it feels like to be despised ...

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 20/05/2012 18:08, M Wicks wrote:
> Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
> * A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
> related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
> me.

He called you a ******? Entirely accurate way of describing an adult on
a push bike. If you don't want to be called a ****** don't act like one.

> * A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
> it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
> did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
> lawfully.

Fanta cans are notoriously inaccurate - especially when empty.

> * A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
> part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
> 'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
> rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
> shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
> towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).

Demonstrates nicely why shared paths are a bad idea. Cyclists should
remain in the gutter where they belong.
>
> Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
> provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
> wrong. So I can only suppose that these people were behaving in this
> way simply because I was cycling.

Finally it dawns on him! At last you realise that nobody likes cyclists!

> It really is too much, and if hotel
> owners are going to be successfully sued for 'discrimination' just
> because they don't want sinful disease-spreading 'gays' (for whom it /
> is/ a choice) to be doing their disgusting thing on their property,
> then surely those who discriminate against cyclists should also be
> outside the law and thus made to face the consequences.

Oooh! A trifle homophobic there.
>
> I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
> I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
> responsible one which is helping the general population.

The general population clearly don't want to be helped. They just think
you are a bell end.

> Why don't
> these ridiculous people do something useful instead? Judith, were you
> the portly middle-aged woman? Is it time for cyclists to lobby their
> MPs for a bill which will tackle this unreasonable and intimidating
> behaviour?

Perhaps if cyclists paid their way someone would listen. As it is, you
are just sponging freeloaders.

> Every time I go out cycling, I wonder if someone will go
> too far and I will end up in hospital. It simply isn't right.

Never mind diddums. Your fridge freezer insurance will cover the
medical bills.


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Judith[_4_]]

On Sun, 20 May 2012 10:08:17 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:

>Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
>with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
>confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
>anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
>just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
>should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
>* A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
>related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
>me.
>* A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
>it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
>did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
>lawfully.
>* A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
>part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
>'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
>rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
>shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
>towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).
>
>Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
>provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
>wrong.

Perhaps they spotted that you were a ****wit.



>Judith, were you
>the portly middle-aged woman?

No - and **** off.

[M Wicks]

On May 20, 11:25*pm, Judith > wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2012 10:08:17 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:
> >Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> >with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> >confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> >anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> >just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> >should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>
> >* A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
> >related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
> >me.
> >* A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
> >it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
> >did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
> >lawfully.
> >* A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
> >part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting
> >'Watch it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having
> >rung my bell and slowed right down due to her being where she
> >shouldn't have been, and despite the fact that she had been walking
> >towards me (and so should have seen me coming from a long way off).
>
> >Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
> >provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything
> >wrong.
>
> Perhaps they spotted that you were a f**kwit.

How dare you keep swearing at me? I will not stand for it, do you
hear?

> >Judith, were you
> >the portly middle-aged woman?
>
> No - and f**k off.

Well at least you actually answered a question this time, before
descending back to the usual two words. It is a shame that you
carefully evade most other questions that are put to you. The real
cyclists here (i.e. not Mr. Benn) are more than happy to answer any
and all reasonable questions (not inane trolling ones), so why can't
you? Something to hide? Why do you repeatedly fail to reply to posts
which ask you tough questions or debunk one of your 'points', only to
then make those 'points' again at a later date? Are you just here to
troll cyclists, Judith?

[Mr Benn[_5_]]

"M Wicks" > wrote in message
...
> Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
> with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
> confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if
> anything I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be
> just to be on the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I
> should), I experienced the following incidents from strangers:

You poor little flower.

[Mr Benn[_5_]]

"M Wicks" > wrote in message
...

> The real
> cyclists here (i.e. not Mr. Benn)

Excuse me. I own a bicycle and I use it for mainly recreational use at
weekends during the summer. I also use it for going to the local shop 1
mile away when the weather is dry.

I am a cyclist.

Your apology will be appreciated.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Sun, 20 May 2012 23:25:09 +0100, Judith wrote:

> On Sun, 20 May 2012 10:08:17 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks >
> wrote:
>
>>Today, I rode on a round trip of approximately 3 miles to have lunch
>>with my sister's family. Although I do not ride in an aggressive or
>>confrontational way, and I do not look for trouble (in fact if anything
>>I am probably a little more timid than I should have to be just to be on
>>the safe side, and do not 'take the lane' as much as I should), I
>>experienced the following incidents from strangers:
>>
>>* A particularly inbred-looking youth shouting an offensive onanism-
>>related term at me out of a car's passenger window as the car overtook
>>me.
>>* A driver coming the other way 'disposing' of a Fanta can by throwing
>>it at me (and missing by a long way, but that is hardly the point). I
>>did of course pick up the Fanta can and dispose of it correctly and
>>lawfully.
>>* A rather portly middle-aged woman wandering all over the 'cycling'
>>part of a shared-use path, on her mobile phone, and then shouting 'Watch
>>it!' very aggressively when I passed her, despite me having rung my bell
>>and slowed right down due to her being where she shouldn't have been,
>>and despite the fact that she had been walking towards me (and so should
>>have seen me coming from a long way off).
>>
>>Sadly, this is pretty typical for me when cycling. I did nothing to
>>provoke the above incidents and generally I do little if anything wrong.
>
> Perhaps they spotted that you were a ****wit.
>
>
>
>>Judith, were you the portly middle-aged woman?
>
> No - and **** off.

No.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:

<snip>


>Well at least you actually answered a question this time, before
>descending back to the usual two words. It is a shame that you
>carefully evade most other questions that are put to you. The real
>cyclists here (i.e. not Mr. Benn) are more than happy to answer any
>and all reasonable questions (not inane trolling ones), so why can't
>you? Something to hide? Why do you repeatedly fail to reply to posts
>which ask you tough questions or debunk one of your 'points', only to
>then make those 'points' again at a later date? Are you just here to
>troll

Sorry - sunshine - I had forgotten that you were a ****wit.

Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.

Just tell me what are these tough questions that I have been asked but not
responded to - I will answer you.

Effectiveness of cycle helmets or something?

Perhaps the difference between the testing techniques of cycle helmets and
motor cycle helmets?

The definitive response to "can cyclists legally jump read traffic lights"


Just ask the question, and I will oblige.



(PS I do not answer questions about god; well politely anyway)

[Simon Mason[_4_]]

On May 20, 6:08*pm, M Wicks > wrote:

>
> I am sick and tired of experiencing this low-level unpleasantness when
> I am out and about, especially when my chosen form of transport is a
> responsible one which is helping the general population. Why don't
> these ridiculous people do something useful instead?

Don't worry about it, after a few years you get used to it and instead
end up pitying the poor sods stuck in traffic like this.

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/roadworks.wmv

--
Simon Mason

[Justin[_3_]]

On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:

> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):

>Cyclists are road scum.

This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.

[Mr Benn[_5_]]

"Justin" > wrote in message
...
> On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks >
>> wrote:
>
>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
>>Cyclists are road scum.
>
> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>

I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. Perhaps it
is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>
> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. Perhaps it
>is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>confrontation
Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act. I will pray for his
(Dave's) forgiveness and enlightenment.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis..
> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>
> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps it
> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.

Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.

I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.

[Mr Benn[_5_]]

"Justin" > wrote in message
...
> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
>> "Justin" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>> >> >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>> >> basis.
>> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. Perhaps
>> it
>> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>
> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.

I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal cyclists
and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not scum.
Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are scum.
You're one of them.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 21 mei, 14:08, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> >> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> >> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >> >> basis.
> >> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> >> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps
> >> it
> >> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
> >> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>
> > Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> > scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> > I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal cyclists
> and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not scum.
Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act. I will pray for his
(Dave's) forgiveness and enlightenment.
> Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are scum.
It is a pity you need need to resort to libel.
Which laws can you prove I have broken? Does the law breaking have to
restrict itself to issues relating to road use? Or is any instance of
law breaking sufficient? How regular and hoe frequent does the law
breaking have to be?
You state that I am "militant". What proof do you have of that? Again,
is this cycling militancy or general militancy?

You say I hate all other road users. Show us some proof of that.
I have two cars, one of which I particularly fond (a classic car).
This is sometimes driven by other family members whilst I am on my
bike. Are you actually saying that I hate both my own classic car and
the family member behind its steering wheel whilst I am cycling?
When I finish cycling and go for a drive in one of my cars, would you
still refer to me as a law-breaking militant cyclist who hates all
oher road users?
When I am in the team car in a cycling race (for the junior club
members) am I a law-breaking militant cyclist?
> You're one of them.
Your argument is completely flawed and libelous.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 21/05/2012 12:39, Justin wrote:
> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M >
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. Perhaps it
>> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>
> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.

I thought you had buggered off?
>
> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.

Another god botherer?
--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[M Wicks]

On May 21, 8:04*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 21/05/2012 12:39, Justin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > *wrote:
> >> > *wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> >>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > *wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M >
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
> >>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> >>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps it
> >> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
> >> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>
> > Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> > scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> I thought you had buggered off?
>
>
>
> > I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> Another god botherer?

A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use. This kind of
cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife. What
sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
(which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
possibly other trolls, and not before time).

At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
eternity, in fact). But the wonderful news is that there is /still
time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
another 10 years. Make the most of it while you can! Cut out the sin
while you are able to. Stop coming onto newsgroups just to insult
those who post there. Stop swearing, even under your breath. Stop
ripping your customers off with substandard jobs (was that you on
Rogue Traders the other week?) When you find yourself experiencing
disgusting, unnatural homosexual urges, then that in itself is not a
sin, as long as you don't act on them (you may not have known that).
And so on. Make a real effort for the rest of your life, err on the
side of caution, and don't be unpleasant towards Christians just
because they have sinned less than you, and you may just escape
damnation. And that, surely, will be worth it.

Next time I pray for Judith, I will also pray for you. You won't thank
me now but I guarantee that you will be grateful one day.

[Tony Dragon]

On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks wrote:
> On May 21, 8:04 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 21/05/2012 12:39, Justin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>>>> ...
>>
>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. Perhaps it
>>>> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>>>> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>>
>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>> I thought you had buggered off?
>>
>>
>>
>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>> Another god botherer?
>
> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use. This kind of
> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife. What
> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> possibly other trolls, and not before time).

Could you give us a report on these interviews please, you know the sort
of thing :-
Date & time they took place
Where they took place
Those present
What legal representation was there.
What was said
Conclusions reached.

>
> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> eternity, in fact). But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> another 10 years. Make the most of it while you can! Cut out the sin
> while you are able to. Stop coming onto newsgroups just to insult
> those who post there. Stop swearing, even under your breath. Stop
> ripping your customers off with substandard jobs (was that you on
> Rogue Traders the other week?) When you find yourself experiencing
> disgusting, unnatural homosexual urges, then that in itself is not a
> sin, as long as you don't act on them (you may not have known that).
> And so on. Make a real effort for the rest of your life, err on the
> side of caution, and don't be unpleasant towards Christians just
> because they have sinned less than you, and you may just escape
> damnation. And that, surely, will be worth it.
>
> Next time I pray for Judith, I will also pray for you. You won't thank
> me now but I guarantee that you will be grateful one day.

Can you tell us what the prayers will be, perhaps if you tell us the
time & date of theses prayers & also there words, we could all join
together at that hour & pray to the great lord cyclist in the sky.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 21 mei, 22:16, Tony Dragon > wrote:
> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 21, 8:04 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 21/05/2012 12:39, Justin wrote:
>
> >>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > * *wrote:
> >>>> > * *wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > * *wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M >
> >>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
> >>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> >>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps it
> >>>> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
> >>>> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it..
>
> >>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> >>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> >> I thought you had buggered off?
>
> >>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >> Another god botherer?
>
> > A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use. This kind of
> > cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> > realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> > denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife. What
> > sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> > the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> > interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> > (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> > possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> Could you give us a report on these interviews please, you know the sort
> of thing :-
> Date & time they took place
> Where they took place
> Those present
> What legal representation was there.
> What was said
> Conclusions reached.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> > eternity, in fact). But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> > time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> > have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> > another 10 years. Make the most of it while you can! Cut out the sin
> > while you are able to. Stop coming onto newsgroups just to insult
> > those who post there. Stop swearing, even under your breath. Stop
> > ripping your customers off with substandard jobs (was that you on
> > Rogue Traders the other week?) When you find yourself experiencing
> > disgusting, unnatural homosexual urges, then that in itself is not a
> > sin, as long as you don't act on them (you may not have known that).
> > And so on. Make a real effort for the rest of your life, err on the
> > side of caution, and don't be unpleasant towards Christians just
> > because they have sinned less than you, and you may just escape
> > damnation. And that, surely, will be worth it.
>
> > Next time I pray for Judith, I will also pray for you. You won't thank
> > me now but I guarantee that you will be grateful one day.
>
> Can you tell us what the prayers will be, perhaps if you tell us the
> time & date of theses prayers & also there words, we could all join
> together at that hour & pray to the great lord cyclist in the sky.

"There words"?

[Judith[_4_]]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 03:30:58 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:
>
>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
>On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
>>Cyclists are road scum.
>
>This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.


Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
--
Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
FrontMech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie

Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 05:23:49 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 21 mei, 14:08, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
>> "Justin" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
>> >> "Justin" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> >> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>> >> >> basis.
>> >> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>> >> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>> >> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>> >> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>> >> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>> >> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps
>> >> it
>> >> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>> >> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>>
>> > Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>> > scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>> > I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal cyclists
>> and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not scum.
>Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act. I will pray for his
>(Dave's) forgiveness and enlightenment.
>> Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are scum.
>It is a pity you need need to resort to libel.
>Which laws can you prove I have broken? Does the law breaking have to
>restrict itself to issues relating to road use? Or is any instance of
>law breaking sufficient? How regular and hoe frequent does the law
>breaking have to be?
>You state that I am "militant". What proof do you have of that? Again,
>is this cycling militancy or general militancy?
>
>You say I hate all other road users. Show us some proof of that.
>I have two cars, one of which I particularly fond (a classic car).
>This is sometimes driven by other family members whilst I am on my
>bike. Are you actually saying that I hate both my own classic car and
>the family member behind its steering wheel whilst I am cycling?
>When I finish cycling and go for a drive in one of my cars, would you
>still refer to me as a law-breaking militant cyclist who hates all
>oher road users?
>When I am in the team car in a cycling race (for the junior club
>members) am I a law-breaking militant cyclist?
>> You're one of them.
>Your argument is completely flawed and libelous.


Oh - I had not realised that your other family members lived in Holland with
you.

I hate liars.













































































































































































































































Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
--
Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
FrontMech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie

Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

[Tony Dragon]

On 21/05/2012 21:37, Justin wrote:
> On 21 mei, 22:16, Tony > wrote:
>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 21, 8:04 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/2012 12:39, Justin wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>> ...
>>
>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. Perhaps it
>>>>>> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>>>>>> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>>
>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>>>> I thought you had buggered off?
>>
>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use. This kind of
>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife. What
>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>> Could you give us a report on these interviews please, you know the sort
>> of thing :-
>> Date& time they took place
>> Where they took place
>> Those present
>> What legal representation was there.
>> What was said
>> Conclusions reached.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>>> eternity, in fact). But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>> another 10 years. Make the most of it while you can! Cut out the sin
>>> while you are able to. Stop coming onto newsgroups just to insult
>>> those who post there. Stop swearing, even under your breath. Stop
>>> ripping your customers off with substandard jobs (was that you on
>>> Rogue Traders the other week?) When you find yourself experiencing
>>> disgusting, unnatural homosexual urges, then that in itself is not a
>>> sin, as long as you don't act on them (you may not have known that).
>>> And so on. Make a real effort for the rest of your life, err on the
>>> side of caution, and don't be unpleasant towards Christians just
>>> because they have sinned less than you, and you may just escape
>>> damnation. And that, surely, will be worth it.
>>
>>> Next time I pray for Judith, I will also pray for you. You won't thank
>>> me now but I guarantee that you will be grateful one day.
>>
>> Can you tell us what the prayers will be, perhaps if you tell us the
>> time& date of theses prayers& also there words, we could all join
>> together at that hour& pray to the great lord cyclist in the sky.
>
> "There words"?

Bugger.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 21 mei, 23:55, Judith > wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 05:23:49 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 21 mei, 14:08, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> >> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> >> > On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> >> >> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> >> ...
>
> >> >> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >> >> >> basis.
> >> >> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
> >> >> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >> >> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >> >> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >> >> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >> >> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps
> >> >> it
> >> >> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
> >> >> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:

> a ****wit.

If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:

> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
...
>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
>>> "Justin" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
...
>>>
>>> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>> >> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>> >> basis.
>>> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>> > following,
>>> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>>
>>> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>>>
>>> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>>
>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>> looking for it.
>>
>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
> scum. You're one of them.

I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[[email protected]]

On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>
> > "Justin" > wrote in message
> >
> ...
> >> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> >>> "Justin" > wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
> ...
> >>>
> >>> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> >>> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >>> >> basis.
> >>> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
> >>> > following,
> >>> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
> >>>
> >>> >>Cyclists are road scum.
> >>>
> >>> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >>> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
> >>>
> >>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
> >>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
> >>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
> >>> looking for it.
> >>
> >> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> >> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
> >>
> >> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
> >
> > I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> > cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> > scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
> > scum. You're one of them.
>
> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>
From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".

[Justin[_3_]]

On 22 mei, 14:02, wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller *wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>
> > > "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ....
> > >> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> > >>> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> > >>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
> > ...
>
> > >>> > On 21 mei, 11:59, Judith > wrote:
> > >>> >> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >> wrote:
>
> > >>> >> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> > >>> >> basis.
> > >>> > On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
> > >>> > following,
> > >>> > a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> > >>> >>Cyclists are road scum.
>
> > >>> > This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> > >>> > cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> > >>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
> > >>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
> > >>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
> > >>> looking for it.
>
> > >> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> > >> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> > >> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> > > I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> > > cyclists and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> > > scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
> > > scum. You're one of them.
>
> > I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. *He
> > has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
> > So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
> > rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>
> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:

>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>> Another god botherer?
>
> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.

Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
friend?

> This kind of
> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.

I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.

> What
> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> possibly other trolls, and not before time).

ROFLMFAO!!!!

>
> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> eternity, in fact).

Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?

> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> another 10 years.

My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.

> Make the most of it while you can! Cut out the sin
> while you are able to. Stop coming onto newsgroups just to insult
> those who post there. Stop swearing, even under your breath.

Swearing is simply making the best use of the English language. I mean
"Oh what a silly fellow" isn't anything like as good as "what a ****" is it?


> Stop
> ripping your customers off with substandard jobs (was that you on
> Rogue Traders the other week?)

Please try to be a little more original halfwit. The village idiots
Mason & Cwispin try this one on every now & them when they get desperate.


> When you find yourself experiencing
> disgusting, unnatural homosexual urges, then that in itself is not a
> sin, as long as you don't act on them (you may not have known that).

Homophobic remarks like that can get you into a lot of trouble halfwit.


> And so on. Make a real effort for the rest of your life, err on the
> side of caution, and don't be unpleasant towards Christians just
> because they have sinned less than you, and you may just escape
> damnation. And that, surely, will be worth it.

I'll make an effort to be even more unpleasant to bible bashers in
future just for you.
>
> Next time I pray for Judith, I will also pray for you. You won't thank
> me now but I guarantee that you will be grateful one day.

Don't waste your breath telling your imaginary friend about me.
--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>
>>> > wrote in message
>>>
>> ...
>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>> following,
>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>> looking for it.
>>>>
>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>>>
>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>
>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>
>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>
> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".


Oh look - a stalker.


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Bertie Wooster[_2_]]

On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
> wrote:

>On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>>
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>>> following,
>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>>> looking for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>>
>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>>
>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>>
>> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>
>
>Oh look - a stalker.

Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?

[Justin[_3_]]

On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie Wooster > wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller *wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>
> >>>> > *wrote in message
>
> ....
> >>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > *wrote:
> >>>>>> > *wrote in message
>
> >>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
> >>> ...
>
> >>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >>>>>>>> basis.
> >>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
> >>>>>>> following,
> >>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
> >>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
> >>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
> >>>>>> looking for it.
>
> >>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> >>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> >>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> >>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> >>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
> >>>> scum. You're one of them.
>
> >>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. *He
> >>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
> >>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
> >>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>
> >> *From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>
> >Oh look - a stalker.
>
> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?

Dave cannot define things. Nor, for that matter, can that Mr Benn
bloke: still waiting for him to back up his libellous statements about
my criminality.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 22/05/2012 18:44, Justin wrote:
> On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie > wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>
>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>>>>> ...
>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>>>>> following,
>>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>>>>> looking for it.
>>
>>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>
>>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>
>>>> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>>
>>> Oh look - a stalker.
>>
>> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>
> Dave cannot define things.

I can define a ****wit. Justin.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 22/05/2012 18:20, Bertie Wooster wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
> > wrote:
>
>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>>>> following,
>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>>>> looking for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>>>
>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>>>
>>> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>>
>>
>> Oh look - a stalker.
>
> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?

I don't recall making that remark. I may have been misquoted.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Justin Lewis[_4_]]

On May 22, 10:01*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 22/05/2012 18:44, Justin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie > *wrote:
> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >> > *wrote:
> >>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller *wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>
> >>>>>> > * *wrote in message
>
> ...
> >>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> > * *wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
> >>>>> ...
>
> >>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >>>>>>>>>> basis.
> >>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
> >>>>>>>>> following,
> >>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
> >>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
> >>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
> >>>>>>>> looking for it.
>
> >>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> >>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> >>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> >>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> >>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
> >>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>
> >>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. *He
> >>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
> >>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
> >>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>
> >>>> * From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly"..
>
> >>> Oh look - a stalker.
>
> >> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>
> > Dave cannot define things.
>
> I can define a ****wit. *Justin.
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University

Can you? Go on then.
--
http://www.wolfert.nl
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u
niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is
toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht
te verwijderen. De Wolfert van Borselen scholengroep aanvaardt geen
aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met
risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This
message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The Wolfert van
Borselen accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the
risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

[Justin Lewis[_4_]]

On May 22, 10:01*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 22/05/2012 18:44, Justin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie > *wrote:
> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >> > *wrote:
> >>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller *wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>
> >>>>>> > * *wrote in message
>
> ...
> >>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> > * *wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
> >>>>> ...
>
> >>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >>>>>>>>>> basis.
> >>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
> >>>>>>>>> following,
> >>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
> >>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
> >>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
> >>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
> >>>>>>>> looking for it.
>
> >>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> >>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> >>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> >>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> >>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
> >>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>
> >>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. *He
> >>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
> >>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
> >>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>
> >>>> * From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly"..
>
> >>> Oh look - a stalker.
>
> >> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>
> > Dave cannot define things.
>
> I can define a ****wit. *Justin.
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University

You defined scum - Judith and Mr Benn fit your definition. Well done.
--
http://www.wolfert.nl
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u
niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is
toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht
te verwijderen. De Wolfert van Borselen scholengroep aanvaardt geen
aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met
risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This
message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The Wolfert van
Borselen accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the
risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 22/05/2012 21:33, Justin Lewis wrote:
> On May 22, 10:01 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 22/05/2012 18:44, Justin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie > wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>>>>>>> ...
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>>>>>>> following,
>>>>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>>>>>>> looking for it.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>>>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>>>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>>>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>
>>>>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>>>>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>>>>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>>>>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>
>>>>>> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>>
>>>>> Oh look - a stalker.
>>
>>>> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>>
>>> Dave cannot define things.
>>
>> I can define a ****wit. Justin.
>>
>> --
>> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
>> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
>> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
>> University
>
> Can you? Go on then.

I just did. Not very bright are you ****wit?

And I thought you had buggered off?


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Bertie Wooster[_2_]]

On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:02:25 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
> wrote:

>On 22/05/2012 18:20, Bertie Wooster wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>>>>> following,
>>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>>>>> looking for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>>>>
>>>> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh look - a stalker.
>>
>> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>
>I don't recall making that remark. I may have been misquoted.

Do you understand the difference between a question and a statement?

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 22/05/2012 22:04, Bertie Wooster wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:02:25 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
> > wrote:
>
>> On 22/05/2012 18:20, Bertie Wooster wrote:
>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>>>>>>>>>>> basis.
>>>>>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>>>>>>>>>> following,
>>>>>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>>>>>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to
>>>>>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out
>>>>>>>>> looking for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>>>>>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>>>>>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>>>>>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users are
>>>>>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear. He
>>>>>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>>>>>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys road
>>>>>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh look - a stalker.
>>>
>>> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>>
>> I don't recall making that remark. I may have been misquoted.
>
> Do you understand the difference between a question and a statement?

Do you understand the difference between a brieze (sic) block & a
concrete block?


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[NM]

On May 22, 10:43*pm, Phil W Lee > wrote:
> Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> a ****wit.
>
> >If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!

Agreed, that Justin is plain weird.

[Squashme]

On May 22, 5:33*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >> Another god botherer?
>
> > A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> Accurate though. *How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
> friend?
>
> > This kind of
> > cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> > realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> > denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. *Now, about this
> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>
> > What
> > sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> > the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> > interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> > (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> > possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
>
>
> > At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> > eternity, in fact).
>
> Oh will I? *Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> > But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> > time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> > have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> > another 10 years.
>
> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>

"The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
>> friend?
>>
>>> This kind of
>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>>
>>> What
>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>> another 10 years.
>>
>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>
> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"

Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
biffday pressie?

Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?





--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Justin[_3_]]

On 23 mei, 01:15, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>> Another god botherer?
>
> >>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> >> Accurate though. *How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
> >> friend?
>
> >>> This kind of
> >>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> >>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> >>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> >> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. *Now, about this
> >> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>
> >>> What
> >>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> >>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> >>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> >>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> >>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> >> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
> >>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> >>> eternity, in fact).
>
> >> Oh will I? *Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> >>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> >>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> >>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> >>> another 10 years.
>
> >> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>
> > "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>
> Why is everyone interested in my age? *Do you all want to send me a
> biffday pressie?
>
> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University

Nice thread: I am accused of being a militant law breaker who hates
all other road users.

The only militancy here is from Dave, Benn and Judith who refer to a
particular group of roadusers as scum, ****s and ****wits.
Nice is that that they cannot define the group nor find any way of
proving that I am a member of it.

[Squashme]

On May 23, 12:15*am, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>> Another god botherer?
>
> >>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> >> Accurate though. *How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
> >> friend?
>
> >>> This kind of
> >>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> >>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> >>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> >> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. *Now, about this
> >> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>
> >>> What
> >>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> >>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> >>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> >>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> >>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> >> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
> >>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> >>> eternity, in fact).
>
> >> Oh will I? *Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> >>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> >>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> >>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> >>> another 10 years.
>
> >> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>
> > "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>
> Why is everyone interested in my age? *Do you all want to send me a
> biffday pressie?

No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm

>
> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>

Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?

[Mr Benn[_5_]]

"Justin" > wrote in message
...
> On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie Wooster > wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>>
>> >>>> > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>> >>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > wrote:
>> >>>>>> > wrote in message
>>
>> >>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
>> >>> ...
>>
>> >>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
>> >>>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
>> >>>>>>>> basis.
>> >>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
>> >>>>>>> following,
>> >>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>> >>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>> >>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right
>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>> >>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
>> >>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go
>> >>>>>> out
>> >>>>>> looking for it.
>>
>> >>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>> >>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>> >>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>> >>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
>> >>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
>> >>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users
>> >>>> are
>> >>>> scum. You're one of them.
>>
>> >>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear.
>> >>> He
>> >>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
>> >>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys
>> >>> road
>> >>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>>
>> >> From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly".
>>
>> >Oh look - a stalker.
>>
>> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>
> Dave cannot define things. Nor, for that matter, can that Mr Benn
> bloke: still waiting for him to back up his libellous statements about
> my criminality.

For one, you have admitted to red light jumping and don't you also advocate
using violence against motorists?

[Justin[_3_]]

On 23 mei, 10:36, "Mr Benn" > wrote:
> "Justin" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 22 mei, 19:20, Bertie Wooster > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 17:35:47 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >On 22/05/2012 13:02, wrote:
> >> >> On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:15:21 UTC+1, Peter Keller *wrote:
> >> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Mr Benn wrote:
>
> >> >>>> > *wrote in message
>
> >> ...
> >> >>>>> On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > *wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > *wrote in message
>
> >> >>>>>> news:9dfed0a0-2975-4127-a9a2-
> >> >>> ...
>
> >> >>>>>>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > *wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent
> >> >>>>>>>> basis.
> >> >>>>>>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the
> >> >>>>>>> following,
> >> >>>>>>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>
> >> >>>>>>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>
> >> >>>>>>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right
> >> >>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>
> >> >>>>>> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling.
> >> >>>>>> Perhaps it is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able
> >> >>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>> cycle without confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go
> >> >>>>>> out
> >> >>>>>> looking for it.
>
> >> >>>>> Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
> >> >>>>> scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>
> >> >>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >> >>>> I have told Dave in the past to make the distinction between normal
> >> >>>> cyclists and militant cyclists. *Normal law-abiding cyclists are not
> >> >>>> scum. Law-breaking militant cyclists who hate all other road users
> >> >>>> are
> >> >>>> scum. You're one of them.
>
> >> >>> I think Dave would like to see all bicyclists magically disappear.
> >> >>> He
> >> >>> has admitted to flying into an incandescent rage at the sight of one.
> >> >>> So he does not make any allowance as to whether the bicyclist obeys
> >> >>> road
> >> >>> rules, is courteous, has lights, gives way to pedestrians etc.
>
> >> >> *From Dave's website: "We are reliable, honest, polite, friendly"..
>
> >> >Oh look - a stalker.
>
> >> Do you define stalkers by someone who looks at your website?
>
> > Dave cannot define things. Nor, for that matter, can that Mr Benn
> > bloke: still waiting for him to back up his libellous statements about
> > my criminality.
>
> For one, you have admitted to red light jumping and don't you also advocate
> using violence against motorists?

Well, Mr Scum (only adhering to Dave's definition) you must repodt me
to the police. Even an idiot cannot think that the garbage posted in
this group in any way approaches the truth.
Whilst you are posting your unadulterated rubbish explain the
following. You described me as hating all other road users. I live in
Holland. 90% of my training is on single use paths. Show us how I hate
all other roadusers. I must have missed my own posting on that one.
You are very militant, with your repeatef declaration of hate for a
particular category of road user

[Judith[_4_]]

On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:42:40 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:

<snip>


>>Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
>
>Has the Advertising Standards Authority been told?


Ah - yes we had forgotten that you were an expert on such things M'Lud:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.

If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
pass dangerously close.

Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
heading of "causing an obstruction",
and should be investigated by the police as such.

If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
permission to proceed.
If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".

The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
try to treat the procession as unlawful. In this they are now equally
clearly in contempt of court.

It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
for any collision (including with the D lock).

If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
driving safely or legally.

I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
into permanent inability to drive

I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
decades.

























































































































































































--
X-no-archive : No
If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
again.
Message-ID: >
Phil W Lee 3 February 2011

[Judith[_4_]]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:27:12 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:

>On May 21, 8:04*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
>wrote:
>> On 21/05/2012 12:39, Justin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 21 mei, 12:46, "Mr > *wrote:
>> >> > *wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> >>> On 21 mei, 11:59, > *wrote:
>> >>>> On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT), M >
>> >>>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>> Both Mr Benn and I are real cyclists - ie we cycle on a frequent basis.
>> >>> On 18 February Dave the Handyman (61 years old) posted the following,
>> >>> a most unchristian sentiment (on uk.legal):
>>
>> >>>> Cyclists are road scum.
>>
>> >>> This vitriol is uncalled for: it is Judith's and Mr Benn's right to
>> >>> cycle without being subjected to this sort of abuse.
>>
>> >> I have never been subjected to any kind of abuse when cycling. *Perhaps it
>> >> is my non-aggressive manner which leads me to be able to cycle without
>> >> confrontation unlike the militant cyclists who go out looking for it.
>>
>> > Which, of course, is what makes Dave's having called Mr Benn "road
>> > scum" such an uncharitable and inappropriate act.
>>
>> I thought you had buggered off?
>>
>>
>>
>> > I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>> Another god botherer?
>
>A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use. This kind of
>cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife. What
>sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>(which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>possibly other trolls, and not before time).

And your evidence of this is what?

The Hull police (team of three) are still investigating.

Porky Chapman had to pull the plug on Nuxx Bar police and court etc because
there was a lack of evidence and the Porker realised that he would be
cross-examined in court.

This would include explaining why he had registered the name Lou Knee - purely
to harass Nuxx Bar. He then provided the details of the email address and
password to others including Crispin so that they could heap their own abuse
on NB.


I am pleased to say that the whole issue went right up Porker's arse.




>At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>eternity, in fact). But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>another 10 years. Make the most of it while you can! Cut out the sin
>while you are able to. Stop coming onto newsgroups just to insult
>those who post there. Stop swearing, even under your breath. Stop
>ripping your customers off with substandard jobs (was that you on
>Rogue Traders the other week?) When you find yourself experiencing
>disgusting, unnatural homosexual urges, then that in itself is not a
>sin, as long as you don't act on them (you may not have known that).
>And so on. Make a real effort for the rest of your life, err on the
>side of caution, and don't be unpleasant towards Christians just
>because they have sinned less than you, and you may just escape
>damnation. And that, surely, will be worth it.
>
>Next time I pray for Judith, I will also pray for you. You won't thank
>me now but I guarantee that you will be grateful one day.


You are so full of **** - I just knew that you would be good value.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:

>Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
>>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>>> a ****wit.
>>
>>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
>Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!

Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.

================================================== =============
If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.

If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
pass dangerously close.

Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
heading of "causing an obstruction",
and should be investigated by the police as such.

If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
permission to proceed.
If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".

The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
try to treat the procession as unlawful. In this they are now equally
clearly in contempt of court.

It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
for any collision (including with the D lock).

If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
driving safely or legally.

I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
into permanent inability to drive

I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
decades.

If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
again.

================================================== ========

[Justin[_3_]]

On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> ================================================== =============
> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> pass dangerously close.
>
> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> permission to proceed.
> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> driving safely or legally.
>
> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> into permanent inability to drive
>
> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> decades.
>
> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> again.
>
> ================================================== ========

Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
the plot.

[M Wicks]

On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
> If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> again.

What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?

[Justin[_3_]]

On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
>
>
> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> > again.
>
> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?

Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
claims to work in education.

[Mrcheerful[_3_]]

M Wicks wrote:
> On May 23, 11:33 am, Judith > wrote:
>>
>> If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
>> again.
>
> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?

She is merely repeating quotes from a psycholist's post. Why should that
make her ashamed?

[Mr. Benn[_9_]]

"Justin Lewis" wrote in message
...

You defined scum - Judith and Mr Benn fit your definition. Well done.
--
http://www.wolfert.nl
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u
niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is
toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht
te verwijderen. De Wolfert van Borselen scholengroep aanvaardt geen
aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met
risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This
message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The Wolfert van
Borselen accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the
risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
================================================== =====

If you are going to call me scum, don't do it from your employer's network.

[Mr. Benn[_9_]]

Justin" wrote in message
...

> > Dave cannot define things. Nor, for that matter, can that Mr Benn
> > bloke: still waiting for him to back up his libellous statements about
> > my criminality.
>
> For one, you have admitted to red light jumping and don't you also
> advocate
> using violence against motorists?

Well, Mr Scum (only adhering to Dave's definition) you must repodt me
to the police. Even an idiot cannot think that the garbage posted in
this group in any way approaches the truth.
==========================================

Are you saying that I shouldn't believe what you say?

[jnugent]

On 23/05/2012 12:46, M Wicks wrote:

> On May 23, 11:33 am, > wrote:

>> If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
>> again.

> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?

In *case* you don't know already, that was a verbatim copy of something
posted by legal expert Mr Lee. Every letter, comma, jot and tittle.

The PP invented none of it.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 24 mei, 09:55, "Mr. Benn" > wrote:
> Justin" *wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > > Dave cannot define things. Nor, for that matter, can that Mr Benn
> > > bloke: still waiting for him to back up his libellous statements about
> > > my criminality.
>
> > For one, you have admitted to red light jumping and don't you also
> > advocate
> > using violence against motorists?
>
> Well, Mr Scum (only adhering to Dave's definition) you must repodt me
> to the police. Even an idiot cannot think that the garbage posted in
> this group in any way approaches the truth.
> ==========================================
>
> Are you saying that I shouldn't believe what you say?
I am saying you have failed to define law breaker, that you have no
evidence of my law breaking, that approving of an action is not the
same as carrying it out (not illegal), that you have failed to show my
alleged militancy and that you cannot support your allegation that I
'hate all other road users'.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:59:12 +0100, Judith wrote:

> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> decades.

You are a miserable piece of ****. Wishing harm on others.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:25:07 +0100, Judith wrote:

> Porky Chapman

Stalkers can more comprehensively use the Internet in order to slander
and endanger their victims.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700, Justin wrote:

> On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to
>> >>learn and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's
>> name stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> ================================================== =============
>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones,
>> you must have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention
>> was to pass dangerously close.
>>
>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under
>> the heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police
>> for permission to proceed.
>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful
>> detention".
>>
>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. Â*In this they are now equally
>> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are
>> within range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held
>> liable for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> decades.
>>
>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. Â*He'll never drive a taxi
>> again.
>>
>> ================================================== ========
>
> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> the plot.

You mean her?

http://www.rollonfriday.com/Portals/0/images/steptoe.jpg



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 24/05/2012 09:03, Justin wrote:
> On 24 mei, 09:55, "Mr. > wrote:
>> Justin" wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> Dave cannot define things. Nor, for that matter, can that Mr Benn
>>>> bloke: still waiting for him to back up his libellous statements about
>>>> my criminality.
>>
>>> For one, you have admitted to red light jumping and don't you also
>>> advocate
>>> using violence against motorists?
>>
>> Well, Mr Scum (only adhering to Dave's definition) you must repodt me
>> to the police. Even an idiot cannot think that the garbage posted in
>> this group in any way approaches the truth.
>> ==========================================
>>
>> Are you saying that I shouldn't believe what you say?
> I am saying you have failed to define law breaker, that you have no
> evidence of my law breaking, that approving of an action is not the
> same as carrying it out (not illegal), that you have failed to show my
> alleged militancy and that you cannot support your allegation that I
> 'hate all other road users'.

He still hasn't worked it out has he?


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 23/05/2012 05:38, Justin wrote:
> On 23 mei, 01:15, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
>>>> friend?
>>
>>>>> This kind of
>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>>
>>>>> What
>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>> another 10 years.
>>
>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>
>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>> biffday pressie?
>>
>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>
>> --
>> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
>> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
>> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
>> University
>
> Nice thread: I am accused of being a militant law breaker who hates
> all other road users.
>
> The only militancy here is from Dave, Benn and Judith who refer to a
> particular group of roadusers as scum, ****s and ****wits.
> Nice is that that they cannot define the group nor find any way of
> proving that I am a member of it.

You are without doubt a fully qualified ****wit.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
>>>> friend?
>>
>>>>> This kind of
>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>>
>>>>> What
>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>> another 10 years.
>>
>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>
>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>> biffday pressie?
>
> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
> http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>
>>
>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>
>
> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>
Is not the correct answer.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Squashme]

On May 24, 10:15*am, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>>>> Another god botherer?
>
> >>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> >>>> Accurate though. *How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
> >>>> friend?
>
> >>>>> This kind of
> >>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> >>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> >>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> >>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. *Now, about this
> >>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory..
>
> >>>>> What
> >>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> >>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> >>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> >>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> >>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> >>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
> >>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> >>>>> eternity, in fact).
>
> >>>> Oh will I? *Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> >>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> >>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> >>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> >>>>> another 10 years.
>
> >>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>
> >>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>
> >> Why is everyone interested in my age? *Do you all want to send me a
> >> biffday pressie?
>
> > No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
> >http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>
> >> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>
> > Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>
> Is not the correct answer.
>

Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
chargeable?
Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?

http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/

[jnugent]

On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
>>>>>> friend?
>>
>>>>>>> This kind of
>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>>
>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>>
>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>
>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>>>> biffday pressie?
>>
>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
>>> http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>>
>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>
>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>>
>> Is not the correct answer.
>>
>
> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
> chargeable?
> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>
> http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/

"Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?

Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.

[Squashme]

On May 24, 11:39*am, JNugent > wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>
> >>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> >>>>>> Accurate though. *How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
> >>>>>> friend?
>
> >>>>>>> This kind of
> >>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> >>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
> >>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> >>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. *Now, about this
> >>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>
> >>>>>>> What
> >>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
> >>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> >>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> >>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> >>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> >>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
> >>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
> >>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>
> >>>>>> Oh will I? *Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> >>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> >>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> >>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> >>>>>>> another 10 years.
>
> >>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>
> >>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>
> >>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? *Do you all want to send me a
> >>>> biffday pressie?
>
> >>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
> >>>http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>
> >>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>
> >>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>
> >> Is not the correct answer.
>
> > Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
> > chargeable?
> > Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
> > gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>
> >http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>
> "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>
> Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.


Gosh, I didn't think that God used patents.

--------------------------------
"Mole attack" on the Vic-20:-
http://s.uvlist.net/l/y2005/7/3198.jpg

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 24/05/2012 11:39, JNugent wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
>> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>> wrote:
>>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>>
>>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>>
>>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an
>>>>>>> imaginary
>>>>>>> friend?
>>>
>>>>>>>> This kind of
>>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and
>>>>>>>> are in
>>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>>
>>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot
>>>>>>> theory.
>>>
>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of
>>>>>>>> time, in
>>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>>
>>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>>
>>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at
>>>>>>>> leisure (for
>>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>>
>>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>>
>>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>>>
>>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>>
>>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>>
>>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>>>>> biffday pressie?
>>>
>>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
>>>> http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>>>
>>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>>
>>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>>>
>>> Is not the correct answer.
>>>
>>
>> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
>> chargeable?
>> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
>> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>>
>> http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>
> "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>
> Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.

Indeed - because they were invented by Norman Mole & Co Ltd in Wales.


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[jnugent]

On 24/05/2012 13:13, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 11:39, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
>>> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an
>>>>>>>> imaginary
>>>>>>>> friend?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This kind of
>>>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and
>>>>>>>>> are in
>>>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot
>>>>>>>> theory.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of
>>>>>>>>> time, in
>>>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>>>
>>>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at
>>>>>>>>> leisure (for
>>>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>>>
>>>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>>>
>>>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>>>>>> biffday pressie?
>>>>
>>>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
>>>>> http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>>>
>>>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>>>>
>>>> Is not the correct answer.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
>>> chargeable?
>>> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
>>> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>>>
>>> http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>>
>> "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>>
>> Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.
>
> Indeed - because they were invented by Norman Mole & Co Ltd in Wales.

I distinctly recall the name on tools in use when I was an apprentice.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:30:44 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller >
wrote:

>On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:59:12 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> decades.
>
>You are a miserable piece of ****. Wishing harm on others.



You are a pathetic fool.

I was clearly quoting what Anchor Lee had said - not my thoughts or comments at
all.

An apology will be accepted.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Tue, 22 May 2012 21:38:22 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 23 mei, 01:15, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
>wrote:
>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>> >>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>> >>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>> >>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>> >> Accurate though. *How else would you describe someone with an imaginary
>> >> friend?
>>
>> >>> This kind of
>> >>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>> >>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and are in
>> >>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>> >> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. *Now, about this
>> >> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot theory.
>>
>> >>> What
>> >>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of time, in
>> >>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>> >>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>> >>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>> >>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>> >> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>> >>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at leisure (for
>> >>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>> >> Oh will I? *Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>> >>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>> >>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>> >>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>> >>> another 10 years.
>>
>> >> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>> > "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>
>> Why is everyone interested in my age? *Do you all want to send me a
>> biffday pressie?
>>
>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>
>> --
>> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
>> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
>> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
>> University
>
>Nice thread: I am accused of being a militant law breaker who hates
>all other road users.
>
>The only militancy here is from Dave, Benn and Judith who refer to a
>particular group of roadusers as scum, ****s and ****wits.
>Nice is that that they cannot define the group nor find any way of
>proving that I am a member of it.



Oh - it is quite easy. You behaviour in the is group defiantly shows that you
are a ****wit; your total cock-up over IP addresses and posting names
definitely shows that you are as thick as pig-****.

HTH.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>>
>> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> ================================================== =============
>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>> pass dangerously close.
>>
>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>> permission to proceed.
>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
>> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> decades.
>>
>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> again.
>>
>> ================================================== ========
>
>Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>the plot.


Oh dear, oh dear.

has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?

You really are thick you know.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:46:35 -0700 (PDT), M Wicks > wrote:

>On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>>
>> If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> again.
>
>What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
>either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?


Look **** for brains:

I was quoting what the ****wit ****** Lee had previously said.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
>> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> > again.
>>
>> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
>> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>
>Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
>not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
>claims to work in education.


OH dear -another ****wit.

[Squashme]

On May 24, 1:13*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 11:39, JNugent wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
> >> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>
> >>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> >>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an
> >>>>>>> imaginary
> >>>>>>> friend?
>
> >>>>>>>> This kind of
> >>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> >>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and
> >>>>>>>> are in
> >>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> >>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
> >>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot
> >>>>>>> theory.
>
> >>>>>>>> What
> >>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of
> >>>>>>>> time, in
> >>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> >>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> >>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> >>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> >>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
> >>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at
> >>>>>>>> leisure (for
> >>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>
> >>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> >>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> >>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> >>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> >>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>
> >>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>
> >>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>
> >>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
> >>>>> biffday pressie?
>
> >>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
> >>>>http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>
> >>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>
> >>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>
> >>> Is not the correct answer.
>
> >> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
> >> chargeable?
> >> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
> >> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>
> >>http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>
> > "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>
> > Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.
>
> Indeed - because they were invented by Norman Mole & Co Ltd in Wales.
>

OK, so who invented monkey wrenches? And where?

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 24/05/2012 16:06, Squashme wrote:
> On May 24, 1:13 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 24/05/2012 11:39, JNugent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
>>>> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an
>>>>>>>>> imaginary
>>>>>>>>> friend?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> This kind of
>>>>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and
>>>>>>>>>> are in
>>>>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>>>>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot
>>>>>>>>> theory.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of
>>>>>>>>>> time, in
>>>>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>>>>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>>>>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at
>>>>>>>>>> leisure (for
>>>>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>>
>>>>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>>>>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>
>>>>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>>>>>>> biffday pressie?
>>
>>>>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
>>>>>> http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>>
>>>>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>
>>>>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>>
>>>>> Is not the correct answer.
>>
>>>> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
>>>> chargeable?
>>>> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
>>>> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>>
>>>> http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>>
>>> "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>>
>>> Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.
>>
>> Indeed - because they were invented by Norman Mole& Co Ltd in Wales.
>>
>
> OK, so who invented monkey wrenches? And where?
>
>
In 1840, Worcester, Massachusetts knife manufacturer Loring Coes
invented a screw-based coach wrench design in which the jaw width was
set with a spinning ring fixed under the sliding lower jaw, above the
handle.

This was patented in 1841 and the tools were advertised and sold in the
United States as monkey wrenches, a term which was already in use for
the English handle-set coach wrenches

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Squashme]

On May 24, 5:05*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 24/05/2012 16:06, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 24, 1:13 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 24/05/2012 11:39, JNugent wrote:
>
> >>> On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
> >>>> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened..
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an
> >>>>>>>>> imaginary
> >>>>>>>>> friend?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> This kind of
> >>>>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
> >>>>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and
> >>>>>>>>>> are in
> >>>>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>
> >>>>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
> >>>>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot
> >>>>>>>>> theory.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> What
> >>>>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of
> >>>>>>>>>> time, in
> >>>>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
> >>>>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
> >>>>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
> >>>>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>
> >>>>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>
> >>>>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at
> >>>>>>>>>> leisure (for
> >>>>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>
> >>>>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
> >>>>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
> >>>>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
> >>>>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>
> >>>>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>
> >>>>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>
> >>>>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
> >>>>>>> biffday pressie?
>
> >>>>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
> >>>>>>http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>
> >>>>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>
> >>>>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>
> >>>>> Is not the correct answer.
>
> >>>> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
> >>>> chargeable?
> >>>> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
> >>>> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>
> >>>>http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>
> >>> "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>
> >>> Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.
>
> >> Indeed - because they were invented by Norman Mole& *Co Ltd in Wales..
>
> > OK, so who invented monkey wrenches? And where?
>
> In 1840, Worcester, Massachusetts knife manufacturer Loring Coes
> invented a screw-based coach wrench design in which the jaw width was
> set with a spinning ring fixed under the sliding lower jaw, above the
> handle.
>
> This was patented in 1841 and the tools were advertised and sold in the
> United States as monkey wrenches, a term which was already in use for
> the English handle-set coach wrenches
>

Ta.

http://57thbombwing.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=9846

Had to. It's a sort of compulsion.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
> >> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> > again.
>
> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>
> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
> >not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
> >claims to work in education.
>
> OH dear -another ****wit.

May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
callous.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 24/05/2012 20:02, Squashme wrote:
> On May 24, 5:05 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 24/05/2012 16:06, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 24, 1:13 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 24/05/2012 11:39, JNugent wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 24/05/2012 11:07, Squashme wrote:
>>>>>> On May 24, 10:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/05/2012 08:45, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On May 23, 12:15 am, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 22/05/2012 23:36, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 5:33 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/05/2012 20:27, M Wicks rambled incoherently:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will pray for Dave being forgiven and becoming enlightened.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another god botherer?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A typically shallow and derogatory phrase for you to use.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Accurate though. How else would you describe someone with an
>>>>>>>>>>> imaginary
>>>>>>>>>>> friend?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>> cheap insult of Christians is usually used by those who, deep down,
>>>>>>>>>>>> realise that their lives so far have been chock-full of sin and
>>>>>>>>>>>> are in
>>>>>>>>>>>> denial about what that will mean for them in the Afterlife.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've enjoyed every 'sin' I've ever come across. Now, about this
>>>>>>>>>>> 'afterlife' bollox. Provide some evidence about this crackpot
>>>>>>>>>>> theory.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>>>>>> sounds clever now may not seem as clever in the fullness of
>>>>>>>>>>>> time, in
>>>>>>>>>>>> the same way that those who make 'smart' remarks during police
>>>>>>>>>>>> interviews usually regret it when those remarks are played in court
>>>>>>>>>>>> (which will apparently soon be happening to Judith, 'Nuxx Barr' and
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly other trolls, and not before time).
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!!!!
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> At this rate, that is an attitude that you will regret at
>>>>>>>>>>>> leisure (for
>>>>>>>>>>>> eternity, in fact).
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh will I? Did your imaginary friend tell you that?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But the wonderful news is that there is /still
>>>>>>>>>>>> time/, Dave! I agree with you that your life so far is unlikely to
>>>>>>>>>>>> have been a bed of roses, but at 61, you probably have at least
>>>>>>>>>>>> another 10 years.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My life has been ****ing wonderful you halfwit. And I'm not 61.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> "The secret diary of Dave Mole-Wrench, aged 60 11/12"
>>
>>>>>>>>> Why is everyone interested in my age? Do you all want to send me a
>>>>>>>>> biffday pressie?
>>
>>>>>>>> No point. You will have installed one of these already:-
>>>>>>>> http://www.c-p-p.co.uk/category/asp/CtgID/2136/af/page.htm
>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you know why they are called Mole Wrenches BTW?
>>
>>>>>>>> Because they weren't invented on the River Medway?
>>
>>>>>>> Is not the correct answer.
>>
>>>>>> Really? I was awaiting your professional help on this. Or is it
>>>>>> chargeable?
>>>>>> Is it because, originally, the handles were covered in the velvety
>>>>>> gentleman's skin, so as not to callus the humble tradesman's palm?
>>
>>>>>> http://www.ehow.com/mole-sauce/
>>
>>>>> "Mole" is a registered brand name, isn't it?
>>
>>>>> Like Hoover, Biro or Flymo.
>>
>>>> Indeed - because they were invented by Norman Mole& Co Ltd in Wales.
>>
>>> OK, so who invented monkey wrenches? And where?
>>
>> In 1840, Worcester, Massachusetts knife manufacturer Loring Coes
>> invented a screw-based coach wrench design in which the jaw width was
>> set with a spinning ring fixed under the sliding lower jaw, above the
>> handle.
>>
>> This was patented in 1841 and the tools were advertised and sold in the
>> United States as monkey wrenches, a term which was already in use for
>> the English handle-set coach wrenches
>>
>
> Ta.
>
> http://57thbombwing.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=9846
>
> Had to. It's a sort of compulsion.
>

Monkey 'wrench' not 'wench'. Pay attention.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 25/05/2012 13:13, Justin wrote:
> On 24 mei, 15:21, > wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 23 mei, 13:46, M > wrote:
>>>> On May 23, 11:33 am, > wrote:
>>
>>>>> If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
>>>>> again.
>>
>>>> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
>>>> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>>
>>> Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
>>> not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
>>> claims to work in education.
>>
>> OH dear -another ****wit.
>
> May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
> callous.


I trust you are going to say the same about Phil W Lee's comments?

Or do you have complete double standards like most cyclists?



--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Judith[_4_]]

On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
>> >> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>>
>> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> >> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> >> > again.
>>
>> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
>> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>>
>> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
>> >not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
>> >claims to work in education.
>>
>> OH dear -another ****wit.
>
>May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
>callous.
Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
--
Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
FrontMech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie

Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 25 mei, 19:47, Judith > wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
> >> >> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
> >> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> > again.
>
> >> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> >> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>
> >> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
> >> >not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
> >> >claims to work in education.
>
> >> OH dear -another ****wit.
>
> >May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
> >callous.
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
May the good Lord lead you to the truth, a journey upon which you are
yet to embark. Your use of insults is unholy and dark.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 25/05/2012 19:02, Justin wrote:
> On 25 mei, 19:47, > wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 24 mei, 15:21, > wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 23 mei, 13:46, M > wrote:
>>>>>> On May 23, 11:33 am, > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
>>>>>>> again.
>>
>>>>>> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
>>>>>> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>>
>>>>> Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
>>>>> not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
>>>>> claims to work in education.
>>
>>>> OH dear -another ****wit.
>>
>>> May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
>>> callous.
>>
>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> --
>> Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> FrontMech
>> Billsgate
>> Ricky Bikebloke
>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> J.M.Messie
>>
>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
> May the good Lord lead you to the truth, a journey upon which you are
> yet to embark. Your use of insults is unholy and dark.


Has Justipoos been born again?

Does that mean he's had to stop snogging blokes?



--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:18:54 +0100, Judith wrote:

> You really are thick


In its technical sense, anger refers to the desire to “get even with�—
that is, to take revenge on—the cause of the hurt.


--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:13:02 +0100, Judith wrote:

> pathetic fool.

Pathetic fool? Is that the best you can do you miserable wimp? what is
wrong with giving me the honour of worthless bag of filth you queasy,
convulsing nauseating mass of tripe?



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:01:35 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:

> Monkey 'wrench' not 'wench'.

I would much rather have a wench thanks.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:19 -0700, Justin wrote:

> On 25 mei, 19:47, Judith > wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Justin
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin
>> >> >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
>> >> >> On May 23, 11:33Â*am, Judith > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids
>> >> >> > on a trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. Â*He'll never
>> >> >> > drive a taxi again.
>>
>> >> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
>> >> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>>
>> >> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He
>> >> >dare not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his
>> >> >postings. He claims to work in education.
>>
>> >> OH dear -another ****wit.
>>
>> >May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
>> >callous.
>>
>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> --
>> Justin Â*(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> FrontMech Billsgate Ricky Bikebloke Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> J.M.Messie Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens He has
>> denied it. Â*Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
> May the good Lord lead you to the truth, a journey upon which you are
> yet to embark. Your use of insults is unholy and dark.


It has run out of ideas has it not? Merely repeating ad vomituum a non-
original "signature"


--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:20:01 +0100, Judith wrote:

> **** for brains:

The truth is, anger may be a “natural�—that is, a commonly occurring—
social reaction to hurt and insult, yet being natural doesn’t make it
good for us.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 08:28:00 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller >
wrote:

<snip>


>It has run out of ideas has it not? Merely repeating ad vomituum a non-
>original "signature"


--
You are Peter Keller MB ChB FANZCA - a silly old sod in his late sixties in New Zealand, and ICMFP
A credit to the Medical Profession - ffs

[Squashme]

On May 27, 9:24*am, Peter Keller > wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:01:35 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>
> > Monkey 'wrench' not 'wench'.
>
> I would much rather have a wench thanks.
>

Dave would prefer a "monkey."

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 27/05/2012 12:45, Squashme wrote:
> On May 27, 9:24 am, Peter > wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:01:35 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>
>>> Monkey 'wrench' not 'wench'.
>>
>> I would much rather have a wench thanks.
>>
>
> Dave would prefer a "monkey."

I already have you....

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Squashme]

On May 27, 9:28*am, Peter Keller > wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:19 -0700, Justin wrote:
> > On 25 mei, 19:47, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Justin
> >> >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin
> >> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
> >> >> >> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids
> >> >> >> > on a trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never
> >> >> >> > drive a taxi again.
>
> >> >> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> >> >> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>
> >> >> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He
> >> >> >dare not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his
> >> >> >postings. He claims to work in education.
>
> >> >> OH dear -another ****wit.
>
> >> >May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
> >> >callous.
>
> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> --
> >> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> FrontMech Billsgate Ricky Bikebloke Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> J.M.Messie Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens He has
> >> denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
> > May the good Lord lead you to the truth, a journey upon which you are
> > yet to embark. Your use of insults is unholy and dark.
>
> It has run out of ideas has it not? *Merely repeating ad vomituum a non-
> original "signature"
>

I wonder if it ever has a Mitchell and Webb moment, just wondering if
it might be a baddy.

[Squashme]

On May 27, 12:48*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 27/05/2012 12:45, Squashme wrote:
>
> > On May 27, 9:24 am, Peter > *wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:01:35 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>
> >>> Monkey 'wrench' not 'wench'.
>
> >> I would much rather have a wench thanks.
>
> > Dave would prefer a "monkey."
>
> I already have you....
>

I already have you.... what?

Don't be shy. Vent. Let it out. I'm difficult to shock.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 27/05/2012 13:03, Squashme wrote:
> On May 27, 12:48 pm, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 27/05/2012 12:45, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>> On May 27, 9:24 am, Peter > wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:01:35 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>
>>>>> Monkey 'wrench' not 'wench'.
>>
>>>> I would much rather have a wench thanks.
>>
>>> Dave would prefer a "monkey."
>>
>> I already have you....
>>
>
> I already have you.... what?

You ... as a virtual monkey. If I had an infinite number of Squashme's
they would eventually write something sensible.
>
> Don't be shy. Vent. Let it out. I'm difficult to shock.

Not with a 415v supply.


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:21:02 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

> Peter Keller > considered Sun, 27 May 2012 08:28:00
> +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
>>On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:19 -0700, Justin wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 mei, 19:47, Judith > wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Justin
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
>>>> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
>>>> >> >> On May 23, 11:33Â*am, Judith > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver
>>>> >> >> > risking people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take
>>>> >> >> > your kids on a trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling.
>>>> >> >> > Â*He'll never drive a taxi again.
>>>>
>>>> >> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are
>>>> >> >> also either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>>>>
>>>> >> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He
>>>> >> >dare not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his
>>>> >> >postings. He claims to work in education.
>>>>
>>>> >> OH dear -another ****wit.
>>>>
>>>> >May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
>>>> >callous.
>>>>
>>>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>>>> --
>>>> Justin Â*(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>>>> FrontMech Billsgate Ricky Bikebloke Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>>>> J.M.Messie Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens He has
>>>> denied it. Â*Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>> May the good Lord lead you to the truth, a journey upon which you are
>>> yet to embark. Your use of insults is unholy and dark.
>>
>>
>>It has run out of ideas has it not? Merely repeating ad vomituum a non-
>>original "signature"
>
> I've not seen any evidence for it ever having had any ideas in the first
> place, so I'm not sure "run out" is an accurate description.


How true and pathetic.


--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:21:21 +0100, Judith wrote:

> a silly old sod

Oh dear oh dear oh dear.
What is wrong with the honour of Babylonian scullion, Macedonian
wheelwright, brewer of Jerusalem, goat-****er of Alexandria, swineherd of
Greater and Lesser Egypt, Armenian pig?
I am disappointed and must work harder --



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 28/05/2012 09:29, Peter Keller wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:21:21 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
>> a silly old sod
>
> Oh dear oh dear oh dear.
> What is wrong with the honour of Babylonian scullion, Macedonian
> wheelwright, brewer of Jerusalem, goat-****er of Alexandria, swineherd of
> Greater and Lesser Egypt, Armenian pig?
> I am disappointed and must work harder --
>
>
>
Silly old sod just sums you up so perfectly.


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Justin[_3_]]

On 25 mei, 19:47, Judith > wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
> >> >> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
> >> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> > again.
>
> >> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> >> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>
> >> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
> >> >not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
> >> >claims to work in education.
>
> >> OH dear -another ****wit.
>
> >May the good Lord have mercy upon you fot being so vindictive and
> >callous.
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 24 mei, 15:21, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 05:04:27 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 23 mei, 13:46, M Wicks > wrote:
> >> On May 23, 11:33*am, Judith > wrote:
>
> >> > If the b**tards won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> > people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> > trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> > again.
>
> >> What an awful thing to say. The other things you posted are also
> >> either similarly awful or wrong. Have you no shame?
>
> >Judith has some shame: he hides behind a cloak of anonymity. He dare
> >not reveal who he is, given the ungodly nature of his postings. He
> >claims to work in education.
>
> OH dear -another ****wit.

I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> ================================================== =============
> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> permission to proceed.
> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> decades.
>
> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> again.
>
> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >the plot.
>
> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> You really are thick you know.

I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.

[Mr. Benn[_6_]]

"Justin" > wrote in message
...

I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
================================

Justin, you would benefit by reading this:

http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Anger-management/Pages/Introduction.aspx

This type of counselling is almost certainly also available in the
Netherlands. Good luck with it and let us know how you get on.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>>
>> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> >> ================================================== =============
>> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>> >> pass dangerously close.
>>
>> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>> >> permission to proceed.
>> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
>> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> >> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> >> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> >> decades.
>>
>> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> >> again.
>>
>> >> ================================================== ========
>>
>> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>> >the plot.
>>
>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>> You really are thick you know.
>
>I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.


I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?



Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
--
Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
FrontMech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie

Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:24 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:

> Silly old sod

How pathetically wimpy you ****. What about the greater honour of being
spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb and
evasive you contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist,
avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged twerp?



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >the plot.
>
> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
cartoon charavtrr

[Justin[_3_]]

On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >the plot.
>
> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
A cartoon insult from an anonymous spineless loser hiding behind an
invented character.
We have seen how much of a man you are, you daren't even stand up for
yourself.
The Collyhurst Foghorn Leghorn.

Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 29 mei, 01:36, Peter Keller > wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:24 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>
> > Silly old sod
>
> How pathetically wimpy you ****. *What about the greater honour of being
> spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb and
> evasive you contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist,
> avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged twerp?
>
> --
> Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

And those are his mitigating qualities. Homophobic, mysoginstic,
neanderthal, semi-evolved, simian, cheap, mendacious, cowardly,
illiterate, unlettered, reptillian, xenophobic and supturating leap
immediately to mind as additions which may help complete the less
unpleasant half of the picture.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> >> >> ================================================== =============
>> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>>
>> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>> >> >> permission to proceed.
>> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
>> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> >> >> decades.
>>
>> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> >> >> again.
>>
>> >> >> ================================================== ========
>>
>> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>> >> >the plot.
>>
>> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>> >> You really are thick you know.
>>
>> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>
>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>
>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> --
>> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> FrontMech
>> Billsgate
>> Ricky Bikebloke
>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> J.M.Messie
>>
>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
>I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
>cartoon charavtrr


Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?

Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
--
Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
FrontMech
Billsgate
Ricky Bikebloke
Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
J.M.Messie

Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Wed, 30 May 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> >> >> ================================================== =============
>> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>>
>> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>> >> >> permission to proceed.
>> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
>> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> >> >> decades.
>>
>> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
>> >> >> again.
>>
>> >> >> ================================================== ========
>>
>> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>> >> >the plot.
>>
>> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>> >> You really are thick you know.
>>
>> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>
>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>
>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> --
>> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> FrontMech
>> Billsgate
>> Ricky Bikebloke
>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> J.M.Messie
>>
>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
>I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>A cartoon insult from an anonymous spineless loser hiding behind an
>invented character.
>We have seen how much of a man you are, you daren't even stand up for
>yourself.
>The Collyhurst Foghorn Leghorn.
>
>Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.


Oh dear - it's the well known liar Justin-in-it-for-a-stuffin.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >> >the plot.
>
> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> --
> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> FrontMech
> >> Billsgate
> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> J.M.Messie
> >>
> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >cartoon charavtrr
>
> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

Little chicken **** bottler
I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 30 mei, 18:55, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >> >the plot.
>
> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> --
> >> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> FrontMech
> >> Billsgate
> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> J.M.Messie
> >>
> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >A cartoon insult from an anonymous spineless loser hiding behind an
> >invented character.
> >We have seen how much of a man you are, you daren't even stand up for
> >yourself.
> >The Collyhurst Foghorn Leghorn.
>
> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> Oh dear - it's the well known liar Justin-in-it-for-a-stuffin.

I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >> >the plot.
>
> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> --
> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> FrontMech
> >> Billsgate
> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> J.M.Messie
> >>
> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >cartoon charavtrr
>
> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>You are a very thick spineless bottler. Which word is in Dutch? You claim to speak it.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >the plot.
>
> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

Scared.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 30/05/2012 13:07, Justin wrote:
> On 29 mei, 01:36, Peter > wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:24 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>
>>> Silly old sod
>>
>> How pathetically wimpy you ****. What about the greater honour of being
>> spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb and
>> evasive you contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist,
>> avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged twerp?
>>
>> --
>> Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.
>
> And those are his mitigating qualities. Homophobic, mysoginstic,
> neanderthal, semi-evolved, simian, cheap, mendacious, cowardly,
> illiterate, unlettered, reptillian, xenophobic and supturating leap
> immediately to mind as additions which may help complete the less
> unpleasant half of the picture.


Whoosh....

**** sakes, he makes Mason look bright doesn't he?


--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Justin[_3_]]

On 30 mei, 20:39, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 30/05/2012 13:07, Justin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 29 mei, 01:36, Peter > *wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:24 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>
> >>> Silly old sod
>
> >> How pathetically wimpy you ****. *What about the greater honour of being
> >> spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb and
> >> evasive you contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist,
> >> avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged twerp?
>
> >> --
> >> Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.
>
> > And those are his mitigating qualities. Homophobic, mysoginstic,
> > neanderthal, semi-evolved, simian, cheap, mendacious, cowardly,
> > illiterate, unlettered, reptillian, xenophobic and supturating leap
> > immediately to mind as additions which may help complete the less
> > unpleasant half of the picture.
>
> Whoosh....
>
> **** sakes, he makes Mason look bright doesn't he?
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University

It's the Medway Bottler. Best Western, Marks Tey? Put up or shut up.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >> >the plot.
>
> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> --
> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> FrontMech
> >> Billsgate
> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> J.M.Messie
> >>
> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >cartoon charavtrr
>
> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> --
> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> FrontMech
> Billsgate
> Ricky Bikebloke
> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> J.M.Messie
>
> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.

Which word is Dutch? You have attempted to profile yourself as an
expert, making comments about my inability to speak/translate it and
about Mason's grammar. You don't even have to identify yourself here,
just show a bit of backbone. Come on let's see it.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 30/05/2012 17:53, Judith wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), >
> wrote:
>
>> On 28 mei, 23:54, > wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 24 mei, 15:18, > wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> On 23 mei, 12:33, > wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W > wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>>>>>>>> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>>>>>>>>> and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>>
>>>>>>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>>>>>>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>>
>>>>>>> ================================================== =============
>>>>>>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>>>>>>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>>
>>>>>>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>>>>>>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>>>>>>> pass dangerously close.
>>>
>>>>>>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>>>>>>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>>>>>>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>>
>>>>>>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>>>>>>> permission to proceed.
>>>>>>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>>
>>>>>>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>>>>>>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. In this they are now equally
>>>>>>> clearly in contempt of court.
>>>
>>>>>>> It could usefilly<sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>>>>>>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>>>>>>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>>
>>>>>>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>>>>>>> driving safely or legally.
>>>
>>>>>>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>>>>>>> into permanent inability to drive
>>>
>>>>>>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>>>>>>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>>>>>>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>>>>>>> decades.
>>>
>>>>>>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
>>>>>>> again.
>>>
>>>>>>> ================================================== ========
>>>
>>>>>> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>>>>>> the plot.
>>>
>>>>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>>
>>>>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>>
>>>>> You really are thick you know.
>>>
>>>> I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>>>> my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>>>> money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>>>> Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>>
>>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>>
>>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>>> --
>>> Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>>> FrontMech
>>> Billsgate
>>> Ricky Bikebloke
>>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>>> J.M.Messie
>>>
>>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>>> He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>> I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
>> cartoon charavtrr
>
>
> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?

I think he is just ****ed Judith...

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Wed, 30 May 2012 19:39:08 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:

> On 30/05/2012 13:07, Justin wrote:
>> On 29 mei, 01:36, Peter > wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:24 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>>
>>>> Silly old sod
>>>
>>> How pathetically wimpy you ****. What about the greater honour of
>>> being spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive,
>>> dumb and evasive you contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted,
>>> racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged twerp?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.
>>
>> And those are his mitigating qualities. Homophobic, mysoginstic,
>> neanderthal, semi-evolved, simian, cheap, mendacious, cowardly,
>> illiterate, unlettered, reptillian, xenophobic and supturating leap
>> immediately to mind as additions which may help complete the less
>> unpleasant half of the picture.
>
>
> Whoosh....
>
> **** sakes, he makes Mason look bright doesn't he?

And proud of it. Thank you for the great unmitigated compliment.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 31 mei, 09:30, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 30/05/2012 17:53, Judith wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), >
> > wrote:
>
> >> On 28 mei, 23:54, > *wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 24 mei, 15:18, > *wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 23 mei, 12:33, > *wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W > *wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Peter > *considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >>>>>>>> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >>>>>>>>> and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >>>>>>>> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >>>>>>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >>>>>>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >>>>>>> ================================================== =============
> >>>>>>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >>>>>>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >>>>>>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >>>>>>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >>>>>>> pass dangerously close.
>
> >>>>>>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >>>>>>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >>>>>>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >>>>>>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >>>>>>> permission to proceed.
> >>>>>>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >>>>>>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >>>>>>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >>>>>>> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >>>>>>> It could usefilly<sic> *be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >>>>>>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >>>>>>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >>>>>>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >>>>>>> driving safely or legally.
>
> >>>>>>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >>>>>>> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >>>>>>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >>>>>>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >>>>>>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >>>>>>> decades.
>
> >>>>>>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >>>>>>> again.
>
> >>>>>>> ================================================== ========
>
> >>>>>> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >>>>>> the plot.
>
> >>>>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >>>>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >>>>> You really are thick you know.
>
> >>>> I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >>>> my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >>>> money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >>>> Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >>> --
> >>> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >>> FrontMech
> >>> Billsgate
> >>> Ricky Bikebloke
> >>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >>> J.M.Messie
> >>>
> >>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >>> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >> I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >> cartoon charavtrr
>
> > Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> I think he is just ****ed Judith...
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University

I cannot be ****ed Judith - Judith is another person.

I could have been ****ed Justin, were it not for the fact that I use
no alcohol. Alcohol and sport training do not mix.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 31 mei, 09:30, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 30/05/2012 17:53, Judith wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), >
> > wrote:
>
> >> On 28 mei, 23:54, > *wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 24 mei, 15:18, > *wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 23 mei, 12:33, > *wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W > *wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Peter > *considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >>>>>>>> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >>>>>>>>> and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >>>>>>>> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >>>>>>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >>>>>>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >>>>>>> ================================================== =============
> >>>>>>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >>>>>>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >>>>>>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >>>>>>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >>>>>>> pass dangerously close.
>
> >>>>>>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >>>>>>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >>>>>>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >>>>>>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >>>>>>> permission to proceed.
> >>>>>>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >>>>>>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >>>>>>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >>>>>>> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >>>>>>> It could usefilly<sic> *be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >>>>>>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >>>>>>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >>>>>>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >>>>>>> driving safely or legally.
>
> >>>>>>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >>>>>>> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >>>>>>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >>>>>>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >>>>>>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >>>>>>> decades.
>
> >>>>>>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >>>>>>> again.
>
> >>>>>>> ================================================== ========
>
> >>>>>> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >>>>>> the plot.
>
> >>>>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >>>>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >>>>> You really are thick you know.
>
> >>>> I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >>>> my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >>>> money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >>>> Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >>> --
> >>> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >>> FrontMech
> >>> Billsgate
> >>> Ricky Bikebloke
> >>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >>> J.M.Messie
> >>>
> >>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >>> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >> I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >> cartoon charavtrr
>
> > Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> I think he is just ****ed Judith...
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University

How can I be ****ed Judith?
Judith may well be ****ed Judith: ask him next time you ha ha ha meet.

I may have been ****ed Justin, were it not for the fact that I do not
touch alcohol (for both my hobbies).

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 31/05/2012 09:37, Justin wrote:
> On 31 mei, 09:30, Dave - Cyclists >
> wrote:
>> On 30/05/2012 17:53, Judith wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), >
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> On 28 mei, 23:54, > wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On 24 mei, 15:18, > wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On 23 mei, 12:33, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>>>>>>>>>> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>>>>>>>>>>> and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>>>>>>>>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>>>>>>>>> ================================================== =============
>>>>>>>>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>>>>>>>>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>>>>>>>>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>>>>>>>>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>>>>>>>>> pass dangerously close.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>>>>>>>>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>>>>>>>>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>>>>>>>>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>>>>>>>>> permission to proceed.
>>>>>>>>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>>>>>>>>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>>>>>>>>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. In this they are now equally
>>>>>>>>> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>>>>>>>>> It could usefilly<sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>>>>>>>>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>>>>>>>>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>>>>>>>>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>>>>>>>>> driving safely or legally.
>>
>>>>>>>>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>>>>>>>>> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>>>>>>>>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>>>>>>>>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>>>>>>>>> decades.
>>
>>>>>>>>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>>>>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>>>>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. He'll never drive a taxi
>>>>>>>>> again.
>>
>>>>>>>>> ================================================== ========
>>
>>>>>>>> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>>>>>>>> the plot.
>>
>>>>>>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>>>>>>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>>>>>>> You really are thick you know.
>>
>>>>>> I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>>>>>> my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>>>>>> money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>>>>>> Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>
>>>>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>
>>>>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>>>>> --
>>>>> Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>>>>> FrontMech
>>>>> Billsgate
>>>>> Ricky Bikebloke
>>>>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>>>>> J.M.Messie
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>>>>> He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>>>> I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
>>>> cartoon charavtrr
>>
>>> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>>
>> I think he is just ****ed Judith...
>>
>> --
>> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
>> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
>> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
>> University
>
> How can I be ****ed Judith?
> Judith may well be ****ed Judith: ask him next time you ha ha ha meet.
>
> I may have been ****ed Justin, were it not for the fact that I do not
> touch alcohol (for both my hobbies).


Replies to the same post twice & claims he isn't ****ed?

I assume the second hobby is snogging blokes?

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Justin[_3_]]

On 31 mei, 19:31, Dave - Cyclists VOR >
wrote:
> On 31/05/2012 09:37, Justin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 31 mei, 09:30, Dave - Cyclists >
> > wrote:
> >> On 30/05/2012 17:53, Judith wrote:
>
> >>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 28 mei, 23:54, > * *wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 24 mei, 15:18, > * *wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On 23 mei, 12:33, > * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W > * *wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Peter > * *considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >>>>>>>>>> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >>>>>>>>>>> and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >>>>>>>>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >>>>>>>>> ================================================== =============
> >>>>>>>>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >>>>>>>>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >>>>>>>>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >>>>>>>>> pass dangerously close.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >>>>>>>>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >>>>>>>>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >>>>>>>>> permission to proceed.
> >>>>>>>>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >>>>>>>>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >>>>>>>>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. *In this they are now equally
> >>>>>>>>> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >>>>>>>>> It could usefilly<sic> * *be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >>>>>>>>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >>>>>>>>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >>>>>>>>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >>>>>>>>> driving safely or legally.
>
> >>>>>>>>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >>>>>>>>> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >>>>>>>>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >>>>>>>>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >>>>>>>>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >>>>>>>>> decades.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >>>>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >>>>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. *He'll never drive a taxi
> >>>>>>>>> again.
>
> >>>>>>>>> ================================================== ========
>
> >>>>>>>> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >>>>>>>> the plot.
>
> >>>>>>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >>>>>>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >>>>>>> You really are thick you know.
>
> >>>>>> I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >>>>>> my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >>>>>> money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >>>>>> Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >>>>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >>>>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >>>>> FrontMech
> >>>>> Billsgate
> >>>>> Ricky Bikebloke
> >>>>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >>>>> J.M.Messie
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >>>>> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >>>> I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >>>> cartoon charavtrr
>
> >>> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> >> I think he is just ****ed Judith...
>
> >> --
> >> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> >> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> >> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> >> University
>
> > How can I be ****ed Judith?
> > Judith may well be ****ed Judith: ask him next time you ha ha ha meet.
>
> > I may have been ****ed Justin, were it not for the fact that I do not
> > touch alcohol (for both my hobbies).
>
> Replies to the same post twice & claims he isn't ****ed?
>
> I assume the second hobby is snogging blokes?
>
> --
> Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
> legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
> vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
> University
You also assume that s consul is a console.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Wed, 30 May 2012 23:28:04 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
>> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>>
>> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
>> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
>> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> >> >> >> decades.
>>
>> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
>> >> >> >> again.
>>
>> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>>
>> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>> >> >> >the plot.
>>
>> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>>
>> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>
>> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>
>> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> >> --
>> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> >> FrontMech
>> >> Billsgate
>> >> Ricky Bikebloke
>> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> >> J.M.Messie
>> >>
>> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
>> >cartoon charavtrr
>>
>> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>>
>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> --
>> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> FrontMech
>> Billsgate
>> Ricky Bikebloke
>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> J.M.Messie
>>
>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
>Which word is Dutch? You have attempted to profile yourself as an
>expert, making comments about my inability to speak/translate it and
>about Mason's grammar. You don't even have to identify yourself here,
>just show a bit of backbone. Come on let's see it.


I think it must be either "voeardly" or "charavtrr" - can you help out please?


On the other hand

Wooooooosh

Still lying for England I see. Does that make you English I wonder.

[Judith[_4_]]

On Thu, 31 May 2012 07:52:09 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller >
wrote:

>On Wed, 30 May 2012 19:39:08 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>
>> On 30/05/2012 13:07, Justin wrote:
>>> On 29 mei, 01:36, Peter > wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:39:24 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Silly old sod
>>>>
>>>> How pathetically wimpy you ****. What about the greater honour of
>>>> being spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive,
>>>> dumb and evasive you contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted,
>>>> racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged twerp?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.
>>>
>>> And those are his mitigating qualities. Homophobic, mysoginstic,
>>> neanderthal, semi-evolved, simian, cheap, mendacious, cowardly,
>>> illiterate, unlettered, reptillian, xenophobic and supturating leap
>>> immediately to mind as additions which may help complete the less
>>> unpleasant half of the picture.
>>
>>
>> Whoosh....
>>
>> **** sakes, he makes Mason look bright doesn't he?
>
>And proud of it. Thank you for the great unmitigated compliment.



Sorry sunshine - however you look at it - making Mason look bright is never a
compliment. See if you can work that out for yourself.

[Peter Keller[_3_]]

On Thu, 31 May 2012 22:41:32 +0100, Judith wrote:

> sunshine

Sunshine? Is that the best you can o you vorephilic ****? What is wrong
with the higher accolade of being degenerate, noxious and depraved you
jerk, cad, weasel, stench and revulsion?



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 31 mei, 23:39, Judith > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 23:28:04 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
> >> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
> >> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >> >> >the plot.
>
> >> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> >> --
> >> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> >> FrontMech
> >> >> Billsgate
> >> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> >> J.M.Messie
> >> >>
> >> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >> >cartoon charavtrr
>
> >> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> --
> >> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> FrontMech
> >> Billsgate
> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> J.M.Messie
> >>
> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >Which word is Dutch? You have attempted to profile yourself as an
> >expert, making comments about my inability to speak/translate it and
> >about Mason's grammar. You don't even have to identify yourself here,
> >just show a bit of backbone. Come on let's see it.
>
> I think it must be either *"voeardly" or "charavtrr" - can you help out please?
>
> On the other hand
>
> Wooooooosh
>
> Still lying for England I see. *Does that make you English I wonder.

Your post collapses at the point you allege that you see something.
Collapses, just like the spineless talent-bypass that wrote it.

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 01/06/2012 05:31, Justin wrote:
> On 31 mei, 23:39, > wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 23:28:04 -0700 (PDT), >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 30 mei, 18:53, > wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 28 mei, 23:54, > wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On 24 mei, 15:18, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23 mei, 12:33, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a ****wit.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>>>>>>>>>>>> and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>>>>>>>>>> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> ================================================== =============
>>>>>>>>>> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>>>>>>>>>> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>>>>>>>>>> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>>>>>>>>>> pass dangerously close.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>>>>>>>>>> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>>>>>>>>>> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>>>>>>>>>> permission to proceed.
>>>>>>>>>> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>>>>>>>>>> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>>>>>>>>>> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
>>>>>>>>>> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> It could usefilly<sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>>>>>>>>>> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>>>>>>>>>> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>>>>>>>>>> driving safely or legally.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>>>>>>>>>> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>>>>>>>>>> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>>>>>>>>>> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>>>>>>>>>> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>>>>>>>>>> decades.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>>>>>>>>>> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>>>>>>>>>> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
>>>>>>>>>> again.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> ================================================== ========
>>
>>>>>>>>> Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>>>>>>>>> the plot.
>>
>>>>>>>> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>>>>>>>> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>>>>>>>> You really are thick you know.
>>
>>>>>>> I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>>>>>>> my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>>>>>>> money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>>>>>>> Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>
>>>>>> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>
>>>>>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>>>>>> FrontMech
>>>>>> Billsgate
>>>>>> Ricky Bikebloke
>>>>>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>>>>>> J.M.Messie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>>>>>> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>>>>> I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
>>>>> cartoon charavtrr
>>
>>>> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>>
>>>> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>>>> --
>>>> Justin (Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>>>> FrontMech
>>>> Billsgate
>>>> Ricky Bikebloke
>>>> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>>>> J.M.Messie
>>>>
>>>> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>>>> He has denied it. Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>>> Which word is Dutch? You have attempted to profile yourself as an
>>> expert, making comments about my inability to speak/translate it and
>>> about Mason's grammar. You don't even have to identify yourself here,
>>> just show a bit of backbone. Come on let's see it.
>>
>> I think it must be either "voeardly" or "charavtrr" - can you help out please?
>>
>> On the other hand
>>
>> Wooooooosh
>>
>> Still lying for England I see. Does that make you English I wonder.
>
> Your post collapses at the point you allege that you see something.

Are you suggesting that Judith is blind now?



--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

[Judith[_4_]]

On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:31:43 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
wrote:

>On 31 mei, 23:39, Judith > wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 23:28:04 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
>> >> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
>> >> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
>> >> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
>> >> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
>> >> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
>> >> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
>> >> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
>> >> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
>> >> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
>> >> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
>> >> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
>> >> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
>> >> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
>> >> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
>> >> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>>
>> >> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
>> >> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
>> >> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh.
>> >> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
>> >> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
>> >> >> >> >> decades.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
>> >> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
>> >> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
>> >> >> >> >> again.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>>
>> >> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
>> >> >> >> >the plot.
>>
>> >> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>>
>> >> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>>
>> >> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>>
>> >> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
>> >> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
>> >> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
>> >> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>>
>> >> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>>
>> >> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> >> >> FrontMech
>> >> >> Billsgate
>> >> >> Ricky Bikebloke
>> >> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> >> >> J.M.Messie
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> >> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>> >> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
>> >> >cartoon charavtrr
>>
>> >> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>>
>> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
>> >> --
>> >> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
>> >> FrontMech
>> >> Billsgate
>> >> Ricky Bikebloke
>> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
>> >> J.M.Messie
>> >>
>> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
>> >> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>>
>> >Which word is Dutch? You have attempted to profile yourself as an
>> >expert, making comments about my inability to speak/translate it and
>> >about Mason's grammar. You don't even have to identify yourself here,
>> >just show a bit of backbone. Come on let's see it.
>>
>> I think it must be either *"voeardly" or "charavtrr" - can you help out please?
>>
>> On the other hand
>>
>> Wooooooosh
>>
>> Still lying for England I see. *Does that make you English I wonder.
>
>Your post collapses at the point you allege that you see something.
>Collapses, just like the spineless talent-bypass that wrote it.

Diddums - did the naughty lady take the **** out of him.

Ho, ho, ho.

Are you English - or have you lost your Nationality?

Displaced person are you?

That is a real Bill-no-mates.

[Justin[_3_]]

On 1 jun, 13:10, Judith > wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:31:43 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 31 mei, 23:39, Judith > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 23:28:04 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 30 mei, 18:53, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On 28 mei, 23:54, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >On 24 mei, 15:18, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT), Justin >
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On 23 mei, 12:33, Judith > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012 22:43:50 +0100, Phil W Lee > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Peter Keller > considered Tue, 22 May 2012
> >> >> >> >> >> >09:10:43 +0000 (UTC) the perfect time to write:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:59:30 +0100, Judith wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> a ****wit.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>If you are a stranger entering a new group, it is a good idea to learn
> >> >> >> >> >> >>and use polite speech, avoiding words that would offend.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Indeed - they don't come much stranger than the J-Troll!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Yes - she is terrible -always pointing out what the W in Anchor Lee's name
> >> >> >> >> >> stands for and repeating the things he has posted previously.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> ================================================== =============
> >> >> >> >> >> If you find 2 abreast cyclists more obstructive than single file ones, you must
> >> >> >> >> >> have been intending to pass dangerously close anyway.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> If you claim to be held up by a cyclist, you are admitting to dangerous
> >> >> >> >> >> driving, since the only way you could be held up is if your intention was to
> >> >> >> >> >> pass dangerously close.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Commenting on a legal gate in a public park: I'd think it comes under the
> >> >> >> >> >> heading of "causing an obstruction",
> >> >> >> >> >> and should be investigated by the police as such.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> If Traffic Lights are not working, then you can telephone the police for
> >> >> >> >> >> permission to proceed.
> >> >> >> >> >> If this is not forthcoming, then you can reports it as "unlawful detention".
>
> >> >> >> >> >> The police have clearly not been persuaded by the Law Lords, and still
> >> >> >> >> >> try to treat the procession as unlawful. �In this they are now equally
> >> >> >> >> >> clearly in contempt of court.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> It could usefilly <sic> be pointed out to motorists that if they are within
> >> >> >> >> >> range of a swung D lock, they are too close, and could be held liable
> >> >> >> >> >> for any collision (including with the D lock).
>
> >> >> >> >> >> If you are watching your kids in the rear view mirror, you are not
> >> >> >> >> >> driving safely or legally.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> I would find it very hard to condemn anyone who beat the van driver
> >> >> >> >> >> into permanent inability to drive
>
> >> >> >> >> >> I hope he hits you next, then we can all have a good laugh..
> >> >> >> >> >> With any luck, you will be a dribbling vegetable in permanent pain
> >> >> >> >> >> afterwards, but will continue your sad existence for many painful
> >> >> >> >> >> decades.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> If the *******s won't do anything about the taxi driver risking
> >> >> >> >> >> people's lives by dangerous driving, book him to take your kids on a
> >> >> >> >> >> trip, then report him for kiddy-fiddling. �He'll never drive a taxi
> >> >> >> >> >> again.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> ================================================== ========
>
> >> >> >> >> >Ha HA Ha Ha Judith (a 57 year old comb-over Collingurst male) has lost
> >> >> >> >> >the plot.
>
> >> >> >> >> Oh dear, oh dear.
>
> >> >> >> >> has Justin Ride-a-bikey-blokey not been able to understand the post?
>
> >> >> >> >> You really are thick you know.
>
> >> >> >> >I do love the way that you are so interested in me that you reply to
> >> >> >> >my every post yet are too chicken-**** scared to meet me. Put your
> >> >> >> >money where your mouth is, say it to my face.
> >> >> >> >Please reply in your usual fashion. Bottler.
>
> >> >> >> I have said: why on earth would anyone want to meet a large steaming turd?
>
> >> >> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Justin �(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> >> >> FrontMech
> >> >> >> Billsgate
> >> >> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> >> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> >> >> J.M.Messie
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> >> >> He has denied it. �Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >> >> >I love the way you react to my every post with a voeardly amonymous
> >> >> >cartoon charavtrr
>
> >> >> Why are you mixing Dutch words in with the English there?
>
> >> >> Hello it's Nobhead Lewis:
> >> >> --
> >> >> Justin *(Nobhead) Lewis has been caught using the following names:
> >> >> FrontMech
> >> >> Billsgate
> >> >> Ricky Bikebloke
> >> >> Sedentary IgnorantPopulist
> >> >> J.M.Messie
> >> >>
> >> >> Jacqueline Lewis-Wintjens
> >> >> He has denied it. *Nobhead Lewis is a liar.
>
> >> >Which word is Dutch? You have attempted to profile yourself as an
> >> >expert, making comments about my inability to speak/translate it and
> >> >about Mason's grammar. You don't even have to identify yourself here,
> >> >just show a bit of backbone. Come on let's see it.
>
> >> I think it must be either *"voeardly" or "charavtrr" - can you help out please?
>
> >> On the other hand
>
> >> Wooooooosh
>
> >> Still lying for England I see. *Does that make you English I wonder.
>
> >Your post collapses at the point you allege that you see something.
> >Collapses, just like the spineless talent-bypass that wrote it.
>
> Diddums - did the naughty lady take the **** out of him.
>
> Ho, ho, ho.
>
> Are you English - or have you lost your Nationality?
How could that happen?
> Displaced person are you?
>
> That is a real Bill-no-mates.

The 51 year old man from Collinghurst that masquerades as a lady has
said nothing to upset anyone. No self-respecting person can get upset
about anything said anonymously. See you when you get that spine-
implant.