Cyclist tosser in narrow street

[Mr Pounder]

I was driving down a quite narrow one way street today, in front of me was a
cyclist. He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing him.
Behind me was a police car. I shoved my arm out of the window and pointed
over the car roof towards the ****** on the child's toy.
The policeman gave a quick blast of his siren and the ****** nearly fell of
his bike. He then pulled over.
In passing him I shouted "******" out of the passenger window. Looking in
the mirror it seemed that the policeman was having words with him.
Made my day did that.

[adam[_3_]]

On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was deliberately trying
> and succeeding in preventing me from passing him.
Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is not safe
for a car to overtake but that all depends on the circumstances.

How fast was he going?
What was the speed limit on that road?
Were there cars parked along the left hand side of the road?

> In passing him I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
Road manners at their best.

[Rob Morley]

On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
adam > wrote:

> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
> > He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
> > deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
> > him.
> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
> circumstances.
>
I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
"taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.

[The Medway Handyman[_4_]]

On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
> adam > wrote:
>
>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>> him.
>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>> circumstances.
>>
> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>

"taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
Cyclists should know their place.




--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

[Mr Pounder]

"adam" > wrote in message
...
> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was deliberately
>> trying
>> and succeeding in preventing me from passing him.
>
Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is not
safe
> for a car to overtake but that all depends on the circumstances.

The reason for it was to prevent me passing him. I have safely passed all
other cyclists in this street.
You admit that you have done the safe stunt, thus you are as big a ****** as
he is.
>
> How fast was he going?

As slowly as he could without falling off.

What was the speed limit on that road?

20mph.

> Were there cars parked along the left hand side of the road?

No.

>
>> In passing him I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
>
Road manners at their best.

Do you have a better name for this law breaker?

[Mr Pounder]

"Rob Morley" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
> adam > wrote:
>
>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>> > He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>> > deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>> > him.
>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>> circumstances.
>>
> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.

There was plenty of room.
>

[Mr Pounder]

"The Medway Handyman" > wrote in message
...
> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>> adam > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>> him.
>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>> circumstances.
>>>
>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>
>
> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
> Cyclists should know their place.

Gutter.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

[The Medway Handyman[_4_]]

On 09/04/2015 15:57, adam wrote:
> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was deliberately trying
>> and succeeding in preventing me from passing him.
> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is not safe
> for a car to overtake but that all depends on the circumstances.

That isn't your decision to make. Typical arrogance of cyclists.
>
> How fast was he going?
> What was the speed limit on that road?
> Were there cars parked along the left hand side of the road?
>
>> In passing him I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
> Road manners at their best.
>


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

[jnugent]

On 09/04/2015 15:57, adam wrote{

> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was deliberately trying
>> and succeeding in preventing me from passing him.

> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is not safe
> for a car to overtake but that all depends on the circumstances.

You're a police officer, then?

> How fast was he going?
> What was the speed limit on that road?

From what was said in the OP, the cyclisty was clearly travelling at
significantly less than the speed limit.

> Were there cars parked along the left hand side of the road?

The implication is that he could have been overaten safely but for his
anti-social behaviour.

If you're in any doubt about that, please re-read the post. What is
included (all of it) and what is not mentioned is all significant.
>
>> In passing him I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.

> Road manners at their best.

Deliberatly provoking and aggravating other road users is never a good
idea, is it?

[Bod[_5_]]

On 09/04/2015 18:08, The Medway Handyman wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>> adam > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>> him.
>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>> circumstances.
>>>
>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>
>
> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
> Cyclists should know their place.
>
>
>
>
I actually agree with you on that (a first).
When I'm cycling along the narrow country roads around here, if I see or
hear car coming, I stop and pull over close to the edge of the road (no
footpaths) where necessary.

[jnugent]

On 09/04/2015 19:54, Bod wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 18:08, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>>> adam > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>>> him.
>>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>>> circumstances.
>>>>
>>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
>>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
>>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>>
>>
>> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
>> Cyclists should know their place.

> I actually agree with you on that (a first).
> When I'm cycling along the narrow country roads around here, if I see or
> hear car coming, I stop and pull over close to the edge of the road (no
> footpaths) where necessary.

I do exactly the same when I'm walking.

[Bod[_5_]]

On 09/04/2015 19:56, JNugent wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 19:54, Bod wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 18:08, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>>>> adam > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>>>> him.
>>>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>>>> circumstances.
>>>>>
>>>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over
>>>> the
>>>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
>>>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>>>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>>>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
>>> Cyclists should know their place.
>
>> I actually agree with you on that (a first).
>> When I'm cycling along the narrow country roads around here, if I see or
>> hear car coming, I stop and pull over close to the edge of the road (no
>> footpaths) where necessary.
>
> I do exactly the same when I'm walking.
>
Yup, it's only common sense.

[jnugent]

On 09/04/2015 20:00, Bod wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 19:56, JNugent wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 19:54, Bod wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2015 18:08, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>>>> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>>>>> adam > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>>>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>>>>> circumstances.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over
>>>>> the
>>>>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than
>>>>> someone
>>>>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>>>>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>>>>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
>>>> Cyclists should know their place.
>>
>>> I actually agree with you on that (a first).
>>> When I'm cycling along the narrow country roads around here, if I see or
>>> hear car coming, I stop and pull over close to the edge of the road (no
>>> footpaths) where necessary.
>
>> I do exactly the same when I'm walking.
>
> Yup, it's only common sense.

Well, common sense and consideration.

[Bod[_5_]]

On 09/04/2015 20:15, JNugent wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 20:00, Bod wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 19:56, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2015 19:54, Bod wrote:
>>>> On 09/04/2015 18:08, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>>>>> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>>>>>> adam > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>>>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>>>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>>>>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>>>>>> circumstances.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than
>>>>>> someone
>>>>>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>>>>>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>>>>>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
>>>>> Cyclists should know their place.
>>>
>>>> I actually agree with you on that (a first).
>>>> When I'm cycling along the narrow country roads around here, if I
>>>> see or
>>>> hear car coming, I stop and pull over close to the edge of the road (no
>>>> footpaths) where necessary.
>>
>>> I do exactly the same when I'm walking.
>>
>> Yup, it's only common sense.
>
> Well, common sense and consideration.
>
Indeed.

[Mr Pounder]

"JNugent" > wrote in message
...
> On 09/04/2015 15:57, adam wrote{
>
>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was deliberately
>>> trying
>>> and succeeding in preventing me from passing him.
>
>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is not
>> safe
>> for a car to overtake but that all depends on the circumstances.
>
> You're a police officer, then?
>
>> How fast was he going?
>> What was the speed limit on that road?
>
> From what was said in the OP, the cyclisty was clearly travelling at
> significantly less than the speed limit.
>
>> Were there cars parked along the left hand side of the road?
>
> The implication is that he could have been overaten safely but for his
> anti-social behaviour.
>
> If you're in any doubt about that, please re-read the post. What is
> included (all of it) and what is not mentioned is all significant.

There is nothing else to mention.




>>
>>> In passing him I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
>
>> Road manners at their best.
>
> Deliberatly provoking and aggravating other road users is never a good
> idea, is it?

[Mr Pounder]

"Bod" > wrote in message
...
> On 09/04/2015 18:08, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 16:18, Rob Morley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:57:03 GMT
>>> adam > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-04-09, Mr Pounder > wrote:
>>>>> He was all over the road and it was obvious that he was
>>>>> deliberately trying and succeeding in preventing me from passing
>>>>> him.
>>>> Perhaps there was a reason for that. I do that sometimes when it is
>>>> not safe for a car to overtake but that all depends on the
>>>> circumstances.
>>>>
>>> I've been held up behind defective youths purposely weaving all over the
>>> road just to antagonise drivers, this sound more like that than someone
>>> "taking the lane", which doesn't require weaving about - if you need
>>> to weave to stop someone passing, then there's almost certainly room
>>> for them to pass safely if you stop arsing around.
>>>
>>
>> "taking the lane" is antagonising to drivers & shouldn't be allowed.
>> Cyclists should know their place.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I actually agree with you on that (a first).
> When I'm cycling along the narrow country roads around here, if I see or
> hear car coming, I stop and pull over close to the edge of the road (no
> footpaths) where necessary.

Why did you see fit to mention this?

[Simon Jester]

On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>
>I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.

Why did you feel the need to broadcast your hobby to the entire world?

[Mr Pounder]

"Simon Jester" > wrote in message
...
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>>
>>I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
>
> Why did you feel the need to broadcast your hobby to the entire world?

I don't, cyclists obviously do.

>

[Simon Jester]

On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 9:07:41 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
> "Simon Jester" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
> >>
> >>I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
> >
> > Why did you feel the need to broadcast your hobby to the entire world?
>
> I don't, cyclists obviously do.
>

I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.

[The Medway Handyman[_4_]]

On 10/04/2015 22:07, Simon Jester wrote:
> On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 9:07:41 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>> "Simon Jester" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
>>>
>>> Why did you feel the need to broadcast your hobby to the entire world?
>>
>> I don't, cyclists obviously do.
>>
>
> I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.
>

I'm sure you won't.

Few, if any females would stop laughing at you being a cyclist long
enough. And if you did find a female who did, your cycling causes you to
fire blanks anyway.

Q; What do you call a cyclists girlfriend?
A; Inflatable.




--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

[Tarcap]

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...

On 10/04/2015 22:07, Simon Jester wrote:
> On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 9:07:41 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>> "Simon Jester" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
>>>
>>> Why did you feel the need to broadcast your hobby to the entire world?
>>
>> I don't, cyclists obviously do.
>>
>
> I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.
>

I'm sure you won't.

Few, if any females would stop laughing at you being a cyclist long
enough. And if you did find a female who did, your cycling causes you to
fire blanks anyway.

Q; What do you call a cyclists girlfriend?
A; Inflatable.



Either that or desperate.

[Simon Jester]

On Saturday, April 11, 2015 at 10:03:40 AM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
> On 10/04/2015 22:07, Simon Jester wrote:

> >
> > I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.
> >
>
> I'm sure you won't.
>

You have invented time travel?

[Tarcap]

"Simon Jester" wrote in message
...

On Saturday, April 11, 2015 at 10:03:40 AM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
> On 10/04/2015 22:07, Simon Jester wrote:

> >
> > I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.
> >
>
> I'm sure you won't.
>

You have invented time travel?


No. Going solo doesn't count.

[The Medway Handyman[_4_]]

On 12/04/2015 00:11, Simon Jester wrote:
> On Saturday, April 11, 2015 at 10:03:40 AM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>> On 10/04/2015 22:07, Simon Jester wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sure you won't.
>>
>
> You have invented time travel?
>
>
>
If I had cyclists would want someone else to pay for it and then demand
special facilities for free.

I wonder if there is a connection with puncture repair kits and
cyclist's girlfriends?


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

[jnugent]

On 10/04/2015 22:07, Simon Jester wrote:
> On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 9:07:41 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>> "Simon Jester" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I shouted "******" out of the passenger window.
>>>
>>> Why did you feel the need to broadcast your hobby to the entire world?
>>
>> I don't, cyclists obviously do.
>>
>
> I'm sure you will lose your virginity one day.

<http://www.anony.ws/image/DUWt>

[It's just a harmless image; not an *'exe file or anything remotely
similar. Just a picture.]

[Simon Jester]

On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 9:36:08 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

> <http://www.anony.ws/image/DUWt>
>
> [It's just a harmless image; not an *'exe file or anything remotely
> similar. Just a picture.]

Very good, reminds me of this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBFFrsvgu1Y

[Simon Jester]

On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 12:54:09 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
> On 12/04/2015 00:11, Simon Jester wrote:

> >
> > You have invented time travel?

> If I had cyclists would want someone else to pay for it and then demand
> special facilities for free.
>

Cyclists invented air travel but still have to buy airline tickets.

[jnugent]

On 12/04/2015 22:10, Simon Jester wrote:

> On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 12:54:09 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>> On 12/04/2015 00:11, Simon Jester wrote:
>
>>> You have invented time travel?
>
>> If I had cyclists would want someone else to pay for it and then demand
>> special facilities for free.
>
> Cyclists invented air travel but still have to buy airline tickets.

I never knew that les Freres Montgolfier owned bicycles. They must have
been Mk I models.

[Simon Jester]

On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 10:24:38 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

>
> I never knew that les Freres Montgolfier owned bicycles. They must have
> been Mk I models.

Cyclists invented modern powered flight utilising the coanda effect?

[The Medway Handyman[_4_]]

On 12/04/2015 22:10, Simon Jester wrote:
> On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 12:54:09 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
>> On 12/04/2015 00:11, Simon Jester wrote:
>
>>>
>>> You have invented time travel?
>
>> If I had cyclists would want someone else to pay for it and then demand
>> special facilities for free.
>>
>
> Cyclists invented air travel but still have to buy airline tickets.
>
No they didn't. The Wright Brothers made printing presses as well.

So printers invented air travel.

Another exaggeration from a cyclist.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

[The Medway Handyman[_4_]]

On 12/04/2015 22:05, Simon Jester wrote:
> On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 9:36:08 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
>
>> <http://www.anony.ws/image/DUWt>
>>
>> [It's just a harmless image; not an *'exe file or anything remotely
>> similar. Just a picture.]
>
> Very good, reminds me of this.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBFFrsvgu1Y
>
Excellent! And they admit that Road Tax pays for roads!

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk