PDA

View Full Version : Seats: Vision VS RANS?


Tom Sherman
October 11th 03, 05:19 AM
WizeGuy wrote:
>
> Which one is the most comfortable for a position with BB in-line
> or sligthly lower than the seat?

You are a wise guy, trying to start a religious flame war between the
Visionaries and the Church of RANS. ;)

Tom Sherman - Near the confluence of the Mississippi and Rock Rivers

WizeGuy
October 11th 03, 05:48 AM
Which one is the most comfortable for a position with BB in-line
or sligthly lower than the seat?

TBRADSTER
October 11th 03, 11:54 AM
I own both a Rocket and a VR40. I find the Vision seat much more comfortable.
This is a highly individual choice, though. Most people who own them swear by
the RANS seats. I think that they are very comfortable, just not a much so as
the Vision seat.

Brad
Rocket, GRR, VR40

bentbiker
October 11th 03, 02:13 PM
they both have pros and cons: Pros: RANS-higher seat back, built in
lumbar [some do not like that though] water cage mounts VISION- full
mess, no pressure points on the bottom, easier to install.

Tom Sherman wrote:
> WizeGuy wrote:
>
>>Which one is the most comfortable for a position with BB in-line
>>or sligthly lower than the seat?
>
>
> You are a wise guy, trying to start a religious flame war between the
> Visionaries and the Church of RANS. ;)
>
> Tom Sherman - Near the confluence of the Mississippi and Rock Rivers

bentbiker
October 11th 03, 02:15 PM
I agree.

TBRADSTER wrote:

> I own both a Rocket and a VR40. I find the Vision seat much more comfortable.
> This is a highly individual choice, though. Most people who own them swear by
> the RANS seats. I think that they are very comfortable, just not a much so as
> the Vision seat.
>
> Brad
> Rocket, GRR, VR40

DeVon
October 12th 03, 03:20 AM
bentbiker > wrote in message >...
> they both have pros and cons: Pros: RANS-higher seat back, built in
> lumbar [some do not like that though] water cage mounts VISION- full
> mess, no pressure points on the bottom, easier to install.
>
> Tom Sherman wrote:
> > WizeGuy wrote:
> >
> >>Which one is the most comfortable for a position with BB in-line
> >>or sligthly lower than the seat?
> >
> >
> > You are a wise guy, trying to start a religious flame war between the
> > Visionaries and the Church of RANS. ;)
> >
> > Tom Sherman - Near the confluence of the Mississippi and Rock Rivers

Actually lumbar support is easily customized on a Vision seat using
the straps which attach the seat-back fabric. This could likely be
accomplished on a RANS as well, but on a Vision it is extremely easy
to adjust/dial in.

I've not done more than 20 miles on a RANS but after 30 miles on a
Bacchetta seat (which felt oh-so-comfortable at first), my back-side
was telling me not to mess with a good thing. This (along with my
preference for USS) really was the deciding factor between buying my
4th Vision (now on my 5th) or my first Bacchetta.

DeVon
Vision 44.5 (USS/Pantour hub)

Google

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home