TfL cycling maps

[Orienteer]

Finally got the London cycling maps I requested weeks ago.

Judging by the one for my area (no. 8) they are already a year out of date;
many farcilities built within the last year are missing. Now I recall
speaking to Tom (unpronouncable Polish? name) of the LCC at Cycle 2003 last
September; he said they had prepared the updates early in 2003 and were
still waiting for TfL to publish them.

[John Hearns]

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:57:35 +0000, Orienteer wrote:

> Finally got the London cycling maps I requested weeks ago.
>
> Judging by the one for my area (no. 8) they are already a year out of date;
> many farcilities built within the last year are missing.
The new maps have been out for some time.
They have a picture of a cyclist going past a Pie and Mash shop on the
front.

I'm handing maps out at Burgess Park bike track launch on Saturday.

[Just zis Guy, you know?]

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:57:35 GMT, "Orienteer"
> wrote in message
>:

>Finally got the London cycling maps I requested weeks ago.

Ditto. Maybe they were waiting for a new print run?

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

[Ben]

"Orienteer" > wrote in message
...
> Finally got the London cycling maps I requested weeks ago.
>
> Judging by the one for my area (no. 8) they are already a year out of
date;
> many farcilities built within the last year are missing. Now I recall
> speaking to Tom (unpronouncable Polish? name) of the LCC at Cycle 2003
last
> September; he said they had prepared the updates early in 2003 and were
> still waiting for TfL to publish them.
>

Bogdanowicz, roughly but apparently acceptably pronounced Bog-dan-o-vitch.

[Colin McKenzie]

Orienteer wrote:

> Finally got the London cycling maps I requested weeks ago.
>
> Judging by the one for my area (no. 8) they are already a year out of date;
> many farcilities built within the last year are missing. Now I recall
> speaking to Tom (unpronouncable Polish? name) of the LCC at Cycle 2003 last
> September; he said they had prepared the updates early in 2003 and were
> still waiting for TfL to publish them.

Too right. I sent in a list of corrections well over a year ago and
was told I was too late.

Which part of map 8 are you on? As far as I know the only facility put
in in the Ealing part of the map is the Havelock Road contraflow.
Excitement round Grand Union Village is yet to come.

Colin McKenzie
--
The great advantage of not trusting statistics is that
it leaves you free to believe the damned lies instead!

[Orienteer]

"Colin McKenzie" > wrote in message
...
> Orienteer wrote:
>
> > Finally got the London cycling maps I requested weeks ago.
> >
> > Judging by the one for my area (no. 8) they are already a year out of
date;
> > many farcilities built within the last year are missing. Now I recall
> > speaking to Tom (unpronouncable Polish? name) of the LCC at Cycle 2003
last
> > September; he said they had prepared the updates early in 2003 and were
> > still waiting for TfL to publish them.
>
> Too right. I sent in a list of corrections well over a year ago and
> was told I was too late.
>
> Which part of map 8 are you on? As far as I know the only facility put
> in in the Ealing part of the map is the Havelock Road contraflow.
> Excitement round Grand Union Village is yet to come.
>
> Colin McKenzie
> --
Uxbridge. A large feature missing from the map is: a TfL-funded cycle path
from Ruislip through Ickenham! Construction started well over a year ago and
was the subject of much local debate.