Re: Critical F*cks Tunnel Troll . . . again

[Raoul Duke]

"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
>
>[i]
> > **** them off really good and they will form an army and
> > FIGHT YOU.
>
> =v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
> (and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.

By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally purchasing
fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?

Dave

[Snukey]

"Raoul Duke" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >[i]
> > > **** them off really good and they will form an army and
> > > FIGHT YOU.
> >
> > =v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
> > (and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.
>
> By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally
purchasing
> fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?
>
> Dave
>


He's gonna blow up all the oil wells like Saddam tried too

so no fuel for:

Airplanes,
trains,
electric power companies,
ships
Food transportation,
Trucks
His SUV

He wants to put us back in the Dark ages with the Mullahs,

[Snukey]

"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
> > = Ken [NY)
>
> > What does this discussion have to do with bicycles?
> > Off topic!
>
> =x= Here's a guy who fills bicycle newsgroups with babble
> about Branch Davidians and Islam, but can't seem to figure
> out that Critical Mass and using less oil has anything to
> do with bicycles.
> <_Jym_>


Jym wants to put us back in the Dark ages with the Mullahs.......
No cars, no electricity, everybody in Turbans on bicycles,

> > =v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
> > (and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.
>
> By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally
purchasing fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?
>
> Dave
>


He's gonna blow up all the oil wells like Saddam tried too

so no fuel for:

Airplanes,
trains,
electric power companies,
ships
Food transportation,
Trucks
His SUV

He wants to put us back in the Dark ages with the Mullahs,

[Jack Dingler]

Snukey wrote:

>"Raoul Duke" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>>"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>
>>>[I have removed rec.bicycles.rides from the discussion.]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>**** them off really good and they will form an army and
>>>>FIGHT YOU.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>=v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
>>>(and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.
>>>
>>>
>>By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally
>>
>>
>purchasing
>
>
>>fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?
>>
>>Dave
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>He's gonna blow up all the oil wells like Saddam tried too
>
>so no fuel for:
>
>Airplanes,
>trains,
>electric power companies,
>ships
>Food transportation,
>Trucks
>His SUV
>
>He wants to put us back in the Dark ages with the Mullahs,
>
>
>

Regardless, we're gonna have some pretty wars in the near future over oil.

If you're between the ages of 18 and 36, have you enlisted? If you have
family members in that age range, have you helped them enlist? If not,
why not? Do you believe in terrorism, do you hate the American way of
life? The only way gas is going to get cheaper is if we support our
military and take the world's oil by force. Get out there and fight if
you don't hate America.

Jack Dingler

[Raoul Duke]

"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
> > = Ken [NY)
>
> > What does this discussion have to do with bicycles?
> > Off topic!
>
> =x= Here's a guy who fills bicycle newsgroups with babble
> about Branch Davidians and Islam, but can't seem to figure
> out that Critical Mass and using less oil has anything to
> do with bicycles.
> <_Jym_>

OK, to keep it on topic: How do you and/or Critical Mass plan to prevent
people from legally purchasing fuel for their vehicles?

This is what you meant when you said, " No, "**** them off" doesn't do it.
Keeping oil addicts (and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.",
isn't it?

Dave

[Ruben Safir]

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:25:30 +0000, Jack Dingler wrote:

> If you're between the ages of 18 and 36, have you enlisted? If you have
> family members in that age range, have you helped them enlist? If not,
> why not? Do you believe in terrorism, do you hate the American way of
> life? The only way gas is going to get cheaper is if we support our
> military and take the world's oil by force. Get out there and fight if
> you don't hate America.


As a fact, at 41, I have enlisted, fought and retired honorably from the
US Army.

Furthermore, I have 6 kids including a 13 year old and an 8 year old son.
And picks like you put them in jeopardy because your screwing around with
the necessary and complete military defeat of the Islamic Facisists.

Ruben

[Jack Dingler]

Ken [NY) wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:25:30 GMT, Jack Dingler >
>claims:
>
>
>
>>If you're between the ages of 18 and 36, have you enlisted? If you have
>>family members in that age range, have you helped them enlist? If not,
>>why not? Do you believe in terrorism, do you hate the American way of
>>life?
>>
>>
>
> Have you enlisted yet, Jack?
>
>
>
I'm too old and am a bit crippled up from a car accident. I have good
days and bad days. Boot camp would probably lay me out for a year. I
actually did bother to look at enlistment options recently.

Have you noticed that Nigeria is heating up? As Exxon has a pumping and
refinery station there, US troops may be needed to subdue the populace
to keep the oil flowing. I saw a report that they are down 300,000bpd.
In such a tight market, that is significant. If they were forced to stop
production, you can bet US troops would be mobilized.

Jack Dingler

[Mastic]

"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
> Ken [NY) writes:
>
> > [A bunch of erroneous bicycle/car collision statistics.]
> >
> > Source: Forester, John, Effective Cycling, MIT Press, 1993
> > http://www.borealisoutdoor.com/content/can-bike/crash3.htm
>
> =v= As has already been pointed out on rec.bicycles.soc, these
> stats come from police reports, and a review of police reports
> by the NYC group Right Of Way shows a tendency to simply accept
> the motorist's allegations when there are no eyewitnesses to
> challenge them. When eyewitnesses are there, all of a sudden,
> like magic, motorists turn out to be the parties mostly at
> fault.

So, all motorists tell lies in all accidents with all bicycles.

> =v= As there are no other variables showing any different sort
> of relationship between incidents with or without eyewitnesses,
> the most viable explanation for this discrepancy is that the
> motorists are telling self-serving lies. The police do not
> usually investigate further, so forensic data is not available
> to expose these lies.

So, => all motorists tell lies in all accidents with all bicycles.

>
> =v= In summary: RELIABLE police reports show that motorists
> are usually at fault. UNRELIABLE police reports are numerous
> enough to make the official stats say that bicyclists are
> usually at fault.

=> Conclusion Motorists are ALWAYS at fault.
=> Conclusion Bicyclists NEVER take risks while riding in the streets.

> <_Jym_telling self-serving lies_>


It is hard to accept the responsibility for causing your own death, isn't
it?

[Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS]

Ken [NY) wrote:
>
>
> Good day. Or as John Kerry would say, Bonjour.
>
> Ken (NY)

Hey, Ken--

Can you cite the source of your quotation of Kerry?

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

[Hunrobe]

>Jym Dyer

wrote in part:

>In summary: RELIABLE police reports show that motorists
>are usually at fault. UNRELIABLE police reports are numerous
>enough to make the official stats say that bicyclists are
>usually at fault.

As someone who between 1985 and 1992 wrote countless police reports of crashes
(and yes, I always tried my best to make sure every report I wrote was
reliable) I'd have to disagree with both the above conclusions if "usually at
fault" means that more than half of the time one party bears the overwhelming
responsibility for the crash. IME in the majority of two unit crashes there's
ample fault on *both* parties involved.

Regards,
Bob Hunt

[MikeH]

"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
> Ken [NY) writes:
>
> > [A bunch of erroneous bicycle/car collision statistics.]
> >
> > Source: Forester, John, Effective Cycling, MIT Press, 1993
> > http://www.borealisoutdoor.com/content/can-bike/crash3.htm
>
> =v= As has already been pointed out on rec.bicycles.soc, these
> stats come from police reports, and a review of police reports
> by the NYC group Right Of Way shows a tendency to simply accept
> the motorist's allegations when there are no eyewitnesses to
> challenge them. When eyewitnesses are there, all of a sudden,
> like magic, motorists turn out to be the parties mostly at
> fault.
>

Was the Fault reassigned in these cases, or was Right Of Way just doing a
report?

[Raoul Duke]

"Raoul Duke" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >[i]
> > > **** them off really good and they will form an army and
> > > FIGHT YOU.
> >
> > =v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
> > (and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.
>
> By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally
purchasing
> fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?
>
> Dave

I have posed this question - TWICE - now and have yet to receive an answer.
Why does this not surprise me?

Dave

[Mitch Haley]

Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> "Raoul Duke" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > [I have removed rec.bicycles.rides from the discussion.]
> > >
> > > > **** them off really good and they will form an army and
> > > > FIGHT YOU.
> > >
> > > =v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
> > > (and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.
> >
> > By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally
> purchasing
> > fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?
> >
> > Dave

I believe that global lack of oil, upsetting the oil importing nations,
is what Jym appears to be referring to.

Do you remember the oil embargo of 1974? The Saudis acting alone could cause
similar problems by cutting their output by half today. The same effect
can be achieved simply by waiting for demand to exceed the practical rate
of extraction. With demand monotone increasing, and available oil decreasing,
it will happen. Judging by the current supply problems, we won't have to
wait very long.
Mitch.

[Jym Dyer]

> How do you explain why children and teens are listed as being
> in the wrong almost all of the time, while older, more level
> headed riders are more likely the victims?

=v= The results I'm talking about are independent of that trend.
<_Jym_>

[Jack Dingler]

Ken [NY) wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:14:14 GMT, Jack Dingler >
>claims:
>
>
>
>>Ken [NY) wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:25:30 GMT, Jack Dingler >
>>>claims:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>If you're between the ages of 18 and 36, have you enlisted? If you have
>>>>family members in that age range, have you helped them enlist? If not,
>>>>why not? Do you believe in terrorism, do you hate the American way of
>>>>life?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Have you enlisted yet, Jack?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I'm too old and am a bit crippled up from a car accident. I have good
>>days and bad days. Boot camp would probably lay me out for a year. I
>>actually did bother to look at enlistment options recently.
>>
>>
>
> I am probably older than you, and actually served in a real
>war. But I am weary of seeing you chicken hawks, who never served,
>challenging our younger people to go to war. We of my generation for
>the most part had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the
>military. Some headed for Canada to hide, some future presidents hid
>in Europe.
> Today however, despite no draft, enlistments and reenlistments
>are actually on the increase. So please leave these folks alone. This
>younger generation is putting ours to shame.
>
>
>
>
On the news they keep saying recruitment is way down. The younger
enlistees like National Guardsmen are being reconscripted to keep the
numbers up.

With your experience in the military and policing, I bet they volunteer
you, sometime in the next four years. The fact that you once served
could legally make you an unwilling volunteer. All it requires is some
changes to legislation.

You see though that you didn't pick up on my sarcasm. But technically,
buying gasoline does support terrorism and war. I feel like a
chackenhawk everytime I fill up my tank and think of young men dying or
being injured and many more falling sick from DU poisoning, just to keep
gasoline cheap for me. I feel sick that we have to colonize other
nations so that Bush's friends can be the ones to profit, instead of
letting the market work.

Jack Dingler

[Terry Collins]

Jack Dingler wrote:


....snip.....

> On the news they keep saying recruitment is way down. The younger
> enlistees like National Guardsmen are being reconscripted to keep the
> numbers up.
>
> With your experience in the military and policing,

Someone dropped a figure today that they are seeking 65,000 more
military policepersons.

Is this on the news in the USA?

[Jack Dingler]

Pete wrote:

>"Jack Dingler" > wrote
>
>
>
>>You see though that you didn't pick up on my sarcasm. But technically,
>>buying gasoline does support terrorism and war. I feel like a
>>chackenhawk everytime I fill up my tank and think of young men dying or
>>being injured and many more falling sick from DU poisoning, just to keep
>>gasoline cheap for me. I feel sick that we have to colonize other
>>nations so that Bush's friends can be the ones to profit, instead of
>>letting the market work.
>>
>>
>
>Who was the president when Halliburton got their first big ($2.2B) no-bid
>contract for military logistics? (hint: it wasn't Bush-Sr or Jr)
>
>Pete
>
>
>
Both Kerry and Bush represent the same interests and will perform the
same duties for them. All that differes between the two is personality.

The wars in the ME and Africa will heat up in 2005, and the troop
requirements won't be met by volunteer signups.

Jack Dingler

[Mitch Haley]

"Ken [NY)" wrote:
>
> No, if things got to that point, the US would simply ignore
> the protestations of the caribou and PETA, and drill in Alaska where
> there is plenty of oil.

Does anybody have the numbers?
I read somewhere that it was about 6-8 weeks of current USA consumption.

At any rate, using up what little we have left isn't the way to "reduce
dependence on foreign oil" as some politicians would have us believe.
I'm still opposed to ANY new drilling in USA with import prices below
$100/42 gallons. Keep using up theirs as long as they're willing to
sell it.

Mitch.

[Jack Dingler]

Ken [NY) wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:01:15 GMT, Jack Dingler >
>claims:
>
>
>
>>Ken [NY) wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I'm too old and am a bit crippled up from a car accident. I have good
>>>>days and bad days. Boot camp would probably lay me out for a year. I
>>>>actually did bother to look at enlistment options recently.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I am probably older than you, and actually served in a real
>>>war. But I am weary of seeing you chicken hawks, who never served,
>>>challenging our younger people to go to war. We of my generation for
>>>the most part had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the
>>>military. Some headed for Canada to hide, some future presidents hid
>>>in Europe.
>>> Today however, despite no draft, enlistments and reenlistments
>>>are actually on the increase. So please leave these folks alone. This
>>>younger generation is putting ours to shame.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>On the news they keep saying recruitment is way down. The younger
>>enlistees like National Guardsmen are being reconscripted to keep the
>>numbers up.
>>
>>
>
> The US Defense Department says otherwise, but if you are not
>going to take them at their word, it doesn't matter I suppose.
>
>
>
>>With your experience in the military and policing, I bet they volunteer
>>you, sometime in the next four years. The fact that you once served
>>could legally make you an unwilling volunteer. All it requires is some
>>changes to legislation.
>>
>>
>
> No, I am way over age for the military. I tried looking into
>air marshall service after 9/11, and I was told that I was too old for
>that as well.
>
>
>
>>You see though that you didn't pick up on my sarcasm.
>>
>>
>
> Sorry, but I am such a sarcastic ******* myself, I am not used
>to seeing it in others. So I must have missed it.
>
>
>
>>But technically,
>>buying gasoline does support terrorism and war. I feel like a
>>chackenhawk everytime I fill up my tank and think of young men dying or
>>being injured and many more falling sick from DU poisoning, just to keep
>>gasoline cheap for me. I feel sick that we have to colonize other
>>nations so that Bush's friends can be the ones to profit, instead of
>>letting the market work.
>>
>>Jack Dingler
>>
>>
>
> Look at it this way: the billions of Chinese and other third
>world countries that use bikes to replace the autos they cannot afford
>and cannot produce, are taking up the slack for you. But if the sweet
>feelings of liberal guilt is what floats your boat, go for it.
>
>
>
>
Recently a Dallas resident and Vietnam Vet got called up. He's 57, a
diabetic and suffering from advanced skin cancer. The military wouldn't
take his word or his doctor's word for it. So in a couple of months he
has to report to Florida were an army doctor will examine him and
determine if he's fit for duty. It seems he has skills currently needed.
It made the paper because it's such an extreme case.

I don't know how old you are, but you maybe needed for training and
administrative purposes. You certainly have the skills they need.

Jack Dingler

[Jack Dingler]

Ken [NY) wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:51:30 -0400, Mitch Haley >
>claims:
>
>
>
>>Raoul Duke wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Raoul Duke" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Jym Dyer" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>[I have removed rec.bicycles.rides from the discussion.]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>**** them off really good and they will form an army and
>>>>>>FIGHT YOU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>=v= No, "**** them off" doesn't do it. Keeping oil addicts
>>>>>(and oil profit addicts) from their fix will, though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>By this I presume you mean to somehow prevent people from legally
>>>>
>>>>
>>>purchasing
>>>
>>>
>>>>fuel for their vehicles. How do you propose to do this?
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>I believe that global lack of oil, upsetting the oil importing nations,
>>is what Jym appears to be referring to.
>>
>>Do you remember the oil embargo of 1974? The Saudis acting alone could cause
>>similar problems by cutting their output by half today. The same effect
>>can be achieved simply by waiting for demand to exceed the practical rate
>>of extraction. With demand monotone increasing, and available oil decreasing,
>>it will happen. Judging by the current supply problems, we won't have to
>>wait very long.
>>Mitch.
>>
>>
>
> No, if things got to that point, the US would simply ignore
>the protestations of the caribou and PETA, and drill in Alaska where
>there is plenty of oil.
>
>
>
It depends on the definition of plenty.

The most optimistic projections have it producing about 3 months of US
consumtion, but over a ten year period. Or less than 8% of current
consumption. And that's the top end of the estimates.

Not a number to sneeze at, but I would call it far short of plenty.

The downside is that the Chinese have been begging for a chance to bid
on it. Since it will be transported by tanker, they may be able to
outbid us and take it all.

Jack Dingler

[Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS]

Ken [NY) wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:27:06 -0400, Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
> > claims:
>
>
>>Ken [NY) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Good day. Or as John Kerry would say, Bonjour.
>>>
>>>Ken (NY)
>>
>> Hey, Ken--
>>
>> Can you cite the source of your quotation of Kerry?
>>
>>Steve
>
>
> Which quotation? This one?

No, Ken. The "Bonjour" quote.

Steve


--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

[Zippy the Pinhead]

Having read the bike ngs for awhile, I must take a bit of an issue
with the subject line.

Jym is hypocritical in that he has been known to take people to task
for discussing cycle racing topics in misc, while he himself goes off
topic. There's a lot of political OT stuff on the cycling ngs, I
guess you can expect that with the world being as it is nowadays.
Just going off-topic is not hypocritical, but bawling someone else out
for being OT and then going OT yourself is. If Jym wasn't an OT
poster, nobody would know he's a "leftist".

Now, as to his positions, he's definitely a leftist, and not a stealth
leftist, he's pretty up front with his political leanings, which to me
is the antithesis of hypocrisy.

YMMV.

--
Whiskey for my men,and cheese for my kitties.

[Ruben Safir]

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:14:14 +0000, Jack Dingler wrote:

> I'm too old and am a bit crippled up from a car accident.


Did you hit a Bicycle?

Ruben

[Ruben Safir]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:01:15 +0000, Jack Dingler wrote:

> On the news they keep saying recruitment is way down.


Try reading the real news, but enlistment is up. I know, I tried to
reenlist and the recruiters office was ****PACKED****

Ruben

[Just zis Guy, you know?]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:10:39 -0400, Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
> wrote:

>>> Can you cite the source of your quotation of Kerry?
>> Which quotation? This one?
>No, Ken. The "Bonjour" quote.

I think he's referring to the fact that Kerry is widely travelled and
bilingual, whereas Shrub can barely manage English and at election had
never been outside the USA and Mexico ;-)

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

[Jack Dingler]

Ruben Safir wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:14:14 +0000, Jack Dingler wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'm too old and am a bit crippled up from a car accident.
>>
>>
>
>
>Did you hit a Bicycle?
>
>Ruben
>

Hehe, no. I was hit from behind by a driver that was doing 80 and didn't
see that traffic had stopped.

Jack Dingler

[Jack Dingler]

Ruben Safir wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:01:15 +0000, Jack Dingler wrote:
>
>
>
>>On the news they keep saying recruitment is way down.
>>
>>
>
>
>Try reading the real news, but enlistment is up. I know, I tried to
>reenlist and the recruiters office was ****PACKED****
>
>Ruben
>

Try again. Don't be a quitter.

Jack Dingler

[Jym Dyer]

> = Ken [NY)

> I give Bush credit for being fluent in Spanish.

=v= Which reveals your own command of the language.

=v= If unintentional eloquence can be considered a form of
fluency, I suppose he qualifies for trying to name his oil
business with the Spanish word for "bush" but instead using
the Spanish word for "shrub."
<_Jym_>

[Ruben Safir]

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:40:49 +0000, Jack Dingler wrote:

> Hehe, no. I was hit from behind by a driver that was doing 80 and didn't
> see that traffic had stopped.


I don't believe that. You hita bicyclist

Ruben

[Steven Bornfeld]

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:10:39 -0400, Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
> > wrote:
>
>
>>>> Can you cite the source of your quotation of Kerry?
>>>
>>> Which quotation? This one?
>>
>>No, Ken. The "Bonjour" quote.
>
>
> I think he's referring to the fact that Kerry is widely travelled and
> bilingual, whereas Shrub can barely manage English and at election had
> never been outside the USA and Mexico ;-)
>
> Guy

You're pretty charitable, Guy.
Wrong place, wrong time--hey, wasn't that Dr. (Mack Rebenack) John?

Steve

[Steven Bornfeld]

Ken [NY) wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:10:39 -0400, Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
> > claims:
>
>
>>Ken [NY) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:27:06 -0400, Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
> claims:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ken [NY) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Good day. Or as John Kerry would say, Bonjour.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ken (NY)
>>>>
>>>> Hey, Ken--
>>>>
>>>> Can you cite the source of your quotation of Kerry?
>>>>
>>>>Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> Which quotation? This one?
>>
>>No, Ken. The "Bonjour" quote.
>
>
> That's not a quote, it's giving Kerry credit for being fluent
> in a second language. Like I give Bush credit for being fluent in
> Spanish.
>
> "Today, Kerry speaks fluent French, decent Spanish and smatterings of
> Latin, Italian, German and Vietnamese. He has relatives in France and
> England."


Why, thank you, Ken!
A bientot,
Steve

> http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-26-kerry-world-view_x.htm
>
>
>
>
> Good morning. Or as John Kerry would say, Bonjour.
>
> Ken (NY)
>
> "I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when
> the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact
> that we did disarm him."
> --John F. Kerry (ABC News, 5/4/03)
>
> "I thought that John Kerry’s statement in his announcement
> address, that he voted for the resolution just to threaten
> Saddam Hussein, was unbelievable. It was clearly an authorization
> for President Bush to use force against Saddam. We don’t
> need a waffler in charge of our country’s future."
> --Senator Joe Lieberman
>
> email:
> http://www.geocities.com/bluesguy68/email.htm
>
> spammers can send mail to