Re: Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking

[reader]

Mike Vandeman wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:17:58 GMT, SMS > wrote:

>
> Nope, NONE of the experts believe that BS. Only mountain bikers, who are too
> LAZY to actually READ the research. No one who's actually READ it can still
> believe that horsepucky.
>

> ===
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Prove it... show some reasearch on lazyness... are you too lazy?

[Mike Vandeman]

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:49:18 -0400, reader > wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:17:58 GMT, SMS > wrote:
..
..>
..> Nope, NONE of the experts believe that BS. Only mountain bikers, who are too
..> LAZY to actually READ the research. No one who's actually READ it can still
..> believe that horsepucky.
..>
..
..> ===
..> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
..> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
..> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
..>
..> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
..
..Prove it... show some reasearch on lazyness... are you too lazy?

No, I read all of them. AND wrote a review of the literature. None of you are
willing to do that. Of course, you would have to learn to READ, first.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

[Mark]

"Mike Vandeman" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:49:18 -0400, reader > wrote:
>
> .Mike Vandeman wrote:
> .> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:17:58 GMT, SMS >
> wrote:
> .
> .>
> .> Nope, NONE of the experts believe that BS. Only mountain bikers, who
> are too
> .> LAZY to actually READ the research. No one who's actually READ it can
> still
> .> believe that horsepucky.
> .>

> .Prove it... show some reasearch on lazyness... are you too lazy?
>
> No, I read all of them. AND wrote a review of the literature. None of you
> are
> willing to do that. Of course, you would have to learn to READ, first.
definition of 'all' please? That means your search and inclusion criteria.

Just to prove you a liar again, google, search field 'hiking and mountain
biking, ecological comparison'

Search result 66000 hits.

You havent read it all liar.

[Gary S.]

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 00:29:55 GMT, Mike Vandeman >
wrote:

>Conveniently, you aren't able to actually NAME even ONE of those "experts".
>
Conveniently, you aren't able to actually NAME even ONE of your
supporters, or any "expert" who agrees with YOU.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
--
At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom