Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike in roadrage attack'
 

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
inches from being “paralysed� after being knocked off his bicycle and
run over by a motorist in a “road rage� attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html
--
Bod

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike inroad rage attack'
 

On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
inches from being “paralysed� after being knocked off his bicycle and
run over by a motorist in a “road rage� attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html

QUOTE:
the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool Street
Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly, causing
him to go into the back of the car.
ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to stop,
consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt causing
damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his OWN
version.

QUOTE:
Mr Gilligan went to “politely� remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he intends
to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged stationary
vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

QUOTE:
“He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle off...
ENDQUOTE

....thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

Nice man.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike inroad rage attack'
 

On 13/04/2018 10:47, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
inches from being “paralysed� after being knocked off his bicycle and
run over by a motorist in a “road rage� attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html


QUOTE:
the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool Street
Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly, causing
him to go into the back of the car.
ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to stop,
consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt causing
damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his OWN
version.

QUOTE:
Mr GilliganÂ* went to “politelyâ€� remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he intends
to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged stationary
vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

QUOTE:
“He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle off...
ENDQUOTE

...thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

Nice man.


Only a cyclist could be that stupid and law evading, and still think
that they are in the right.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike in road rage attack'
 

MrCheerful wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:47, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
inches from being "paralysed" after being knocked off his bicycle
and run over by a motorist in a "road rage" attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html


QUOTE:
the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool Street
Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly,
causing him to go into the back of the car.
ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to
stop, consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt
causing damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his
OWN version.

QUOTE:
Mr Gilligan went to "politely" remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he
intends to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged
stationary vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

QUOTE:
"He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle off...
ENDQUOTE

...thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

Nice man.


Only a cyclist could be that stupid and law evading, and still think
that they are in the right.

+1

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike inroad rage attack'
 

On 13/04/18 10:47, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
inches from being “paralysed� after being knocked off his bicycle
and run over by a motorist in a “road rage� attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html

QUOTE: the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool
Street Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly,
causing him to go into the back of the car. ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to
stop, consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt
causing damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his
OWN version.

QUOTE: Mr Gilligan went to “politely� remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he
intends to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged
stationary vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

There are circumstances where the driver could be at fault -

QUOTE:
He said: “I have tyre marks on my shoes..."
ENDQUOTE

- which makes it a possibility. I hope it was on camera.

QUOTE: “He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle
off... ENDQUOTE

...thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

It is not a requirement to stop at the scene (I am surprised you didn't
know). If you were injured in a crash you're welcome to hang around for
the possibility of getting a fist in your face on top of it all.

After such a public announcement, the driver, if he believes himself to
be innocent, only has to turn up at a police station and ask for Andrew
Gilligan.

QUOTE:
A spokeswoman for City Police said: “We can confirm a 27-year old man
from Camden was arrested..."
ENDQUOTE

So they appear to know something about the event. I wonder which one was
first to get to a police station.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike in road rage attack'
 

TMS320 wrote:
On 13/04/18 10:47, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
inches from being "paralysed" after being knocked off his bicycle
and run over by a motorist in a "road rage" attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html

QUOTE: the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool
Street Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly,
causing him to go into the back of the car. ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to
stop, consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt
causing damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his
OWN version.

QUOTE: Mr Gilligan went to "politely" remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he
intends to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged
stationary vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

There are circumstances where the driver could be at fault -

QUOTE:
He said: "I have tyre marks on my shoes..."
ENDQUOTE

- which makes it a possibility. I hope it was on camera.

QUOTE: "He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle
off... ENDQUOTE

...thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

It is not a requirement to stop at the scene (I am surprised you
didn't know). If you were injured in a crash you're welcome to hang
around for the possibility of getting a fist in your face on top of
it all.
After such a public announcement, the driver, if he believes himself
to be innocent, only has to turn up at a police station and ask for
Andrew Gilligan.

QUOTE:
A spokeswoman for City Police said: "We can confirm a 27-year old man
from Camden was arrested..."
ENDQUOTE

So they appear to know something about the event. I wonder which one
was first to get to a police station.

From another group:
"Cyclists make pheasants look intelligent".

Can't argue with that.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike inroad rage attack'
 

On 13/04/18 19:14, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

From another group:
"Cyclists make pheasants look intelligent".

Can't argue with that.

You and Cheerless have no trouble making cyclists look intelligent.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike in road rage attack'
 

On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:28:01 GMT, TMS320 wrote:

On 13/04/18 19:14, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

From another group:
"Cyclists make pheasants look intelligent".

Can't argue with that.

You and Cheerless have no trouble making cyclists look intelligent.


Whatever happened to the Judith cycle-hater? Maybe it gets more mileage
from the legal NG.

--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike inroad rage attack'
 

On 13/04/2018 18:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/04/18 10:47, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
Â*inches from being “paralysedâ€� after being knocked off his bicycle
and run over by a motorist in a “road rage� attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html


QUOTE: the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool
Street Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly,
causing him to go into the back of the car. ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to
stop, consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt
causing damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his
OWN version.

QUOTE: Mr GilliganÂ* went to “politelyâ€� remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he
intends to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged
stationary vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

There are circumstances where the driver could be at fault -

QUOTE:
He said: “I have tyre marks on my shoes..."
ENDQUOTE

- which makes it a possibility. I hope it was on camera.

QUOTE: “He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle
off... ENDQUOTE

...thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
Â*the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

It is not a requirement to stop at the scene (I am surprised you didn't
know). If you were injured in a crash you're welcome to hang around for
the possibility of getting a fist in your face on top of it all.

After such a public announcement, the driver, if he believes himself to
be innocent, only has to turn up at a police station and ask for Andrew
Gilligan.

QUOTE:
A spokeswoman for City Police said: “We can confirm a 27-year old man
from Camden was arrested..."
ENDQUOTE

So they appear to know something about the event. I wonder which one was
first to get to a police station.

So the operator of the vehicle which crashes into the rear of the
vehicle in front is in the right, according to TMS.

As long as the vehicle doing the crashing is a bike and the one being
crashed into is a car, in any othr case case it's the other way round.

Ex-London cycling czar Andrew Gilligan 'rammed off his bike inroad rage attack'
 

On 13/04/18 22:10, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 18:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/04/18 10:47, JNugent wrote:
On 13/04/2018 10:21, Bod wrote:

London's former cycling czar Andrew Gilligan told today how he was
Â*inches from being “paralysedâ€� after being knocked off his bicycle
and run over by a motorist in a “road rage� attack.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...-a3813001.html


QUOTE: the journalist was cycling along Bishopsgate outside Liverpool
Street Station. He said a black SUV in front of him stopped suddenly,
causing him to go into the back of the car. ENDQUOTE

He means that he wasn't watching where he was going and failed to
stop, consequently colliding with a stationary vehicle and no doubt
causing damage..

That sounds like his fault rather than anyone else's - and it's his
OWN version.

QUOTE: Mr GilliganÂ* went to “politelyâ€� remonstrate with the driver
ENDQUOTE

What?

He collides with another vehicle due to his own failings and he
intends to "remonstrate" with the person in the (no doubt) damaged
stationary vehicle who was not at fault?

What planet is this "Bishopsgate" place on?

There are circumstances where the driver could be at fault -

QUOTE:
He said: “I have tyre marks on my shoes..."
ENDQUOTE

- which makes it a possibility. I hope it was on camera.

QUOTE: “He looked rather threatening so I thought I should cycle
off... ENDQUOTE

...thereby leaving the scene of the incident and denying the owner of
Â*the damaged vehicle any chance of recovering the cost of repairs.

It is not a requirement to stop at the scene (I am surprised you
didn't know). If you were injured in a crash you're welcome to hang
around for the possibility of getting a fist in your face on top of it
all.

After such a public announcement, the driver, if he believes himself
to be innocent, only has to turn up at a police station and ask for
Andrew Gilligan.

QUOTE:
A spokeswoman for City Police said: “We can confirm a 27-year old man
from Camden was arrested..."
ENDQUOTE

So they appear to know something about the event. I wonder which one
was first to get to a police station.

So the operator of the vehicle which crashes into the rear of the
vehicle in front is in the right, according to TMS.

Nugent fails comprehension. It's rather a habit you have.

As long as the vehicle doing the crashing is a bike and the one being
crashed into is a car, in any othr case case it's the other way round.

You said it. Not mant people will agree with you.