Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.
Why don't you tell us what you 'think' they contain.

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:23:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64..img..1.13.875.0..0j35i 39k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27Zd TyM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.


I have better things to do.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

So you claim.
Anyone can invent a URL.

Why are you so reluctant to tell us what is in your links?

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On 23/05/2017 19:14, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:23:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.


I have better things to do.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

So you claim.
Anyone can invent a URL.

But no-one could invent a URL which could not be checked by clicking on it.

And those URLs are what they purport to be.

Why are you so reluctant to tell us what is in your links?

The links themselves tell you that (and this is the third time you've
been advised of that).

Look at the tell-tale bits of the links:

1: rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity

2: cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter

3. [non-specific, but a link to bikeradar.com]

4: trash-talk-racing-waste

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 1:09:25 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2017 19:14, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:23:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.


I have better things to do.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=e...Ox6y27ZdT yM:

What language is that in? Gobbledegook?



So you claim.
Anyone can invent a URL.

But no-one could invent a URL which could not be checked by clicking on it.

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On 28/05/2017 02:06, wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 1:09:25 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2017 19:14, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:23:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.


I have better things to do.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=e...Ox6y27ZdT yM:

What language is that in? Gobbledegook?

I believe it is what is known as a URL (Unique Resource Locator).

I am no expert on distributed computing, but why am I not surprised that
you know absolutely nothing about it?

So you claim.
Anyone can invent a URL.

But no-one could invent a URL which could not be checked by clicking on it.

Why should I do your work for you?

What "work" do you mean?

And those URLs are what they purport to be.

Why are you so reluctant to tell us what is in your links?

The links themselves tell you that (and this is the third time you've
been advised of that).

Look at the tell-tale bits of the links:

1: rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity

2: cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter

3. [non-specific, but a link to bikeradar.com]

4: trash-talk-racing-waste

London Marathon

Eh?

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 11:56:21 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 28/05/2017 02:06, wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 1:09:25 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2017 19:14, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:23:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.


I have better things to do.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=e...Ox6y27ZdT yM:

What language is that in? Gobbledegook?

I believe it is what is known as a URL (Unique Resource Locator).

Actually it's UNIFORM resource Locator.


I am no expert on distributed computing, but why am I not surprised that
you know absolutely nothing about it?

W^5


So you claim.
Anyone can invent a URL.

But no-one could invent a URL which could not be checked by clicking on it.

Why should I do your work for you?

What "work" do you mean?

Explaining what is in your links.


And those URLs are what they purport to be.

Why are you so reluctant to tell us what is in your links?

The links themselves tell you that (and this is the third time you've
been advised of that).

Look at the tell-tale bits of the links:

1: rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity

2: cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter

3. [non-specific, but a link to bikeradar.com]

4: trash-talk-racing-waste

London Marathon

Eh?

You are talking about organised events open to the public where litter is inevitable.
I was talking about everyday travel.

Littering cyclists are their own worst enemy
 

On 29/05/2017 02:24, wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 11:56:21 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 28/05/2017 02:06, wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 1:09:25 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2017 19:14, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:23:56 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 19:32, wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 7:09:01 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2017 18:49, wrote:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e...t-spring-clean

It cost the taxpayer £6million to clear up the litter dropped by cyclists on our motorway network last year.
No wonder there is no money for proper cycle paths.

Something needs to be done.

Shoot littering cyclists?

Harsh, but fair, some might think, but you are right; it's a problem
that needs to be addressed.

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/latest-news/rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity-195235

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=192 0&bih=950&q=cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter &gs_l=img.3...860.3905.0.4369.18.18.0.0.0.0.107.11 30.16j1.17.0....0...1.1.64.img..1.13.875.0..0j35i3 9k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.p2yH81tok3g#imgrc=3SzOx6y27ZdT yM:

http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12630267

http://inrng.com/2013/02/trash-talk-racing-waste/

Mind you, the drivers who chuck cigarette packets, matches and other
trash out of vehicle windows are just as bad: honorary cyclists, as you
imply.

I am not going to bother clicking on those links.

You don't have to if you don't want to.


I have better things to do.

They are links direct to images and simply reading the URL (in each
case) will tell you all you need to know).

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=e...Ox6y27ZdT yM:

What language is that in? Gobbledegook?

I believe it is what is known as a URL (Unique Resource Locator).

Actually it's UNIFORM resource Locator.


I am no expert on distributed computing, but why am I not surprised that
you know absolutely nothing about it?

W^5


So you claim.
Anyone can invent a URL.

But no-one could invent a URL which could not be checked by clicking on it.

Why should I do your work for you?

What "work" do you mean?

Explaining what is in your links.


And those URLs are what they purport to be.

Why are you so reluctant to tell us what is in your links?

The links themselves tell you that (and this is the third time you've
been advised of that).

Look at the tell-tale bits of the links:

1: rider-rubbish-is-becoming-a-sad-by-product-of-cyclings-popularity

2: cycle+race+litter&oq=cycle+race+litter

3. [non-specific, but a link to bikeradar.com]

4: trash-talk-racing-waste

London Marathon

Eh?

You are talking about organised events open to the public where litter is inevitable.
I was talking about everyday travel.

Littering is never acceptable.

It's an offence.

Cyclists: take your rubbish home where it probably won't look out of place.