Police hunt rapist on a bike
|
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-47939192 So, 'Woman cyclist raped by pedestrian' would be more acurate. More proof pedestrians need number plates. |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 15/04/2019 22:03, Simon Jester wrote:
On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-47939192 So, 'Woman cyclist raped by pedestrian' would be more acurate. How? The headline is: "Woman raped in Peterborough by passing cyclist". More proof pedestrians need number plates. |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 16/04/2019 03:14, JNugent wrote:
On 15/04/2019 22:03, Simon Jester wrote: On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-47939192 So, 'Woman cyclist raped by pedestrian' would be more acurate. How? The headline is: "Woman raped in Peterborough by passing cyclist". It does but is plainly wrong unless you can describe a way that makes "rape by passing cyclist" technically possible. |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 16/04/2019 08:45, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/04/2019 03:14, JNugent wrote: On 15/04/2019 22:03, Simon Jester wrote On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-47939192 So, 'Woman cyclist raped by pedestrian' would be more acurate. How? The headline is: "Woman raped in Peterborough by passing cyclist". It does but is plainly wrong unless you can describe a way that makes "rape by passing cyclist" technically possible. In what way is it not possible? Unless his bike, his cycling and the fact that he is a cyclist is - in your view at least, and that of Jester - irrelevant, whilst the fact that the rapist cyclist's victim is a cyclist is not irrelevant? Got it. You might both want to think about honing your skills in logic. In the meantime, let's all hope that this cyclist pedestrian / airline pilot / rich man (Considerably Richer than Yow at least, because he's a cyclist) is caught and brought to justice. Given a charge like that, he's probably best off heading straight for the Ecuadorean Embassy, wouldn't you say? |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 16/04/2019 11:35, JNugent wrote:
On 16/04/2019 08:45, TMS320 wrote: On 16/04/2019 03:14, JNugent wrote: On 15/04/2019 22:03, Simon Jester wrote On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 9:05:11 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-47939192 So, 'Woman cyclist raped by pedestrian' would be more acurate. How? The headline is: "Woman raped in Peterborough by passing cyclist". It does but is plainly wrong unless you can describe a way that makes "rape by passing cyclist" technically possible. In what way is it not possible? I was asking you to suggest how it could be technically possible. It's possible, perhaps, to perform the act while cycling but I have little doubt that it would require the lady concerned to be cooperative. Let's just say that I won't be searching out dodgy sites to find examples. If you disagree with the analysis, perhaps you have? Unless his bike, his cycling and the fact that he is a cyclist is - in your view at least, and that of Jester - irrelevant, whilst the fact that the rapist cyclist's victim is a cyclist is not irrelevant? Got it. You might both want to think about honing your skills in logic. That retort usually follows a lack of ability on your part. In the meantime, let's all hope that this person is caught and brought to justice. I have corrected your sentence. |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 11:35:02 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
In what way is it not possible? Clearly you have never had sex if you think it is possible for a man to rape a woman whilst both are mounted on moving bicycles. Unless his bike, his cycling and the fact that he is a cyclist is - in your view at least, and that of Jester - irrelevant, whilst the fact that the rapist cyclist's victim is a cyclist is not irrelevant? Got it. You might both want to think about honing your skills in logic. If I drive through a red traffic light in my car, which class of road users has broken the law? A: Pedestrian B: Cyclist C: Motorist D: Train Passenger E: Golfer |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 16/04/2019 17:50, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 11:35:02 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: In what way is it not possible? Clearly you have never had sex if you think it is possible for a man to rape a woman whilst both are mounted on moving bicycles. If you insist that it is impossible for a cyclist to have sex, be careful: I might accept your assertion. Unless his bike, his cycling and the fact that he is a cyclist is - in your view at least, and that of Jester - irrelevant, whilst the fact that the rapist cyclist's victim is a cyclist is not irrelevant? Got it. You might both want to think about honing your skills in logic. If I drive through a red traffic light in my car, which class of road users has broken the law? A: Pedestrian B: Cyclist C: Motorist D: Train Passenger E: Golfer |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 16/04/2019 17:50, Simon Jester wrote:
If I drive through a red traffic light in my car, which class of road users has broken the law? A: Pedestrian B: Cyclist C: Motorist D: Train Passenger E: Golfer No mention of motorists he- https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/re...ading-15980797 "The 20-year-old man was walking in Blenheim Road when three offenders got out of a car parked at the side of the road and walked towards him." https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/re...t-run-15995656 "The 35-year-old man, from Staines, died at the scene after he was involved in a collision with a vehicle... Officers believe the vehicle failed to stop..." |
Police hunt rapist on a bike
On 16/04/2019 19:36, JNugent wrote:
On 16/04/2019 17:50, Simon Jester wrote: On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 11:35:02 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: In what way is it not possible? Clearly you have never had sex if you think it is possible for a man to rape a woman whilst both are mounted on moving bicycles. If you insist that it is impossible for a cyclist to have sex, be careful: I might accept your assertion. Unless his bike, his cycling and the fact that he is a cyclist is - in your view at least, and that of Jester - irrelevant, whilst the fact that the rapist cyclist's victim is a cyclist is not irrelevant? Got it. You might both want to think about honing your skills in logic. If I drive through a red traffic light in my car, which class of road users has broken the law? A: Pedestrian B: Cyclist C: Motorist D: Train Passenger E: Golfer The rapist arrived and made off on a bike, and the victim is a cyclist. I realise these things are difficult for any cyclist to understand, but that makes them both cyclists in the minds of any normal human being, oh, wait a minute...I see the problem. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com