Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway.
|
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:20:28 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. What the **** do you care about legal requirements? You don't even stick to speed limits! |
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
In article , sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "****sack Moishe Goldbergsky") wrote: What the **** do you care about legal requirements? Sigh. Look, you dirty, inferior sub-louse... I have, repeatedly, ordered you to be polite to humans. Please follow. |
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
|
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?* They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the 21st century. |
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:37:49 +0100, Tosspot wrote:
On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote: Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the 21st century. So your wipers magically remove the spray that's metres in front of you? Idiot. |
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:50:47 +0100, pensive hamster wrote:
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 20:37:50 UTC+1, Tosspot wrote: On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote: Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the 21st century. It seems a reasonable question. There are some Spray Suppression requirements for lorries: https://www.gov.uk/government/public...t-a-pass#spray They make up all sorts of stupid rules for cars but neglect the obvious. You only need to drive once on a motorway in the pouring rain to see the mess made by cars without flaps. |
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 21:02:11 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:50:47 +0100, pensive hamster wrote: On Saturday, 27 April 2019 20:37:50 UTC+1, Tosspot wrote: On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote: Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the 21st century. It seems a reasonable question. There are some Spray Suppression requirements for lorries: https://www.gov.uk/government/public...t-a-pass#spray They make up all sorts of stupid rules for cars but neglect the obvious. You only need to drive once on a motorway in the pouring rain to see the mess made by cars without flaps. You neglect the obvious laws such as speeding/tailgating/drunk-driving and you're banging on about stupid rules for mudflaps??? Hint: if you're getting sprayed by the car in front, you're too ****ing close (see under 'tailgating' above). |
Why is sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron now forging as "NEMO"? ( Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?)
In article , sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (forging as "NEMO") wrote: [flush] Forging those superior to you? But you are STILL inferior, Andrzej. You will ALWAYS be inferior. It's genetic. |
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
In article , sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "****sack Moishe Goldbergsky") wrote: You neglect You're neglecting my direct order not to contradict HUMANS, you silly inferior sub-louse. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com