Dr. Thompson I presume
 

In the better med schools they teach this method of creating patients.

http://velonews.com/article/99513

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

On Oct 30, 8:28*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
In the better med schools they teach this method of creating patients.

http://velonews.com/article/99513

http://velonews.com/article/99685/la...uments-wrap-up

I hope the good doctor gets his asshole reamed in prison on a daily
basis.

R

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

On Oct 30, 7:18*pm, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:28*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

In the better med schools they teach this method of creating patients.

http://velonews.com/article/99513

http://velonews.com/article/99685/la...osing-argument...

I hope the good doctor gets his asshole reamed in prison on a daily
basis.

It's hard to know exactly how accurate, complete and/or biased the
reporting is, but from what I've read, I hope the jury gets the same
impression that I have and the dear doctor hangs.

I've been in a situation where an angry driver pulled in front of a
paceline and hit the brakes. We had no serious consequences but it
quickly became apparent how that act simple act is anything but
innocent and could easily end up being deadly.

DR

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

DirtRoadie wrote:

On Oct 30, 7:18*pm, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:28*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

In the better med schools they teach this method of creating patients.

http://velonews.com/article/99513

http://velonews.com/article/99685/la...osing-argument...

I hope the good doctor gets his asshole reamed in prison on a daily
basis.

It's hard to know exactly how accurate, complete and/or biased the
reporting is, but from what I've read, I hope the jury gets the same
impression that I have and the dear doctor hangs.

I've been in a situation where an angry driver pulled in front of a
paceline and hit the brakes. We had no serious consequences but it
quickly became apparent how that act simple act is anything but
innocent and could easily end up being deadly.

DR

The cyclists deserved what they got.

First of all, how come they couldn't stop their bikes in time? A bike can
stop faster than a car.

Second, when a car is behind you trying to get around you, you don't ride
2-abreast and hold up the car....and then flip the driver off when he passes
you.

If you're driving a car and you hit the rear of someone's car, it's your
fault. I don't see why riding a bike makes it any different.

Thanks,

Magilla

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

On Oct 31, 11:30*am, MagillaGorilla wrote:
First of all, how come they couldn't stop their bikes in time? *A bike can
stop faster than a car.

Wrong.

Brad Anders

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

"Paul B. Anders" wrote:

On Oct 31, 11:30*am, MagillaGorilla wrote:
First of all, how come they couldn't stop their bikes in time? *A bike can
stop faster than a car.

Wrong.

Brad Anders

A bike can stop quicker. However, these guys obviously weren't talented enough
and didn't have the reactions to do it. They were evidently too busy acting
arrogant and flipping off a law-abiding driver who wanted to go to work.

And they kissed the back of the car because they were not in control of their
bikes. I bet you they won't be giving the finger to drivers in the
future...especially that smart-ass with the dead nose.

You SoCal riders got a little beatdown that day. And there's more where that
came from unless you start riding single file.

Thanks,

Magilla

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

On Oct 31, 2:30*pm, MagillaGorilla wrote:
DirtRoadie wrote:
On Oct 30, 7:18*pm, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:28*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

In the better med schools they teach this method of creating patients.

http://velonews.com/article/99513

http://velonews.com/article/99685/la...osing-argument....

I hope the good doctor gets his asshole reamed in prison on a daily
basis.

It's hard to know exactly how accurate, complete and/or biased the
reporting is, but from what I've read, I hope the jury gets the same
impression that I have and the dear doctor hangs.

I've been in a situation where an angry driver pulled in front of a
paceline and hit the brakes. We had no serious consequences but it
quickly became apparent how that act simple act is anything but
innocent and could easily end up being deadly.

The cyclists deserved what they got.

First of all, how come they couldn't stop their bikes in time? *A bike can
stop faster than a car.

Where exactly does reaction time enter into your non-existent math
skills analysis? Does expectation play any part in reaction time?

Second, when a car is behind you trying to get around you, you don't ride
2-abreast and hold up the car....and then flip the driver off when he passes
you.

If you're driving a car and you hit the rear of someone's car, it's your
fault. *I don't see why riding a bike makes it any different.

You don't see many things. Do you agree with the assessment of the
defense douchebag that a bike is inherently stable (at any speed (with
apologies to Ralph "Magilla is a twit" Nader)?

If you weren't so cuddly I'd call you a twit, and Nader already did.

R

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

"Paul B. Anders" wrote in message
...
On Oct 31, 11:30 am, MagillaGorilla wrote:
First of all, how come they couldn't stop their bikes in time? A bike
can
stop faster than a car.

Wrong.

He demonstrates an almost complete lack of knowledge of the stopping power
of a bike. And for those others who aren't aware and don't want to look like
the fool that MG is - a bicycle can stop roughly half as fast as an
automobile because if you stop faster than about a half gee you roll over
the front wheel. A bicycle's center of gravity is too high for rapid stops.

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

RicodJour wrote:

On Oct 31, 2:30*pm, MagillaGorilla wrote:
DirtRoadie wrote:
On Oct 30, 7:18*pm, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:28*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

In the better med schools they teach this method of creating patients.

http://velonews.com/article/99513

http://velonews.com/article/99685/la...osing-argument...

I hope the good doctor gets his asshole reamed in prison on a daily
basis.

It's hard to know exactly how accurate, complete and/or biased the
reporting is, but from what I've read, I hope the jury gets the same
impression that I have and the dear doctor hangs.

I've been in a situation where an angry driver pulled in front of a
paceline and hit the brakes. We had no serious consequences but it
quickly became apparent how that act simple act is anything but
innocent and could easily end up being deadly.

The cyclists deserved what they got.

First of all, how come they couldn't stop their bikes in time? *A bike can
stop faster than a car.

Where exactly does reaction time enter into your non-existent math
skills analysis? Does expectation play any part in reaction time?

Of course it does. The person behind is always suppose to expect it. It's
called being attentive.



Second, when a car is behind you trying to get around you, you don't ride
2-abreast and hold up the car....and then flip the driver off when he passes
you.

If you're driving a car and you hit the rear of someone's car, it's your
fault. *I don't see why riding a bike makes it any different.

You don't see many things. Do you agree with the assessment of the
defense douchebag that a bike is inherently stable (at any speed (with
apologies to Ralph "Magilla is a twit" Nader)?

Yes, I agree that a bike is stable.


Thanks,

Magilla

Dr. Thompson I presume
 

On Oct 31, 12:30*pm, MagillaGorilla wrote:


If you're driving a car and you hit the rear of someone's car, it's your
fault. *I don't see why riding a bike makes it any different.

I'll have to remember that. So that I can pull in front of somebody,
slam on my brakes and then collect big bucks from their insurance
company when they hit me. I'll tell them its the "Magilla Rule." No
exceptions, and recognized in most jurisdictions right?
C'mon, your trolling skills are weak if not non-existent.
Let's see what the jury says.
DR