a third of a million less road lice !!
 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z

A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the irony.

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z

A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will
reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the
irony.

You are obviously too stupid to understand that the vast majority of drivers
and pedestrians detest cycling scum and could not give a flying **** about
their safety.
Have you always been stupid?

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...home-pkq778j6z

A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will
reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the
irony.

You are obviously too stupid to understand that the vast majority of drivers
and pedestrians detest cycling scum and could not give a flying **** about
their safety.

I am smart enough to understand that if people are too afraid to cycle they will drive and cause more congestion.

Have you always been stupid?

What metric do you use to measure stupidity?

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:18:43 GMT, Simon Jester
wrote:

On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 3:58:11 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 11:37:49 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...-the-road-for-
safer-ride-at-home-pkq778j6z

A third of a million more cars on the roads. At least that will
reduce traffic speeds and make the roads safer for cyclists. Oh the
irony.

You are obviously too stupid to understand that the vast majority of
drivers and pedestrians detest cycling scum and could not give a
flying **** about their safety.

Do you really feel this way? I sense much anger in this one. Stop reading
the Daily Mail immediately and take up a relaxing hobby. Stamp collecting
might suit you.


I am smart enough to understand that if people are too afraid to cycle
they will drive and cause more congestion.

Have you always been stupid?

What metric do you use to measure stupidity?


He has his own benchmark.


--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:01:43 -0000 (UTC)
"Kerr-Mudd,John" wrote:

He has his own benchmark.

So one Pounder is thick, two Pounders is as dim as Nugent and half a
Pounder is average IQ, while zero Pounders is someone who's never done
anything stupid ever. Does that sound about right?

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 8:53:46 PM UTC+1, Rob Morley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:01:43 -0000 (UTC)
"Kerr-Mudd,John" wrote:

He has his own benchmark.

So one Pounder is thick, two Pounders is as dim as Nugent and half a
Pounder is average IQ, while zero Pounders is someone who's never done
anything stupid ever. Does that sound about right?

Wouldn't that mean Mr Pounder scores 10 on the Pounder scale?

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

Rob Morley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:01:43 -0000 (UTC)
"Kerr-Mudd,John" wrote:

He has his own benchmark.

So one Pounder is thick, two Pounders is as dim as Nugent and half a
Pounder is average IQ, while zero Pounders is someone who's never done
anything stupid ever. Does that sound about right?

And I thought that I'd heard all of the Pounder jokes.

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 8:53:46 PM UTC+1, Rob Morley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:01:43 -0000 (UTC)
"Kerr-Mudd,John" wrote:

He has his own benchmark.

So one Pounder is thick, two Pounders is as dim as Nugent and half a
Pounder is average IQ, while zero Pounders is someone who's never
done anything stupid ever. Does that sound about right?

Wouldn't that mean Mr Pounder scores 10 on the Pounder scale?

I post in my own name, you have not got the guts to do that.
But you are a spineless cyclist and that is all you ever will be.

a third of a million less road lice !!
 

On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Simon Jester wrote:

On Sunday, April 21, 2019 at 8:53:46 PM UTC+1, Rob Morley wrote:

So one Pounder is thick, two Pounders is as dim as Nugent and half a
Pounder is average IQ, while zero Pounders is someone who's never
done anything stupid ever. Does that sound about right?

Wouldn't that mean Mr Pounder scores 10 on the Pounder scale?

No he's the definitive measure, like the master kilogram that they keep
in Paris (although that is very soon to be replaced by a definition in
terms of the Planck constant).