TK was exactly right. OT
While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him,
with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was right on the money. Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. more there Bill C |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C wrote:
While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was right on the money. Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R |
TK was exactly right. OT
"RicodJour" wrote in message
... | On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C wrote: | While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, | with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was | right on the money. | Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being | mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. | | http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p | | New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive | Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis | Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 | Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally | rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a | government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a | "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which | has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. | | That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way | saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human | activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why | you're awarding the medal... | | R Agreed. Biofuels, when not derived from waste product, are an abomination and an insult to humanity. The idea that it's more important to feed our cars than our mouths... what could be more absurd? And not only do the economics not work out, but it's tough to show that you're actually gaining energy too, after you factor in everything that goes into growing crops. But as you say, what does this have to do with awarding points to TK? His attitude is simply that global warming itself is a myth. The only reason he'd care about biofuels is if it puts cheaper gas into his tank. Not that there's anything wrong with that concept, to a point. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 9:47*am, RicodJour wrote:
That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate discussion. Just about everyone insisted that biofuels had no, or negligible impact on worldwide food resources. So much for my troll index with the first troll in ages. Bill C |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 10:23*am, Bill C wrote:
On Jun 19, 9:47*am, RicodJour wrote: That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate discussion. snip Dumbass - You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be less corn for food. Duh. And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 2:42 pm, Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
On Jun 19, 10:23 am, Bill C wrote: On Jun 19, 9:47 am, RicodJour wrote: That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate discussion. You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be less corn for food. Duh. And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. You're getting soft in your old age. I don't support corn based corn subsidies, corn fed beef, beef fed beef and lots of other it-seemed- like-a-good-idea-at-the-time idiocies. R |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 11:42*am, Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. You don't have a choice but to support them. I support afternoon training rides, but not willingly. |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 11:54*am, RicodJour wrote:
On Jun 19, 2:42 pm, Kurgan Gringioni wrote: On Jun 19, 10:23 am, Bill C wrote: On Jun 19, 9:47 am, RicodJour wrote: That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate discussion. You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be less corn for food. Duh. And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. You're getting soft in your old age. *I don't support corn based corn subsidies, corn fed beef, beef fed beef and lots of other it-seemed- like-a-good-idea-at-the-time idiocies. Could I get you to support killing piggies and destroying crops? Such policies grow the middle class. Could I get you to support "old"-age retirement benefits? You know, if less people are producing, then more will be produced. That will grow the middle class. Less is more, you know. "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength." --- George Orwell, "1984" |
TK was exactly right. OT
On Jun 19, 6:47*am, RicodJour wrote:
That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. * It was made light of. |
TK was exactly right. OT
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
"War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength." --- George Orwell, "1984" "Cadence is a red herring." --- Benjamin Franklin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com