God fixes stupidity
 

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians
only, wouldn't you say?

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians
only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. (The
answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:

On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that
sort of outcome")?

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply
obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that
sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it.

(If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply
obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we
didn't have lots of stupid motorists.

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that
sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it.

(If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd
simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we
didn't have lots of stupid motorists.

What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?

God fixes stupidity
 

On 29/05/18 22:36, MrCheerful wrote:
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

What collision?
Certainly not another vehicle.

God fixes stupidity
 

On 30/05/2018 10:24, Peter Keller wrote:

On 29/05/18 22:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

What collision?
Certainly not another vehicle.

With the wall? The ground? One of those steps?

God fixes stupidity
 

On 30/05/2018 12:46, JNugent wrote:
On 30/05/2018 10:24, Peter Keller wrote:

On 29/05/18 22:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

What collision?
Certainly not another vehicle.

With the wall? The ground? One of those steps?

Ok, which one did he collide with?

--
Bod