‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

Cyclists are the new women.
An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Some valid points about Clerkenwell Road, which seems to be a magnet for bad cyclists, obscured by the total ******** that makes up most of the article.

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 20:04:49 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

Cyclists are the new women.
An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Was that our resident hagfish photographed at the end of the article?

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 20:04:49 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

Cyclists are the new women.
An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Was that our resident hagfish photographed at the end of the article?

Don't think so, I think it's a psycholists's ********, complete with zits.

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Joke poster cites joke "newspaper"

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:08:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Joke poster cites joke "newspaper"

This story has more credence:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/429...-investigation

?Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.?
 

In article ,
Bertie Wooster wrote:

On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:08:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...cious-moaning-
tetchy--cyclists-new-women.html

Joke poster cites joke "newspaper"

This story has more credence:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/429...red-to-kill-Pr
incess-Diana-ups-pressure-for-murder-investigation

As does this ..

http://weeklyworldnews.com/celebs/95...ted-with-elvis
/

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On 16/09/2013 03:29, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:08:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Joke poster cites joke "newspaper"

This story has more credence:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/429...-investigation


Are you sure you mean "credence" (the term used to denote the quality of
being prepared to believe, often in conjunction with the verb "to lend")?

Or did you mean "credibility"?

As I'm sure you know, they don't mean the same thing.

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:49:23 -0500, jnugent
wrote:

On 16/09/2013 03:29, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:08:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Joke poster cites joke "newspaper"

This story has more credence:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/429...-investigation


Are you sure you mean "credence" (the term used to denote the quality of
being prepared to believe, often in conjunction with the verb "to lend")?

Or did you mean "credibility"?

As I'm sure you know, they don't mean the same thing.

Credence was what I meant. The first article was a tongue-in-cheek
rant from a journalist. The second article was a report of a
conversation between an ex soldier and his ex wife.

‘Never pay for stuff, always moaning, and get really upset if you pull out quickly.’
 

On 17/09/2013 04:09, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:49:23 -0500, jnugent
wrote:

On 16/09/2013 03:29, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:08:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sunday, 15 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
Cyclists are the new women.

An amusing little read.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...new-women.html

Joke poster cites joke "newspaper"

This story has more credence:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/429...-investigation


Are you sure you mean "credence" (the term used to denote the quality of
being prepared to believe, often in conjunction with the verb "to lend")?

Or did you mean "credibility"?

As I'm sure you know, they don't mean the same thing.

Credence was what I meant.

I really don't see how.

The quantity of credence is a reaction of the person hearing the news.
Credibility is a quality of the information. It's a bit like "infer" and
"imply".

The first article was a tongue-in-cheek
rant from a journalist. The second article was a report of a
conversation between an ex soldier and his ex wife.

That isn't relevant.