|
Trainers
As I complete my recovery, and in general to deal with the darkness of
Northern winters I'm looking into bike trainers. My LBS stocks a magnetic model and two with fluid resistance (the deluxe version lets you tilt from side to side). The guy says 70% of their sales is the basic fluid trainer as it gives you realistic resistance unlike the magnetic type. My brother also recommended against the magnetic though he prefers the whole spin bikes. What are people's thoughts? Assuming usage of 5 hours per week during the dark months of December-February (sometimes icy March) is it worth the $300-$350? |
Trainers
Jorg Lueke wrote:
As I complete my recovery, and in general to deal with the darkness of Northern winters I'm looking into bike trainers. My LBS stocks a magnetic model and two with fluid resistance (the deluxe version lets you tilt from side to side). The guy says 70% of their sales is the basic fluid trainer as it gives you realistic resistance unlike the magnetic type. My brother also recommended against the magnetic though he prefers the whole spin bikes. What are people's thoughts? Assuming usage of 5 hours per week during the dark months of December-February (sometimes icy March) is it worth the $300-$350? I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. |
Trainers
On Nov 29, 11:04*am, Peter Cole wrote:
I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. I think it's more fun when the resistance changes. Like when you do the hill course on the excercise club bikes. Even with an mp3 player standing still can get boring. How hard are the mags in the lowest gear? |
Trainers
Jorg Lueke wrote:
On Nov 29, 11:04 am, Peter Cole wrote: I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. I think it's more fun when the resistance changes. Like when you do the hill course on the excercise club bikes. Even with an mp3 player standing still can get boring. How hard are the mags in the lowest gear? Mine (Blackburn) is hard enough. I use it in a medium resistance setting with a medium gear. You can always change the resistance on the fly by changing gears. I usually watch a movie or some other TV when on the trainer, so I only look for exercise, not entertainment. |
Trainers
On Nov 28, 4:51*pm, Jorg Lueke wrote:
delete What are people's thoughts? *Assuming usage of 5 hours per week during the dark months of December-February (sometimes icy March) is it worth the $300-$350? Rollers can help with your skills, especially keeping in a straight line, and are cheapest. Trainers are good for building strength,but can be quite boring, and cost a bit more. Watching TV can help a lot. Computerized trainers are even more expensive but can really help, especially if you can program a route that you usually train on. Is it worth it? How important is it for you to be strong early in the season? Recreational or Cat 5/4, you can get by without it. Want to get to Cat 3 or better with a 4 month layoff? You are not going to be competitive. |
Trainers
On Nov 30, 11:47*am, Peter Cole wrote:
Jorg Lueke wrote: On Nov 29, 11:04 am, Peter Cole wrote: I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. I think it's more fun when the resistance changes. *Like when you do the hill course on the excercise club bikes. * Even with an mp3 player standing still can get boring. *How hard are the mags in the lowest gear? Mine (Blackburn) is hard enough. I use it in a medium resistance setting with a medium gear. You can always change the resistance on the fly by changing gears. I usually watch a movie or some other TV when on the trainer, so I only look for exercise, not entertainment. Getting bored is a problem. It's one of the big pluses for outdoor cycling for me, it's one of the few activities I can stand to do for more than 10 hours per week. |
Trainers
In article ,
Jorg Lueke writes: On Nov 30, 11:47*am, Peter Cole wrote: Jorg Lueke wrote: On Nov 29, 11:04 am, Peter Cole wrote: I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. I think it's more fun when the resistance changes. *Like when you do the hill course on the excercise club bikes. * Even with an mp3 player standing still can get boring. *How hard are the mags in the lowest gear? Mine (Blackburn) is hard enough. I use it in a medium resistance setting with a medium gear. You can always change the resistance on the fly by changing gears. I usually watch a movie or some other TV when on the trainer, so I only look for exercise, not entertainment. Getting bored is a problem. It's one of the big pluses for outdoor cycling for me, it's one of the few activities I can stand to do for more than 10 hours per week. Outdoor[ish] activities that don't require bicycles are quite possible during the bleak months. I confess to enjoying ice skating. Not Olympics, hockey or (especially) figure skating stuff, just plain old casual ice skating. It doesn't combine real transportation with physical exuberance in the same manner as cycling, but neither does stationary cycling. But at least you're really moving, and really going somewhere. Even if it's around in ellipses, on an indoor rink. It's a little better than some sort of hamster wheel. Ice skates are basically heavy boots with cutlasses bolted onto their soles. Kicking those lead-weighted things along seems to work sets of leg muscles that bicycling overlooks. And snowshoeing is increasingly becoming popular, and people are realizing it isn't a simple matter of striding along with tennis raquets tied to your shoes. You could euphemistically call it: "cross training." cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
Trainers
On Dec 5, 8:46*pm, (Tom Keats) wrote:
In article , * * * * Jorg Lueke writes: On Nov 30, 11:47*am, Peter Cole wrote: Jorg Lueke wrote: On Nov 29, 11:04 am, Peter Cole wrote: I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. I think it's more fun when the resistance changes. *Like when you do the hill course on the excercise club bikes. * Even with an mp3 player standing still can get boring. *How hard are the mags in the lowest gear? Mine (Blackburn) is hard enough. I use it in a medium resistance setting with a medium gear. You can always change the resistance on the fly by changing gears. I usually watch a movie or some other TV when on the trainer, so I only look for exercise, not entertainment. Getting bored is a problem. *It's one of the big pluses for outdoor cycling for me, it's one of the few activities I can stand to do for more than 10 hours per week. Outdoor[ish] activities that don't require bicycles are quite possible during the bleak months. I confess to enjoying ice skating. *Not Olympics, hockey or (especially) figure skating stuff, just plain old casual ice skating. *It doesn't combine real transportation with physical exuberance in the same manner as cycling, but neither does stationary cycling. But at least you're really moving, and really going somewhere. Even if it's around in ellipses, on an indoor rink. *It's a little better than some sort of hamster wheel. Ice skates are basically heavy boots with cutlasses bolted onto their soles. *Kicking those lead-weighted things along seems to work sets of leg muscles that bicycling overlooks. And snowshoeing is increasingly becoming popular, and people are realizing it isn't a simple matter of striding along with tennis raquets tied to your shoes. You could euphemistically call it: "cross training." cheers, * * * * Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca I think cross country skiing might work for me too. I could start getting my oldest onto skiis too. Of course knowing him he'll start wanting to gop fast down big hills. |
Trainers
In article ,
Jorg Lueke writes: On Dec 5, 8:46*pm, (Tom Keats) wrote: In article , * * * * Jorg Lueke writes: On Nov 30, 11:47*am, Peter Cole wrote: Jorg Lueke wrote: On Nov 29, 11:04 am, Peter Cole wrote: I never understood the need for a trainer to be "realistic". I like mags because they're cheap and reliable. I think it's more fun when the resistance changes. *Like when you do the hill course on the excercise club bikes. * Even with an mp3 player standing still can get boring. *How hard are the mags in the lowest gear? Mine (Blackburn) is hard enough. I use it in a medium resistance setting with a medium gear. You can always change the resistance on the fly by changing gears. I usually watch a movie or some other TV when on the trainer, so I only look for exercise, not entertainment. Getting bored is a problem. *It's one of the big pluses for outdoor cycling for me, it's one of the few activities I can stand to do for more than 10 hours per week. Outdoor[ish] activities that don't require bicycles are quite possible during the bleak months. I confess to enjoying ice skating. *Not Olympics, hockey or (especially) figure skating stuff, just plain old casual ice skating. *It doesn't combine real transportation with physical exuberance in the same manner as cycling, but neither does stationary cycling. But at least you're really moving, and really going somewhere. Even if it's around in ellipses, on an indoor rink. *It's a little better than some sort of hamster wheel. Ice skates are basically heavy boots with cutlasses bolted onto their soles. *Kicking those lead-weighted things along seems to work sets of leg muscles that bicycling overlooks. And snowshoeing is increasingly becoming popular, and people are realizing it isn't a simple matter of striding along with tennis raquets tied to your shoes. You could euphemistically call it: "cross training." cheers, * * * * Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca I think cross country skiing might work for me too. I could start getting my oldest onto skiis too. Of course knowing him he'll start wanting to gop fast down big hills. I could possibly get into skiing, too. I tried it a little, a long time ago, before today's technological improvements in equipment and clothing. I ended up cold, wet & miserable. Of course I'd have to first suffer the ignonamy of the bunny hill before I become somewhat enured. But I'm willing to take another kick at the can. I guess we all need bikes, rollers, trainers, skis-&-gear, whitewater canoes & kayaks, fla****er canoes & kayaks, ice skates, various raquets, a couple of really good hackeysack bead bags, and somewhere to store it all. At least a couple of hackeysack bead bags fit in a dresser drawer. Unlike, say, golf or bowling equipment, for which I have no need anyway. A good round of 4-square hackeysack keeps one limber, and keeps leg cramps, back spasms and sciatica at bay. At least, it does for me, since so much of my work involves physical labour. The worst thing for me to do during a lunch break is to sit down and be suddenly become idle. Gotta keep moving. Just change the movements. A change is as good as a rest (if not better.) Hackeysack among competitors with heavy steel-toed boots on becomes an interesting and highly sporting enterprise. If you take your oldest XC skiing with you, and he wants to bomb down the steep hills, I guess he'll quickly realize what hoofing it up the next slope entails in terms of effort. And if you're combining XC with winter camping, and he's packing some of the gear, you might have to relieve him of some of his burden so he can gaspingly follow you up the hill and realize that although you're older, you're certainly no weakling, and you've still got more jam than he does. That's a preciously Classic father/son moment. That's when fatherhood clicks into place. What were we talking about? Oh, yeah -- mag vs fluid trainers. I don't think it really matters, when we're talking about things that resemble hamster wheels. If you can get some stuff that allows you to get of the house, you'll enjoy a little freedom. Whomever you leave in the house gets to enjoy a little freedom, too. Win-win. Except for the offsprings who get enlisted by Mom to help clean house. They have to learn. cheers, Tom -- "BLAAAGGHHH!!!!!!!!" -- I just felt like being expressive, and saying what's on everybody's mind. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
Trainers
Tom Keats wrote:
Outdoor[ish] activities that don't require bicycles are quite possible during the bleak months. I confess to enjoying ice skating. But at least you're really moving, and really going somewhere. Even if it's around in ellipses, on an indoor rink. I grew up on a lake (outside of Boston). On good winters (cold, no snow) we could skate for miles. After that, I never could really enjoy rink skating. At one of the local parks that seems to be now only used for dog defecation, lies the fieldstone chimney and foundation of an old warming hut, next to a sluice gate for flooding a flat field from a passing brook. It's hard to now imagine families spending a Sunday skating outdoors and warming by a roaring fire. And snowshoeing is increasingly becoming popular, and people are realizing it isn't a simple matter of striding along with tennis raquets tied to your shoes. Around here (Boston), there never is really enough snow to justify snowshoes. Even XC skiing is pretty spotty. Some winters it's great, others, non-existent (no snow). I guess we all need bikes, rollers, trainers, skis-&-gear, whitewater canoes & kayaks, fla****er canoes & kayaks, ice skates, various raquets, a couple of really good hackeysack bead bags, and somewhere to store it all. I almost never use my trainer. I set up my fixed gear bike with studded tires and there's never been a day I couldn't ride, even on unplowed bike paths. I was out riding the river path around midnight in late November a couple of years ago when I spotted a blinky pacing me in the darkness. It took me a while to realize it was someone rowing. Despite the fact that it was 15F last morning, I still haven't put away my skiff. I pull it with a bike trailer and will use it on mild days until the river freezes. I'm amazed to read the old stories of how there used to be 5,000 canoes in one short section of the river back in the 20's. People used to row in the moonlight and anchor by the bandstands on Saturday nights. The bandstands are gone and so are almost all the canoes. It sounds like paradise lost. There's a side street outside of Harvard Sq. that I frequently ride, which goes past a glass fronted gym where you can see rows of exercycles and treadmills. As I make eye contact with the patrons I wonder what they're thinking. Alas, the Italian cafe with outdoor tables that was often my destination has now been closed. Progress marches on. When I first started doing a Saturday club ride, maybe 12 years ago, the leaders announced that they were suspending for the winter. I said I was going to keep riding, alone if need be. That first winter I did ride alone a few times, but usually a few others would show up. Now, seeing 100 riders is not unusual in the dead of winter, even a dozen during snow or freezing rain. To people who would remark that winter cycling was crazy, I'd just compare it to skiing or skating. It seems we're becoming a nation of indoor people. There was one old standby that got people out and gave a chance to mingle with neighbors: yard work. Around here, even in a rather modest neighborhood, it all seems to have been outsourced. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com