Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


"The force said that the aim was partly intended to raise awareness that the
rules of the road apply to motorists and cyclists alike"

It's ridiculous just how many times this has to be said. Either cyclists are
inherently thick and cannot grasp the simple concept, or they just have
absolutely no regard for the law. Or both.

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message ...

I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741

The usual - denial.
They think that laws don't apply to them.
This judgement proves otherwise.

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


Excellent news. Serves the arrogant tosser right. He won't do that again
in a hurry.

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

On 08/01/2013 20:44, Mrcheerful wrote:
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


And about time. The sheer arrogance of cyclists is incredible.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:21:50 -0000, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:


"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


"The force said that the aim was partly intended to raise awareness that the
rules of the road apply to motorists and cyclists alike"

It's ridiculous just how many times this has to be said. Either cyclists are
inherently thick and cannot grasp the simple concept, or they just have
absolutely no regard for the law. Or both.

Or...... cars are bigger and heavier and going the wrong way up a one way street in a car is FAR more dangerous.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Is it true that DNA stands for the National Dyslexia Association?

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:21:50 -0000, Mentalguy2k8
wrote:

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown
court appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


"The force said that the aim was partly intended to raise awareness
that the rules of the road apply to motorists and cyclists alike"

It's ridiculous just how many times this has to be said. Either
cyclists are inherently thick and cannot grasp the simple concept,
or they just have absolutely no regard for the law. Or both.

Or...... cars are bigger and heavier and going the wrong way up a one
way street in a car is FAR more dangerous.

If the cyclist thinks the law is inappropriate , then he should capaign to
get it altered.
The law exists, obeying it is trivially easy. Breaking it was deliberate, a
fine on discovery should to be expected. The level of danger has nothing to
do with the case.

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message news:op.wqnuzybpytk5n5@i7-940...

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:21:50 -0000, Mentalguy2k8
wrote:


"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


"The force said that the aim was partly intended to raise awareness that
the
rules of the road apply to motorists and cyclists alike"

It's ridiculous just how many times this has to be said. Either cyclists
are
inherently thick and cannot grasp the simple concept, or they just have
absolutely no regard for the law. Or both.

Or...... cars are bigger and heavier and going the wrong way up a one way
street in a car is FAR more dangerous.

Then i suggest they start nicking them - oh! Hang on! they have been doing
that for years - DOH!!!!

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:42:11 -0000, Mrcheerful wrote:

Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:21:50 -0000, Mentalguy2k8
wrote:

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown
court appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


"The force said that the aim was partly intended to raise awareness
that the rules of the road apply to motorists and cyclists alike"

It's ridiculous just how many times this has to be said. Either
cyclists are inherently thick and cannot grasp the simple concept,
or they just have absolutely no regard for the law. Or both.

Or...... cars are bigger and heavier and going the wrong way up a one
way street in a car is FAR more dangerous.

If the cyclist thinks the law is inappropriate , then he should capaign to
get it altered.
The law exists, obeying it is trivially easy. Breaking it was deliberate, a
fine on discovery should to be expected. The level of danger has nothing to
do with the case.

You can't change stupid laws, we will always have stupid laws.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Streakers bewa Your end is in sight!

Brighton cyclist ordered to pay £1,000 for ignoring one-way sign
 

On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:46:28 -0000, Partac wrote:



"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message news:op.wqnuzybpytk5n5@i7-940...

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:21:50 -0000, Mentalguy2k8
wrote:


"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
I wonder what grounds the cyclist thought he had to make a crown court
appeal against a thirty quid fine?

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2...way-sign/18741


"The force said that the aim was partly intended to raise awareness that
the
rules of the road apply to motorists and cyclists alike"

It's ridiculous just how many times this has to be said. Either cyclists
are
inherently thick and cannot grasp the simple concept, or they just have
absolutely no regard for the law. Or both.

Or...... cars are bigger and heavier and going the wrong way up a one way
street in a car is FAR more dangerous.

Then i suggest they start nicking them - oh! Hang on! they have been doing
that for years - DOH!!!!

A car going the wrong way can cause a nasty accident. A bicycle won't.

And it's best to check for pigs before driving the wrong way - I did it every working day for two years to avoid a queue in roadworks. Got nicked precisely 0 times. I only had 3 occurrences of another drive shaking his fist.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Streakers bewa Your end is in sight!