View Single Post
Old April 18th 19, 12:55 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
external usenet poster
Posts: 56
Default Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.

On 18/04/2019 09:31, TMS320 wrote:
On 18/04/2019 03:00, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote:
On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:

But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50.
As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their
name. Stupid does as stupid rides.

You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent.

They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling
NG. Sad.

Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists?

This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING.

Very good!

That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else
you may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here,
you have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling
newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in
staying on-topic, are they?

Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the
lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in

If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of
riding the bike it is clearly on topic.

Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part
in the event described it is plainly not on topic.

Says who?

Anybody can say so.

But not convincingly.

This is not a difficult distinction.

It isn't.

But neither is it a relevant one.

Your opinions are usually of no worth.

That's how much I charge for them.


Home - Home - Home - Home - Home