On 05/04/2019 01:12, JNugent wrote:
On 04/04/2019 22:44, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/04/2019 19:55, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:
On 04/04/2019 17:05, JNugent wrote:
On 04/04/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/04/2019 16:28, JNugent wrote:

I am not reaily inclined to believe that you would be totally
neutral (still less pleased) if one of them were banned from
driving on "totting-up" and particularly not so if you could have
prevented it with a timely warning, as irritating as they may be
to some.

The first one would be a source of mild amusement.

You would be amused if a relative - or even a friend, assuming you
still have any - were banned from driving?

How long have you been estranged from your family?

One can just imagine a certain sort of person being unsympathetic in
such circumstances, but being *amused* by it?

Really?

If the incompetence continued to the full set, they would not ask
for sympathy and they wouldn't get any if they did.

Have you ever asked yourself whether you have your sense of life's
priorities in the right order?

It's not as though they've got cancer.

Cancer.
You have just dropped as low as a human can get with that comment.
****.

A colleague once had his car written off so he was without one for a
few weeks. He commented that some people had spoken to him as though
it was a bereavemment.

Trying to change the subject?

You're the expert. Without doubt, without Mr Pounder's intervention you
would have written a three paragraph reply.