On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 9:56:35 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 05/05/2019 15:36, MrCheerful wrote:
On 05/05/2019 09:41, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 07:39:55 GMT, MrCheerful
wrote:

On 05/05/2019 02:28, Rob Morley wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2019 11:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Simon Jester wrote:

It may not have been the best phrased title in usenet history

Indeed not, but perfectly understandable - only a smug little pedant
with nothing to contribute would have made an issue of it.

but
the point was clear. Motorists seem to think the horn is to say 'get
out of my way', or 'you cut me up'.
This.


There is a simple answer:Â* Do not get in other road users way, and do
not cut them up.Â* Then there will be no hooting.

Here's a word from Pounder:
Pillock.



but that does answer the grievance, people rarely hoot accidentally, it
is usually because of something another road has done, or may be about
to do.
Therefore, if you behave sensibly and lawfully, it will be
unusual for anyone to hoot you, except as a warning of imminent danger,
and no-one should really object to that.

Which planet do you inhabit?

Nugentworld?
Prime Directive: Cyclists can do no right, Motorists can do no wrong.
Secondary Directive: Make vacuous posts about grammar or spelling because you have nothing useful to contribute and you just want to score points on people who make a fool of you.
Tertiary Directive: Move the goalposts rather than admit you are wrong.
Quaternary Directive: Throw your toys out of the pram at all opportunities.