In article ,
gwhite wrote:

"D. Ferguson" wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:54:49 -0700, Howard Kveck
wrote:

Well, if you're going to be around here for a while, you'd better get used to
that.

Yeah, you'd think after a year I would get it by now.

For future reference, I would like the RBR FAQ to include, but not be
limited to, the following methods of debate as valid forms of making
claims and coming to conclusion.

Ad Hominem
Appeal to Belief
Appeal to Common Practice
Appeal to Consequences of a Belief
Appeal to Emotion
Appeal to Fear
Appeal to Popularity
Appeal to Ridicule
Appeal to Tradition
Bandwagon
Begging the Question
Biased Sample
Burden of Proof
Confusing Cause and Effect
False Dilemma
Gambler's Fallacy
Genetic Fallacy
Guilt By Association
Hasty Generalization
Poisoning the Well
Post Hoc
Red Herring
Slippery Slope
Straw Man

Hopefully this will curb all desire for a logical debate.

Dumbass,

Nice.

For exposition and Latin titles see

http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/index.htm

--
Michael Press