View Single Post
  #5  
Old November 6th 18, 04:36 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Frank Krygowski[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,511
Default Oregon judge: Bike lanes don't continue through intersections

On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-5, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 6:15:49 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
According to an Oregon judge, bike lanes don't legally exist in
intersections.

It's a bit odd, because car lanes do, even though (for practical
reasons) they are not marked. If you are driving in a lane just before
an intersection, you are expected to stay in that same unmarked lane
within the intersection and drive in the same lane past the
intersection. On a four-lane road, a motorist to your left is not
allowed to smash into you by changing lanes mid-intersection.

For a bike lane, this judge says it's different:
https://bikeportland.org/2018/10/17/...FVWPMeZZbRZuqo

This sounds like an excellent reason to leave the bike lane before an
intersection and claim the normal vehicle lane.


Yes, although AFRAP still applies.


As Far Right as Practicable should not require someone to endanger themselves.
Seems to me that riding straight while at the right side blind spot of someone
who may turn right is endangering one's self.

I never see "straight ahead" motor vehicle lanes striped to the right of
"right turn" lanes. They do that nonsense only with bike lanes.

- Frank Krygowski
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home