On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 12:56:22 UTC+1, thirty-six wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 11:55:25 UTC+1, Partac wrote:



You obviously know that from first hand experience.



amazingly we have a language (in common use, but not of the commoner) which has been so corrupted that slight differences in the placement of letters on the page have totally opposite meanings. I believe (and I am wary of the dangers) that some thought has gone into making the commoner obviously oblyvious to the techniques of textural conJury.



For the purpose of Society it IS necessary to train the minds of common men and women to ignore that which is texturally obvious.


Oops, should have said, Plain to see. Why use obfuscation when simple words show the meaning and truth. I ask my-self, Is there good reason to choose not to be literate? It is best to know what words have straight meaning than to stand-under those that one does not know of their truth.

It is that Schooling is required, to read without knowing, for Society's gain. The keystone to the heir-arch-y (note architecture and (free)masonry)) is to fill with under-standing so there is no place for knowledge.

The ledge for knowns should not be filled with nonsense, yet this is what is allowed as Society rules over the common man.

The common man has historically lost out to Society, as Society has stolen the lives and labours of the common man, all in full view, but only comprehensible by those who have escaped Societal organised shooling, or have chosen to ignore the non-sense and eventually see the bindings of books ARE all that binds man to the legal NON-SENSE.



Do you understand or do you know?



Use your knowse!