On 00:05 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Monday, 18 May 2020 13:14:54 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 20:47 17 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Sunday, 17 May 2020 19:19:26 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 17:21 17 May 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 2:18:34 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 13:18 17 May 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 12:46:27 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins
wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=319hzKKiSlE

Obviously fake as it shows a motorist going through a red
light and we are told this never happens.

I had dozen of RLJ drivers on film when I used to cycle to
work.

In my experience it's is rare to see a cyclist observe a red
light.

You must a have very limited "experience" then.

At a red light too many cyclists act as if it's their absolute right
to go through on red if there's no traffic. It's quite disgraceful.

The part of your post where you provided evidence to support this
claim seems to be missing.

Michael, the part of your post where you show evidence of a search to
read more about this is missing. Laziness is becoming a habit for you.

------

The burden of proof is on you,


A TFL survey of 7500 cyclists found 1 in 6 admitted to going through a
red light. Who know how many didn't admit it.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Stat...ugh+Red+Lights

I repeat, at a red light too many cyclists act as if it's their
absolute right to go through on red if there's no traffic. It's
disgraceful.

So you have no evidence to support your claim.

You have been behaving more and more like a troll. Pretending to be clue-
proof is a common technique amongst such Usenet deviants. I suggest you
rethink your negative behaviour:

http://fravia.2113.ch/way_kook.htm