"JNugent" wrote in message
...
On 20/07/2013 17:06, TMS320 wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
TMS320 wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote

It is far easier and safer for almost anyone to negotiate a
relatively smooth stationary vehicle parked partly or even wholly on
a pavement, than it is to negotiate an obscenity screaming,
slobbering, smelly oaf on a moving bike (with lots of sticky out
bits) that may approach from any direction .

Here's a tip. Reduce the number of bottles you buy in your weekly
shop. You would be able to walk in a straighter line and the cyclist
will be able to find a way round you more easily. It's even possible
that you stop imagining things.

Tell that to all the OAPs that suffer broken hips and worse when they
are
hit by these bicycle weapons.

There is a far greater threat when walking anywhere. Motor vehicles.

Thanks to JNugent:-

That does *not* mean that I condone or recommend cyclists from
ignoring
traffic regulations, merely that I point out that there is little harm
which
actually flows from it in reality, even if there is plenty in the weird
imaginations of some.

That's a silly forgery.

At least I gave you the credit.

A stationary car can do no harm to anyone (unless it's on top of them).

I didn't say "stationary motor vehicles represent the far greater threat to
pedestrians". I said that "motor vehicles represent the far greater threat
to pedestrians". Is there a factual error?