Why aren't disabled cyclists treated the same as disabled motorists?
Rob Morley wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:36:24 +0100
JNugent wrote:
Rob Morley wrote:
I wouldn't find a bike useful in those situations, but I would in
pedestrianised shopping areas.
I don't care how "useful" the cyclist may find it. It would be too
dangerous for others. A pedestrianised area is for... pedestrians.
And mobility scooters that charge around with no consideration for
pedestrians. I could legally use one of those, so why not a bike?
And mobility scooters that charge around with no consideration for
pedestrians. I could legally use one of those, so why not a Jaguar XJS
or a Renault Megane?
Because users of mobility scooters can't walk (very far). The rest of us
don't have that difficulty.
How about you?
|