On Tue, 25 May 2004 14:05:40 +0100, David Hansen
wrote (more or less):

On Tue, 25 May 2004 13:03:30 +0100 someone who may be Peter Clinch
wrote this:-
....
opefully Guardbridge will see
similar upgeading, though in that case you could achieve everything
required by just taking out any attempt at cycle paths.

That would be ideal, but would reduce their "km of cycle facility"
figure.

Yes - that km figure really should cover displacement rather than
distance.

Which would also mean that long, indirect, windy 'facilities' would
have a much higher £/km build cost than direct ones.

--
Cheers,
Euan
Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122
Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk