Mike Vandeman wrote in message
...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:54:02 GMT, "Scott Burley"

wrote:

. .You dope. The paths we maintain and clear are used by dog walkers and
the
. .like which would not be possible if it weren't for our hard work. The
.area
. .is hardly prime wilderness, its on the outskirts of a town and as I
.stated
. .the fact that we keep the place tidy and in obvious use means that
people
. .are less likely to dump garbage/stolen cars and other threats to
wildlife
. .far more serious than a few paths.
. .
. .Steve.
.
. BS. If it were so beneficial to wildlife & people, the local
authorities
.would
. have been glad to authorize it. They DIDN'T. You took the law into your
.own
. hands, and now you expect SYMPATHY?! Ha ha ha.
.
.Gee, do you really trust local authorities to be so omniscient as to
always
.do the right thing?

No, but they ARE in charge. YOU aren't.

But that's contradictory. In your previous post you said that if the jump
had been beneficial to wildlife & people, the local authorities would have
been glad to authorize it. Now you say that local authorities cannot be
trusted to do the right thing. So which is it?


--
__ __ _ ___ ___
/ _|/ _/ |_ _|_ _|
\_ ( (( o | | | |
|__/\__\_/|_| |_|