On Jul 31, 7:19*pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:41:24 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:



On Jul 31, 6:03 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, i ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:

On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:

Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know what you are
all about?

The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been since 2
February 2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059

Do keep up!

Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.

Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other "Greenwich".

I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of the
river thames.

I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.

The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.

I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case, I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?

Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you seek?

Just trying to be clear.

And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.

Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?

And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.

My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.

House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.

Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,

http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...

Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.

It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.

Blackheath (most of it anyway) is in the LB of Lewisham.

A two bedroom townhouse in SE3 can go for anything up to 650,000.http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-34983076.html

Compare with Deptford, 250,000 for a comparable property:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-34007608.html

Though I do note that the floor area in the Blackheath house is a
massive 110 square metres. The Deptford one is probably 60-80 sq
metres.

Nothing would ever induce me to move back there again.

My Deptford chum, who lives in Royal Greenwich, has one of these:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-23433003.html

Well I'm ****ed, your mates flat is built on what was for many years a
scrapyard, we had a yard on the other side of the creek at Dreadnought
Wharf which has probably been redeveloped by now.