View Single Post
  #8  
Old November 8th 04, 01:14 AM
Matt O'Toole
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Baka wrote:

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 12:20:30 -0800, Zoot Katz
wrote:

Sun, 07 Nov 2004 11:21:58 -0800, ,
Bill Baka wrote:

The police around here mainly patrol the populated areas, and this
is not,
yet. There is a 1,000 house development being built and it may take
someones' kid getting hurt for the police to start patroling.
Sometimes reality sucks.
Bill Baka


If it had been built for people instead of their cars, a community of
1000 people could pretty much police itself.


Very true. Real estate is crazy aound here, and these houses are
being sold before they are even finished. I wouldn't buy one just
because I have seen how they are built, el cheapo. No bike paths
either, but it is all 25MPH zone. Last year it was just a nice open
field to ride across.
My short cut has been paved over and clogged with houses. I think the
police
will start patroling shortly and follow the money, err, um, higher
income types.


The problem is not the prices, etc., or where the police choose to patrol. It's
that we build houses too far from everything else, so most people feel the need
to get in their cars to do anything. Communities can and should be built so
children can walk to school and other activities, so that adults can walk to
stores, etc. While completely eliminating commuting to work by car may not be
practical, eliminating a major portion of the 80% of car trips that are less
than 3 miles certainly is.

Matt O.


Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home