On 22/09/2019 14:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 22/09/2019 14:10, JNugent wrote:
On 22/09/2019 14:03, TMS320 wrote:

On 21/09/2019 15:19, JNugent wrote:

[Devices which sense the extent of a driver's irritation or anger and
are capable of limiting the vehicle's operation as an amelioration
method.]

Those would be very useful if they could be adapted for compulsory
use by those permanently-angry urban cyclists constantly on the
lookout for the opportunity for a fight with... well, with just
about anyone, really.

It has recently been established that you just make this up. Pity
there are no spittle sensors on your computer.

Denial... never a good tactic.

It's a valid response to your allegation. Up to you to prove it.

You know full well that you are wrong. But more importantly, so does
everyone else.

How do you know what other people think?

The people I'm referring to give no signs of doing much thinking.


--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com