In article ,
says...

Confusing no cycling sign for a pavement where none is needed - it's a
pavement.

http://road.cc/content/news/26248-cy...-not-here-here

So would you, Simon Mason, Guardian of the Law (that's The Law no matter
what, and sod common sense), cycle there or not? Would cycling there be
as bad as shoplifting? If not, why not?

Personally, I think that road (not to mention 99% of other urban roads
these days) would better serve *everyone* if the politically correct
clutter that infests it weren't there in the first place. But that
wouldn't appease those whose number one aim is to **** off car drivers,
and never mind how it impacts on anyone else, including "legitimate"
road users like cyclists.