On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:45:06 +0100, JNugent
wrote:

On 18/06/2014 15:35, Bertie Wooster wrote:

JNugent wrote:
On 18/06/2014 15:27, Phil W Lee wrote:
Bertie Wooster wrote:

Matt was never a complainer - he was a bore. But he stayed on-topic,
and was always polite and well-mannered.

In which case, his posts would have been rejected as not complying with the
charter - remember this bit?

"...of interest to cyclists..."

Is it being polite and well-mannered which is not "...of interest to
cyclists..."?

No, it's the "I'm not interested in anything with which I disagree"
interpretation of that part of the charter.

Oooo... You ARE a one, Mr Wooster...

Weren't me... I'm not that sharp.

'Twas the work of The Forger.