On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:27:15 -0300, Phil W Lee wrote:

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:46:31 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:



Matt was never a complainer - he was a bore. But he stayed on-topic,
and was always polite and well-mannered.


In which case, his posts would have been rejected as not complying with the
charter - remember this bit?

"...of interest to cyclists..."

Which was interpreted by the moderators as being:
"...of what we want to be of interest to cyclists..."

Clearly if Matt B's comments were not of interest to cyclists, no
cyclist would ever respond, and he'd soon stop posting.