On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote:

Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text.

You quoted this:

"...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for
her to cross..."

Then you asked:

"If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?"

You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying
when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went
green for her to cross...".

Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green.
I look forward to reading your apology.

I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused
them of lying. That was you.


You still need to provide evidence to support this claim.
I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green.

....thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the
pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green.

"We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology.

You accused the police of lying. I owe them no apology, not having
accused them of anything.