On 20:32 19 May 2020, TMS320 said:
On 19/05/2020 14:08, Pamela wrote:
On 10:47 19 May 2020, TMS320 said:
Pamela wrote:

Cyclists in this group have taken the side of the father because
the girl was riding a bike but what if she was on a scooter or
skateboard and fell over after being unable to slow down for a
couple on the footpath? Would they still think she and her
father was in the right?

Perhaps the cyclists can get you for libel with your claim "that they
have taken the side of the father".

Simon has alleged the man committed a public order offence. Simon also
provided own false testimony. See:

MID

It's pointless making a link. If there is something you want to bring
forward just copy and past it. Not that it's relevant.

Wake up, duh! The link show the origin of what I quoted. I hope you're
pretending to be thick and that it's not natural.

It is not libel for me to say cyclists have taken the side of the father.

But still an inaccurate statement.

In other words, your earlier comment is incorrect:

Perhaps the cyclists can get you for libel with your claim "that they
have taken the side of the father".