Moderators being rather picky?
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:24:56 -0300, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:14:33 +0100, Judith wrote:
On 19 Jun 2014 16:58:18 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
wrote:
Quoting Scion :
If you came to the group today, as an unknown, posted two or three replies
and maybe started a new topic, then received a message saying that you
were 'on probation' therefore your posts had been rejected, you would
probably not feel the same.
If that ever happens to a bona-fide new poster, let us know.
It gets worse.
So a new poster turns up, and you look in to the URCM crystal ball and try and
ascertain whether this is a "bon-fide" new poster or a "mala-fide" new poster -
and then take a different action depending on your infallible method and
considered opinion, rather than just moderating the post on its content.
Perhaps ULM should take up this novel approach: it's certainly made URCM a very
successful group.
Please keep this in uk.net.news.moderation, where it belongs; and not in
uk.rec.cycling, where it does not.
Thanks forger.
[urc put back in]
|