On 20 Jun 2014 12:22:05 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
wrote:

Quoting Judith :
wrote:
Certainly it has. There was a long period when it attracted more new
posters than any other uk.* group
Very good: I am sure that you will be able to substantiate this claim in some
way.

You posted the articles (and the articles here from the sock complaining
about the rejections); count 'em up for yourself.


Oh - so you claim that there was a period when URCM attracted more new posters
than *any* other uk group - but you cannot back up that claim.

I am sure people will understand.

Or was that period something like between 0100 and 0130 on a particular date -
when one new poster posted to URCM - and no new posters posted to any other uk
group?